Sex-related difference analyses of efficacy and safety in clinical trials of direct-acting antivirals to treat chronic HCV genotype 1 and 3 infections.

This study aims to identify clinically meaningful sex differences in efficacy and selected safety adverse events for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) or HIV/HCV co-infection in those receiving combination direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens. Our assessment was based on adult trial participants treated at the approved DAA dosage and treatment duration from 40 phase 3 clinical trials submitted to the FDA. Female enrollment ranged from 11% to 54% (overall mean 38%). Females with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection had statistically significant higher unadjusted or covariant-adjusted odds of achieving sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) compared with males. Odds ratios favouring females were observed among Whites and those ≥40 years of age with HCV GT1 or 3 infections, and among those ≥50 years of age, non-cirrhotic and those with HCV GT3 infection who were treatment-experienced. These differences were not clinically relevant due to the high SVR12 rate achieved by females and males, overall or in subgroups. No differences were observed in SVR12 rates between HCV GT1 mono-infected and HCV GT1/ HIV-1 co-infected participants. Numerically, more females reported headache, fatigue and nausea compared to males, but the differences were small and predominately Grade 1 or 2 severity. Discontinuation rates for any reason or due to an adverse event were low and similar between the sexes. Our study demonstrated females successfully complete DAA regimens and achieve high SVR12 rates despite numerically higher adverse events for certain commonly reported events.

Participation of HIV-1 infected treatment-naive females in clinical trials and sex differences in efficacy and safety outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine female participation and the observed efficacy and safety by sex from phase 3 HIV-1 trials submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support approval or a major labeling change. DESIGN: Our analyses were based on phase 3 trials in HIV-1 infected treatment-naive adults submitted to FDA since 2010. METHODS: We evaluated enrollment of treatment-naive females in 18 clinical trials for HIV-1. Participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) was calculated as the percentage of females among trial participants divided by the percentage of females in the disease population. PPR between 0.8 and 1.2 reflects similar representation of females in the trial and the disease population. Sex differences in efficacy (virologic response rates) and selected safety events were evaluated. RESULTS: United States (US) females, particularly US Black females were not adequately represented in clinical trials. The PPR for US females overall was 0.59 and for US Black females was 0.63. Statistically significant sex differences favoring males were observed for efficacy outcomes in both the global population and US participants. Statistically significant sex differences were observed for some safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: US females are underrepresented in phase 3 HIV-1 clinical trials. Underrepresentation was not likely due to enrollment criteria. Statistically significant sex differences were noted for efficacy and selected safety outcomes; however, some differences were not clinically relevant. The ability to detect sex differences was hindered by low numbers of female participants overall and within subgroups. Additional research into innovative approaches to recruit and retain females in clinical trials should continue.

Mood and Behaviors of Adolescents With Depression in a Longitudinal Study Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether, compared to pre-pandemic levels, depressive and anxiety symptoms in adolescents with depression increased during the pandemic. METHOD: We used data from National Institute of Mental Health Characterization and Treatment of Depression (NIMH CAT-D) cohort, a longitudinal case-control study that started pre-pandemic. Most of the participants are from the states of Maryland and Virginia in the United States. We compared depressive symptoms (1,820 measurements; 519 measurements pre-pandemic and 1,302 during the pandemic) and anxiety symptoms (1,800 measurements; 508 measurements pre-pandemic and 1,292 ratings during the pandemic) of 166 adolescents (109 girls, 96 adolescents with depression) before and during the pandemic. Data were collected during yearly clinical visits, interim 4-month follow-up visits, inpatient stays, and weekly outpatient sessions, with additional data collection during the pandemic. Pre-pandemic, healthy volunteers (HVs) had a median of 1 depressive and anxiety rating (range, 1-3), and adolescents with depression had a median of 2 ratings (anxiety rating range, 1-25; depressive rating range, 1-26). During the pandemic, HVs had a median of 8 anxiety ratings and 9 depressive ratings (range, 1-13), and adolescents with depression had a median of 7 anxiety and depressive ratings (range, 1-29). We also analyzed adolescent- and parent-reported behaviors in the CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS), totaling 920 self-reported measures for 164 adolescents (112 girls, 92 adolescents with depression). HVs had a median of 7 surveys (range, 1-8), and adolescents with depression had a median of 5 surveys (range, 1-8). RESULTS: Pre-pandemic, adolescents with depression had a mean depressive score of 11.16 (95% CI = 10.10, 12.22) and HVs had a mean depressive score of 1.76 (95% CI = 0.40, 3.13), a difference of 9.40 points (95% CI = 7.78, 11.01). During the pandemic, this difference decreased by 22.6% (2.05 points, 95% CI = 0.71, 3.40, p = .003) due to 0.89 points decrease in severity of scores in adolescents with depression (95% CI = 0.08, 1.70, p = .032) and 1.16 points increase in HVs' depressive symptoms (95% CI = 0.10, 2.23, p = .032). Compared to their pre-pandemic levels, adolescents with depression reported overall lower anxiety symptoms during the pandemic. Parent-on-child reports also were consistent with these results. CONCLUSION: Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that both depressive and anxiety symptoms were lower for adolescents with depression during the pandemic compared to before. In contrast, the depression scores for the HVs were higher during the pandemic relative to their pre-pandemic ratings; these scores remained much lower than those of adolescents with depression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Characterization and Treatment of Adolescent Depression; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03388606.

