Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 15(12): 2844-2854, 2023 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38221998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Study showed that systemic holistic care not only aids in disease treatment and physical recovery to a certain extent but also effectively enhances patient psychological well-being, social support, and overall quality of life (QoL). AIM: To assess systematic holistic care impact on the recovery and well-being of postoperative patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Our randomized controlled trial included 98 postoperative patients with colon cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2021 to June 2022. Patients were divided into control and study groups. The control group received conventional postoperative nursing care, whereas the study group received systematic holistic nursing care. We monitored gastrointestinal function recovery, and recorded changes in serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), psychological state, self-management, self-efficacy, QoL, and the occurrence of complications in patients before, at discharge, and 2 wk post-discharge. Spearman analysis assessed correlations between psychological state, self-management, self-efficacy, and QoL of patients in the study group 2 wk post-discharge. RESULTS: Following the nursing intervention, we observed significantly shorter postoperative bowel sound recovery time, anal exhaust time, and defecation time in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Patient ALB and PA levels, psychological status, self-management ability, self-efficacy and QoL at discharge and 2 wk post-discharge significantly improved, with greater improvements observed in the study group (P < 0.05). Both groups experienced complications post-interventions, but the intervention group had significantly lower complication rate (3/49, 6.12%) (P < 0.05). In the study group, patient anxiety, depression, self-management and QoL scores at 2 wk post-discharge exhibited a significant negative correlation (3/49, 6.12%) with QoL scores, with correlation coefficients of r = -0.273, -0.522, -0.344, and P < 0.01, respectively. Conversely, patient self-efficacy scores 2 wk post-discharge showed a positive correlation with QoL scores (r = 0.410, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Systemic holistic nursing significantly benefits postoperative patients with colon cancer by promoting gastrointestinal recovery, improving post-operation well-being, reducing complications, and enhancing QoL.

2.
Aging Med (Milton) ; 3(2): 74-81, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666025

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was first detected in patients with pneumonia of an unknown cause in Wuhan, China in December 2019. It has since been confirmed as the pathogen for the new coronavirus pneumonia, recently named "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization. Although the general population is commonly susceptible to the disease, infected elderly people show fast progression and severe manifestations with a high proportion in critical condition as a result of compromised immunity and underlying diseases. In order to improve the quality of nursing, reduce complications, and decrease mortality of critically ill elderly patients, we assembled a national expert group with expertise in critical nursing to write this consensus, based on a literature review and a subsequent panel discussion. The consensus covers the assessment, clinical nursing, discharge care, and other aspects of care for critically ill elderly patients with COVID-19, aiming to share insights and provide guidance for clinical practice.

3.
Int J Clin Exp Med ; 7(6): 1542-53, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25035778

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis was to summarize the published studies about the association between red/processed meat consumption and the risk of lung cancer. 5 databases were systematically reviewed, and random-effect model was used to pool the study results and to assess dose-response relationships. Results shown that six cohort studies and twenty eight case-control studies were included in this meat-analysis. The pooled Risk Radios (RR) for total red meat and processed meat were 1.44 (95% CI, 1.29-1.61) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.10-1.37), respectively. Dose-response analysis revealed that for every increment of 120 grams red meat per day the risk of lung cancer increases 35% and for every increment of 50 grams red meat per day the risk of lung cancer increases 20%. The present dose-response meta-analysis suggested that both red and processed meat consumption showed a positive effect on lung cancer risk.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...