Mot luuk problems in Northeast Thailand: why women's own health concerns matter as much as disease rates.

In this paper, we consider women's illness experiences, above and beyond the presence of clinically identifiable disease. In Northeast Thailand, epidemiological data suggest that the prevalence of major women's reproductive tract infections is relatively low and not a cause for significant public health attention. Conversely, we found that self-reported rates of gynecological complaints are high and a significant women's health concern in rural Northeast villages. Women's embodied experiences and interpretations of these complaints affect their lives dramatically. Moreover, women's responses to gynecological problems (regardless of diagnosed morbidity) constitute an important health issue in their own right. In this regard, we document the dangers of women's self-treatment practices that rely largely on small doses of medically inappropriate antibiotics, the manner in which family life and sexual relations are disrupted by fears that gynecological problems will progress to cervical cancer, health care seeking patterns and expectations from health staff, and most importantly, how women's concerns about the seriousness of recurrent ailments result in substantial suffering. This study demonstrates why attention to women's own health concerns is as important to address in health programs as rates of disease, and why common gynecological problems and work-related complaints are important to take seriously rather than dismiss as psychological or routine and expected. We argue that there is a strong need to conduct ethnographic research on women's health problems as a complement to, and not merely a support for, epidemiological research. An evidence-based approach to health policy needs to be accompanied by a more humanistic approach to understanding health care needs.

Self-medication practices in two California Mexican communities.

Although social scientists have taken up the study of medication use in both developing and developed nations, the medication practices of immigrants remain largely unstudied. In this study, qualitative research was employed in order to describe and compare self-medication practices in two California Mexican immigrant groups: families living along the border near Tijuana, Mexico, and migrant farm worker families residing in illegal encampments and substandard housing in San Diego's North County. Medication and health seeking practices were found to vary according to the specific political-economic, sociocultural, and geographic contexts in which different subpopulations of California Mexicans live. The California-Mexico border area was examined as an important context for considering self-medication behaviors, since it permits border-crossing into Tijuana for the purpose of buying Mexican pharmaceuticals at low cost without a prescription. The popularity of injections among California Mexicans and the cross-border purchasing of injectable antibiotics and vitamins are discussed as issues of particular relevance for immigrants living along the border.

The dilemma of mental health paraprofessionals at home.

The use of community member paraprofessionals in the delivery of mental health services is complicated by the changing nature of the paraprofessional's social relationships within the community. We use an anthropological model of Coast Salish social organization and data from a current delivery system, the Swinomish (Washington) Tribal Mental Health Project, to suggest ways to conceptualize and account for such complications.