Effects of sewage sludge pretreatment methods on its use in agricultural applications.

Pretreatment is widely used in sludge dewatering, however, its potentially impact on the subsequent sludge agricultural applications is often neglected. Here, the potential benefits and risks of the sludge with no pretreatment and with four most commonly used pretreatment methods in sludge agricultural applications were assessed using potted lettuce, an experimental crop. The results show that sewage sludge pretreatment methods can greatly affect its agricultural applications. The application of different pretreatment methods can potentially reduce the harm caused by pathogens. At low dosage (0.2 g kg-1), different sludge fertilizers promoted an increase in crop yield of 14.6% to 49.1%, and the concentrations of heavy metals in the crop and soil were controlled within safe ranges. At high dosage (8 g kg-1), crop yield using pretreated sludge (except anaerobic digestion) decreased by between 32.7% and 57.5%, but heavy metal pollution of both crop and soil increased. In terms of promoting crop growth and reducing heavy metal accumulation, untreated sludge was better than pretreated sludges and sludge with physical pretreatments was better than that with chemical pretreatments. Overall, this study clearly shows that the introduction of pretreatment in sludge dewatering can inevitably impact its agricultural land application.

A unified operating procedure is crucial to evaluate sludge dewaterability, taking the setup of refrigerated storage time as an example.

Although extensive efforts have been carried out to study sludge dewatering mechanism, the lack of universal operating procedures makes it never be satisfactorily explained. This study evaluated the impact of a unified operating procedure on waste activated sludge (WAS) dewaterability by taking the setup of refrigerated storage time as an example. It was found that storage time played an important role in determining WAS dewaterability and sampled WAS should be refrigerated within 2 days. The results showed that after 2-d storage, sludge filterability was deteriorated significantly while the extent of dewatering efficiency had little change. Meanwhile, increasing storage time greatly increased the release of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and heavy metals, decreased sludge viscosity and weakened its network strength, but had little impact on the floc size and zeta potential of the sludge samples. It can hardly reveal the mechanism of storage time on sludge dewaterability due to the non-uniformity of operating procedures in literatures, which is normally ignored. This study emphasizes a unified operating procedure is crucial to evaluate WAS dewaterability. Therefore, more efforts shall be focused on establishing the uniform operating procedure while advancing applied research in the field of sludge dewatering.