Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pol Arch Intern Med ; 134(4)2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483121

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transfemoral access is a prevailing approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in contemporary practice, with a shift from surgical arteriotomy to a percutaneous arterial approach. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed long- and short­term mortality, along with Valve Academic Research Consortium-2-defined complications in percutaneous transfemoral approach (PTA) TAVI. Furthermore, it explored the impact of a learning curve on procedural outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 600 patients undergoing PTA TAVI at the National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland, from January 2009 to September 2020. Retrospective data comparison involved 2 groups: early experience (first 200 patients) and late experience (next 400 patients). RESULTS: The primary end point (composite of life­threatening bleeding, major vascular complication, or death at 30 days) occurred less often in the late experience group (28% vs 17.5%; P = 0.003). The late experience group also showed fewer cases of vascular complications (19% vs 10.7%; P = 0.005) and major bleeding (17.5% vs 8.5%; P = 0.001). Propensity matching yielded similar trends, including reduced frequency of pacemaker implantation (22.8% vs 10.9%; P = 0.03) and shorter median (interquartile range) hospitalization (11 [8-18] vs 7 [6-12] days; P <0.001) in the late experience group. CONCLUSIONS: The late experience group rated with PTA TAVI exhibited significantly reduced periprocedural complications, indicating a positive impact of accumulated expertise.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Femoral Artery , Postoperative Complications , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Female , Male , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Poland , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 9(8): 768-777, 2023 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637410

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Prediction of adverse events in mid-term follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is challenging. We sought to develop and validate a machine learning model for prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent TAVI and were discharged following the index procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The model was developed on data of patients who underwent TAVI at a high-volume centre between January 2013 and March 2019. Machine learning by extreme gradient boosting was trained and tested with repeated 10-fold hold-out testing using 34 pre- and 25 peri-procedural clinical variables. External validation was performed on unseen data from two other independent high-volume TAVI centres. Six hundred four patients (43% men, 81 ± 5 years old, EuroSCORE II 4.8 [3.0-6.3]%) in the derivation and 823 patients (46% men, 82 ± 5 years old, EuroSCORE II 4.7 [2.9-6.0]%) in the validation cohort underwent TAVI and were discharged home following the index procedure. Over the 12 months of follow-up, 68 (11%) and 95 (12%) subjects died in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In external validation, the machine learning model had an area under the receiver-operator curve of 0.82 (0.78-0.87) for prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality following hospital discharge after TAVI, which was superior to pre- and peri-procedural clinical variables including age 0.52 (0.46-0.59) and the EuroSCORE II 0.57 (0.51-0.64), P < 0.001 for a difference. CONCLUSION: Machine learning based on readily available clinical data allows accurate prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality following a successful TAVI.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Male , Humans , Infant , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(12): e019051, 2021 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34056919

ABSTRACT

Background There is a paucity of outcome data on patients who are morbidly obese (MO) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We aimed to determine their periprocedural and midterm outcomes and investigate the impact of obesity phenotype. Methods and Results Consecutive patients who are MO (body mass index, ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidities; n=910) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement in 18 tertiary hospitals were compared with a nonobese cohort (body mass index, 18.5-29.9 kg/m2, n=2264). Propensity-score matching resulted in 770 pairs. Pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement computed tomography scans were centrally analyzed to assess adipose tissue distribution; epicardial, abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat. Major vascular complications were more common (6.6% versus 4.3%; P=0.043) and device success was less frequent (84.4% versus 88.1%; P=0.038) in the MO group. Freedom from all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were similar at 2 years (79.4 versus 80.6%, P=0.731; and 88.7 versus 87.4%, P=0.699; MO and nonobese, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified baseline glomerular filtration rate and nontransfemoral access as independent predictors of 2-year mortality in the MO group. An adverse MO phenotype with an abdominal visceral adipose tissue:subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio ≥1 (VAT:SAT) was associated with increased 2-year all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 3.06; 95% CI, 1.20-7.77; P=0.019) and cardiovascular (hazard ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.06-15.90; P=0.041) mortality, and readmissions (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.07-3.07; P=0.027). After multivariable analysis, a (VAT:SAT) ratio ≥1 remained a strong predictor of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio, 2.78; P=0.035). Conclusions Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients who are MO has similar short- and midterm outcomes to nonobese patients, despite higher major vascular complications and lower device success. An abdominal VAT:SAT ratio ≥1 identifies an obesity phenotype at higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Adiposity , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Body Mass Index , Europe , Female , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , Male , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Obesity, Morbid/mortality , Phenotype , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Subcutaneous Fat/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
Pol Arch Intern Med ; 131(2): 145-151, 2021 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491938

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The number of elderly patients requiring treatment of aortic stenosis is expected to grow steadily due to increasing lifespan. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative treat­ ment for patients with aortic stenosis considered nonoptimal candidates for surgical valve replacement. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess age­related differences in 30­day and 1­year cardiovascular mortality, Valve Academic Research Consortium­2 (VARC­2)-defined complications in patients undergoing TAVI, by comparing outcomes in patients younger than 85 years and those aged 85 years or older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group included patients who underwent TAVI at the Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw from January 2009 to July 2019. Clinical, procedural, and follow­up data were retrospectively collected and compared in 2 groups defined according to age: group 1, younger than 85 years (417) and group 2, aged 85 or older (200). RESULTS: The surgical risk profile assessed by the EuroSCORE II was significantly higher in the group of older patients (median [interquartile range], 6.5% [3.5%-17.3%] vs 7.2% [3.4%-18.1%]; P = 0.002); 30­day and 1­year cardiovascular mortality was 4.3% in group 1 as compared with 5% in group 2 (P = 0.69) and 10.8% in group 1 as compared with 9.4% in group 2 (P = 0.51), respectively. The rate of VARC­2­defined complications was similar in both groups, with the exception of major vascular com­ plications (3.12% vs 8.5%; P = 0.004) and major bleeding (10.8% vs 18.5%; P = 0.008), which were more prevalent in older patients. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular mortality at 1 month and 1 year following TAVI is similar in patients aged 85 years or older and in those younger than 85 years.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...