Operative Effect Comparison of Flexible Drill Guiding vs. Traditional Drill Guiding Template for Lower Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Accurately inserting pedicle screws is the key point of posterior pedicle screw fixation for lower cervical spine (C3-C7) instability. 3D printing technology can improve the accuracy of screw placement. This study compared the safety of 3D-printed flexible drill guiding template vs. traditional rigid drill guiding template for lower cervical pedicle screw insertion. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 34 patients who underwent lower cervical pedicle screw fixation from March 2018 to May 2021 were enrolled in this study, and they were divided into the flexible drill flexible drill group and the traditional drill group. A total of 18 patients in the flexible drill flexible drill group underwent pedicle screw fixation assisted by 3D printed flexible drill guiding templates for the lower cervix, and 16 patients in the traditional drill group underwent pedicle screw fixation assisted by 3D printed regular drill guiding templates for the lower cervix. The length of the incision and intraoperative blood loss during surgery were recorded and compared for the two groups. The grade, deviation of the screw entry point, deviation of the screw medial angle and screw length were measured and compared after surgery for the two groups by independent-sample tests. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the length of the incision and blood loss between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups for grade (P = 0.016). The deviation of the screw entry point was 0.65 ± 0.50 mm in the flexible drill group and 0.78 ± 0.83 mm in the traditional drill group. The deviation of the screw medial angle was 2.14 ± 1.78 in the flexible drill group and 4.23 ± 2.51 in the traditional drill group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with regular guiding techniques, lower cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by multistep navigation templates and flexible K-wires results in less trauma and better safety.

Finite Element Analysis and Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring with Sacrum Dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior pelvic ring sacroiliac screws are preferred by clinicians for their good biomechanical performance. However, there are few studies on mechanical analysis and intraoperative screw insertion of the dysplastic sacrum and sacroiliac screw. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of oblique sacroiliac screws (OSS) in S1 combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTSs) in S2 for pelvic fracture or sacroiliac dislocation with dysplastic sacrum and evaluated the safety of screw placement assisted by the navigation template. METHODS: Six models were established, including one OSS fixation in the S2 segment, one transverse sacroiliac screw (TSS) fixation in the S2 segment, one TTS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 and S2 segments, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TSS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TTS fixation in the S2 segment. Then, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed. Twelve dysplastic sacrum patients with pelvis fracture or sacroiliac dislocation underwent OSS insertion in the S1 combined with TTS insertion in the S2 under the assistance of the patient-specific locked navigation template. Grading and Matta scores were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: In the one-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of S2 OSS, S2 TSS and S2 TTS were 1.23, 1.42, and 1.22 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 139.45 MPa, 144.81 MPa, 126.14 MPa, respectively. In the two-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of the S1 OSS + S2 OSS, S1 OSS + S2 TSS and S1 OSS + S2 TTS were 0.91, 1.06, and 0.75 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 149.26 MPa, 167.13 Pa, 136.76 MPa, respectively. Clinically, a total of 12 TTS and OSS were inserted under the assistance of navigation templates, with a surgical time of 55 ± 7.69 min, bleeding of 57.5 ± 18.15 ml and radiation times of 14.5 ± 4.95. One of the TTS and one of the OSS were grade 1, and the other screws were grade 0. The Matta scores of nine patients were excellent, and three patents were good. CONCLUSION: OSS in the S1 combined with TTS in the S2 had the best mechanical stability in six models, and it is safe for screw insertion assisted by the patient-specific locked navigation template.

Comparison of Perpendicular to the Coronal Plane versus Medial Inclination for C2 Pedicle Screw Insertion Assisted by 3D Printed Navigation Template.

OBJECTIVE: C2 pedicle screw insertion is very important in posterior upper cervical surgery. The traditional screw placement technique requires us to consider both medial inclination and cephalad angle, it is difficult to operate intraoperatively. This paper is to explore a novel method of C2 pedicle screw placement compared with traditional C2 pedicle screw. METHODS: A total of 44 patients diagnosed with atlantoaxial fracture or instability from May 2018 to November 2020 were involved in this retrospective study, and they were divided into C2-PPS group (perpendicular to the coronal plane C2 screw, 24 patients) and C2-TPS group (traditional C2 pedicle screw, 20 patients). The diameter of the maximum tangential circle, distance between geometric center and median sagittal plane and screw length of PPS and TPS were measured based on the 3D model of C2, respectively. Then the 3D printed navigation templated were designed and manufactured by 3D printing to assisted the PPS and TPS placement, respectively. The surgical time and radiation exposure times during operation were recorded; the post-operative grading criteria, deviation of screw entry point and deviation of screw angle of two groups were evaluated, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 48 screws were inserted in the C2-PPS group, and 40 screws were inserted in the C2-TPS group. There were 46 screws with grade 0 (95.8%) in the PPS group and 31 screws with grade 0 (77.5%) in the TPS group, (P = 0.03). The radiation exposure times in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 4.7 ± 1.5 and 7.8 ± 3.8, respectively, (P = 0.045). The deviations of screw entry point in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 1.2 ± 0.8 mm and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm, respectively; the deviations of screw angle in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 2.1 ± 1.6° and 4.8 ± 2.0°, respectively, (P = 0.000). The diameters of the maximum tangential circle in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 5.5 ± 1.0 mm and 5.3 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The distances between the geometric center and median sagittal plane in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 15.4 ± 2.3 mm and 18.0 ± 3.3 mm, respectively; The screw lengths in the C2-PPS group and C2-TPS group were 25.9 ± 3.2 mm and 27.6 ± 3.7 mm, respectively, (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of C2-PPS corridor can accommodate a 3.5 mm diameter screw, and with an average screw length of 26 mm. Navigation templates assisted the C2-PPS placement is less surgical time, less radiation exposure times, more safe and more accurate than C2-TPS.