Clinical utility of family history of depression for prognosis of adolescent depression severity and duration assessed with predictive modeling.

BACKGROUND: Family history of depression (FHD) is a known risk factor for the new onset of depression. However, it is unclear if FHD is clinically useful for prognosis in adolescents with current, ongoing, or past depression. This preregistered study uses a longitudinal, multi-informant design to examine whether a child's FHD adds information about future depressive episodes and depression severity applying state-of-the-art predictive out-of-sample methodology. METHODS: We examined data in adolescents with current or past depression (age 11-17 years) from the National Institute of Mental Health Characterization and Treatment of Adolescent Depression (CAT-D) study. We asked whether a history of depression in a first-degree relative was predictive of depressive episode duration (72 participants) and future depressive symptom severity in probands (129 participants, 1,439 total assessments). RESULTS: Family history of depression, while statistically associated with time spent depressed, did not improve predictions of time spent depressed, nor did it improve models of change in depression severity measured by self- or parent-report. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of depression does not improve the prediction of the course of depression in adolescents already diagnosed with depression. The difference between statistical association and predictive models highlights the importance of assessing predictive performance when evaluating questions of clinical utility.

Habenula Connectivity and Intravenous Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine's potent and rapid antidepressant properties have shown great promise to treat severe forms of major depressive disorder (MDD). A recently hypothesized antidepressant mechanism of action of ketamine is the inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent bursting activity of the habenula (Hb), a small brain structure that modulates reward and affective states. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 35 patients with MDD at baseline and 24 hours following treatment with i.v. ketamine. A seed-to-voxel functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed with the Hb as a seed-of-interest. Pre-post changes in FC and the associations between changes in FC of the Hb and depressive symptom severity were examined. RESULTS: A reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to 24 hours after ketamine infusion was associated with increased FC between the right Hb and a cluster in the right frontal pole (t = 4.65, P = .03, false discovery rate [FDR]-corrected). A reduction in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report score following ketamine was associated with increased FC between the right Hb and clusters in the right occipital pole (t = 5.18, P < .0001, FDR-corrected), right temporal pole (t = 4.97, P < .0001, FDR-corrected), right parahippocampal gyrus (t = 5.80, P = .001, FDR-corrected), and left lateral occipital cortex (t = 4.73, P = .03, FDR-corrected). Given the small size of the Hb, it is possible that peri-habenular regions contributed to the results. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that the Hb might be involved in ketamine's antidepressant action in patients with MDD, although these findings are limited by the lack of a control group.

