Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagn Ther Endosc ; 2013: 891915, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737656

ABSTRACT

Background. There is little prospective data on whether bigger plastic stents are better for patients with malignant biliary obstruction with jaundice. Goals. Multicenter prospective study to compare technical success, clinical response, stent occlusion, and patient survival in patients with malignant biliary obstruction randomized to 10-French or 11.5-French plastic stent. Study. Patients with malignant biliary obstruction were randomized to 10-French or 11.5-French biliary stents. Patients were prospectively assessed for stent occlusion, stent-related interventions, hospital stay, and change in bilirubin. Main outcome measurements included technical success, clinical response, rates of stent occlusion, and survival. Results. 234 patients (47 hilar and 187 common bile duct strictures) were randomized. Outcomes were similar for the 10-French and 11.5-French groups (technical success 99.1% versus 97.4%, P = 0.37). Overall, median stent survival was 213 days, but there was no statistically significant difference in stent survival between 10-French and 11.5-French stents (149 versus 258 days, P = 0.16). Stent survival was significantly longer when placed for common bile duct versus hilar strictures (231 versus 115 days, P = 0.049). Conclusions. The theoretical advantage of improved bile flow for the 11.5-French stent does not translate into more prolonged patency, better clinical response, and longer patient survival than the 10-French stent.

2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 47(6): 526-31, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23269313

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Endoscopic stent insertion is considered the method of choice for palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction (MBDO). However, it can cause complications and requires periodic stent exchanges. Although endoscopic stenting is clearly indicated for relief of cholangitis or refractory pruritus, its role in patients with jaundice alone is less clear. Endoscopic stenting for this relative indication might be justified, if there is a significant improvement in quality of life (QOL) of such patients. The aim of our study was to determine whether endoscopic stenting for MBDO results in improved QOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for MBDO and participating in a randomized trial comparing patency duration of 10 and 11.5-Fr biliary plastic stents, completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire at baseline, at 1 month after stent insertion, and at 180 days after stent insertion. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients answered the QOL questionnaire at baseline, 95 patients answered the questionnaire at 30 days, and 54 patients answered the questionnaire at 180 days after stent insertion. Endoscopic biliary stenting resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall score of QOL, and different aspects of QOL such as physical, emotional, and functional well-being. There was a statistically significant improvement in most of the symptoms specific for MBDO at 30 and 180 days after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stenting significantly improves QOL in patients with MBDO, and, therefore, is an appropriate part of palliative treatment in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Cholestasis/surgery , Duodenoscopy , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Quality of Life , Stents , Aged , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholestasis/etiology , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 97(8): 2100-2, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12190183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: No data are available about the site distribution and characteristics of colorectal adenomas in Hispanics. The purpose of this study is to study the site distribution and characteristics of adenomas in Hispanics as compared to whites. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who had colonoscopies with resection of adenomatous polyps. Patients were classified by age, sex, and race. Polyps were classified by site and histology. RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis. These included 541 whites and 453 Hispanics. The mean age was 60 yr. The site distributions of adenomas were similar (p = 0.32), and adenoma histologies were similar (p = 0.16). Thirty percent of patients had no polyps in the descending colon (27%, Hispanics; 31%, whites). CONCLUSION: Hispanics and whites have similar site distributions of colorectal adenomas and similar adenoma histologies. Screening modalities excluding the area proximal to the splenic flexure would miss about 30% of the polyps in both populations.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Adenoma/ethnology , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Mexico/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , White People/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...