ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop a scale to assess infectious disease-specific health literacy (IDSHL) in China and test its initial psychometric properties. METHODS: Item pooling, reduction and assessment of psychometric properties were conducted. The scale was divided into 2 subscales; subscale 1 assessed an individual's skills to prevent/treat infectious diseases and subscale 2 assessed cognitive ability. In 2014, 9000 people aged 15-69â years were randomly sampled from 3 provinces and asked to complete the IDSHL questionnaire. Cronbach's α was calculated to assess reliability. Exploratory factor analysis, t-test, correlations, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression were used to examine validity. RESULTS: Each of the 22 items in subscale 1 had a content validity index >0.8. In total, 8858 people completed the scale. The principal components factor analysis suggested a 5-factor solution. All factor loadings were >0.40 (p<0.05). The IDSHL score was 22.07±7.91 (mean±SD; total score=38.62). Significant differences were observed across age (r=-0.276), sex (males: 21.65±8.03; females: 22.47±7.78), education (14.16±8.19 to 26.55±6.26), 2-week morbidity (present: 20.62±8.17, absent: 22.35±7.83; p<0.001) and health literacy of the highest and lowest 27% score groups (all p<0.05). The ROC curve indicated that 76.2% of respondents were adequate in IDSHL. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed 12 predictors of IDSHL adequacy (p<0.05). Among the 22 remaining items, Corrected Item-Total Correlation ranged from 0.316 to 0.504 and Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.754 to 0.810 if the items were deleted. The overall α value was 0.839 and the difficulty coefficient ranged from 1.19 to 4.08. For subscale 2, there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of those with a correct/incorrect answer (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed 28-item scale provides an efficient, psychometrically sound and user-friendly measure of IDSHL in the Chinese population.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/psychology , Health Literacy/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , China , Cognition , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/methods , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnosis and treatment and prognosis of sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of 11 cases with sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from 1998 to 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Ten cases were small cell type and one case was atypical carcinoid. One case by only operation, one case by only radiotherapy, one case by only chemotherapy, two cases by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, 6 cases by combined treatment based on surgery (surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy). RESULTS: All cases have been followed up for 2 months to 12 years. Six cases by combined treatment one case died in 3 years and one case died in 4 years after treatment, one case has survived without tumor for 12 years and two cases have survived without tumor for 8 years, one case was still in treatment. Five cases of other treatment programs, four cases died in 12 months, one case died in 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: There's no standard treatment plan. Combined treatment based on surgery should be adopted to nasal neuroendocrine carcinoma. Reccurrence is frequent and the prognosis is poor. The key to improving the survival rate of the disease is early accurate diagnosis and combined treatment.