Using dalteparin in quotidian and nocturnal hemodialysis patients: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Low-molecular weight heparin, such as dalteparin, is an alternative anticoagulation method in conventional hemodialysis (HD). However, there are limited studies on its use in quotidian and nocturnal HD. We assessed the optimal dose, treatment efficacy, and patient safety of dalteparin in quotidian and nocturnal HD populations. METHODS: This study included 10 quotidian (7 in-center and 3 home) and 8 nocturnal home HD patients. Dalteparin was initiated and titrated based on clotting score in these patients. Trough anti-Xa levels were measured. The dalteparin dose, the dialyzer and HD circuit clotting scores, and bleeding episodes were recorded at 4 weeks. Patients who continued dalteparin were followed to 12 months. FINDINGS: For the 10 quotidian HD patients, the median dalteparin dose was 1875 units [1250, 2500] after 4 weeks. For nocturnal HD patients, five of the eight patients switched back to heparin due to high clotting scores while on dalteparin within 4 weeks. However, three patients continued on dalteparin at 4 weeks. After 12 months, one maintained on 5000 units and the other two maintained on 7500 units of dalteparin. All the clotting scores at month 12 were ≤2. One patient died due to an unrelated cause. For all patients who continued on dalteparin, only 9% of the HD treatments had circuit clotting score >2 after reaching stable dose. All trough anti-Xa levels were <0.1 IU/mL. There were no episodes of bleeding. Fistula compression times were not increased. DISCUSSION: This small pilot study suggests that dalteparin can be used effectively and relatively safety in quotidian HD. However, its use in nocturnal HD was only successful in a small proportion of patients. Alternative methods, including second dalteparin bolus after 4 hours of HD treatment, should be assessed for efficacy and practicality.

Sustained virological response rates with direct-acting antivirals in black subjects with HCV genotype 1 infection: systematic analysis of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: Under representation of black subjects in trials of hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) complicates assessment of differential outcomes for black individuals vs non-black individuals. HCV trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (2013-2017) to support approval or to expand an indication of 12-week interferon-free DAA regimens with or without ribavirin to treat HCV genotype 1 (GT1) infection were pooled to explore efficacy comparisons by ethnicity. METHODS: Twenty-six trials were pooled and included 2869 individuals with HCV GT1 alone and 742 individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV. RESULTS: Of the 2869 HCV GT1-mono-infected subjects, 408 (14.2%) were black. Sustained virological response assessed 12 weeks following cessation of treatment (SVR12) was 92%-100% in black individuals and 87.5%-100.0% in non-black individuals. In pooled analyses, SVR12 was numerically similar between black and non-black subjects (97.1% vs 97.3%). Baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for the two groups. Of the 742 subjects with both HCV GT1 and HIV, 243 (32.7%) were black: SVR12 was 89.5%-100% in black individuals and 94.4%-100% in non-black individuals. In pooled analyses for HCV GT1/HIV co-infection, black individuals had a 4% (95% confidence interval -7.7% to 0.3%) lower SVR12 than non-black individuals (93.4% vs 97.0%). This difference was driven by ION-4 in which study SVR12 was approximately 10% lower for black than for non-black individuals (89.5% vs 99.1%). Baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for the two groups. CONCLUSION: No notable SVR12 differences were seen in between black and non-black individuals with HCV GT1 alone. Although a numerical difference was observed between black and non-black individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV, this finding was driven by results from a single trial and may be due to reasons other than ethnicity: 19 subgroup analyses showed baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for black and non-black individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV.

Benefit-risk assessment for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir based on patient population and hepatitis C virus genotype: U. S. Food and Drug Administration's evaluation.

On July 18, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) (Vosevi) fixed-dose combination (FDC), an interferon-free, complete regimen for adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) who have: • genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor; and • genotype 1a or 3 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Approval was based on an acceptable safety profile and high sustained virological response rates 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) in two phase 3 clinical trials in subjects previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen. In POLARIS-1, 96% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. In POLARIS-4, 98% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. A key and challenging question in evaluating the data was determining the contribution of VOX to SOF/VEL and how this differed depending on the genotype and patient population. In this article, we provide our perspective on the issues considered in making these determinations, especially regarding the POLARIS-4 data in subjects who have previously been treated with a chronic HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Conclusion: We seek to provide context as to why a broad indication was given for NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients (HCV genotypes 1-6) while the indication for NS5A inhibitor- naïve patients was limited to HCV genotypes 1a and 3 only. (Hepatology 2018;67:482-491).

A note on partial covariate-adjustment and design considerations in noninferiority trials when patient-level data are not available.

The traditional fixed margin approach to evaluating an experimental treatment through an active-controlled noninferiority trial is simple and straightforward. However, its utility relies heavily on the constancy assumption of the experimental data. The recently developed covariate-adjustment method permits more flexibility and improved discriminatory capacity compared to the fixed margin approach. However, one major limitation of this covariate-adjustment methodology is its adherence on the patient-level data, which may not be accessible to investigators in practice. In this article, under some assumptions, we examine the feasibility of a partial covariate-adjustment approach based on data typically available from journal publications or other public data when the patient-level data are unavailable. We illustrate the usefulness of this approach through two real examples. We also provide design considerations on the efficiency of the partial covariate-adjustment approach.

Meta-analysis of gender differences in efficacy outcomes for HIV-positive subjects in randomized controlled clinical trials of antiretroviral therapy (2000-2008).

Women are often underrepresented in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of HIV-1 drugs. As a result, determining whether women have different virologic outcomes compared to men is not always possible because the gender-related analyses usually lack statistical power. To address this important public health concern, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Division of Antiviral Products (DAVP) created a database including 20,328 HIV-positive subjects from 40 RCTs in 18 New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted to the FDA between 2000 and 2008. These RCTs were conducted for at least 48 weeks in duration and were used to support approval of new molecular entity, new formulation, or major label change. To delineate potential gender differences in antiretroviral treatment (ART), we evaluated the percentage of subjects with HIV RNA less than 50 copies per milliliter at 48 weeks. Analyses of the database represent the most systematic review of gender-related ART efficacy data to date. Overall, the meta-analyses did not demonstrate statistically or clinically significant gender differences in virologic outcome at week 48. However, the corresponding subgroup analyses appear to show several statistically significant gender differences favoring males.

Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests (e.g., fecal occult blood testing [FOBT], flexible sigmoidoscopy [FS], etc.) are underused. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a critical role in screening, but barriers to and facilitators of screening as perceived by PCPs in managed care settings are poorly understood. The objectives of the current study were to describe current CRC screening practices and to explore determinants of test use by PCPs in a managed care setting. METHODS: In 2000, a self-administered survey was mailed to a stratified, random sample of 1340 PCPs in a large, network model health maintenance organization in California. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 67%. PCPs indicated that 79% of their standard-risk patients were screened for CRC. PCP-reported median rates of recommendation for the use of specific screening tests were 90% for FOBT and 70% for FS. In logistic regression models, perceived barriers to the use of FOBT and FS included patient characteristics (e.g., education) and PCP-related barriers (e.g., failure to recall that patients were due for testing). Perceived facilitators of the use of FOBT and FS included interventions targeting certain aspects of the health care system (e.g., reimbursement) and interventions targeting certain aspects of the tests themselves (e.g., provision of evidence of a test's effectiveness). Assignment of high priority to screening, integrated medical group (as opposed to independent practice association) affiliation, and the proportion of patients receiving routine health maintenance examinations were positively associated with reported test use. CONCLUSIONS: CRC screening tests appear to be underused in the managed care setting examined in the current study. The perceived barriers and facilitators that were identified can be used to guide interventions aimed at increasing recommendations for, as well as actual performance of, CRC screening.

Validity of self-reporting of episodes of external genital warts.

To determine whether men are able to self-diagnose external genital warts (EGWs), we studied data from 1115 men with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Men were largely unable to accurately assess the presence of EGWs. Self-reporting of EGWs was not a sensitive tool; only 38% of men who had EGWs diagnosed by a trained examiner who used bright light and visual inspection also reported having them. When we controlled for other covariates in a multivariate model, men who had EGWs diagnosed by an examiner were 14 times less likely to show concordance between examiner findings and self-report than were men who did not have EGWs diagnosed by an examiner (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.09). Self-diagnosis and self-assessment may not accurately reflect the presence of EGWs, and self-diagnosis should not be used in place of an examiner's findings for epidemiologic studies that seek to determine the cause of disease.