Frailty and postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients: a systematic review subdivided by tumor etiology.

PURPOSE: Frailty has gained prominence in neurosurgical oncology, with more studies exploring its relationship to postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients. As this body of literature continues to grow, concisely reviewing recent developments in the field is necessary. Here we provide a systematic review of frailty in brain tumor patients subdivided by tumor type, incorporating both modern frailty indices and traditional Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) metrics. METHODS: Systematic literature review was performed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were queried for articles related to frailty, KPS, and brain tumor outcomes. Only articles describing novel associations between frailty or KPS and primary intracranial tumors were included. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria, systematic review yielded 52 publications. Amongst malignant lesions, 16 studies focused on glioblastoma. Amongst benign tumors, 13 focused on meningiomas, and 6 focused on vestibular schwannomas. Seventeen studies grouped all brain tumor patients together. Seven studies incorporated both frailty indices and KPS into their analyses. Studies correlated frailty with various postoperative outcomes, including complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our review identified several patterns of overall postsurgical outcomes reporting for patients with brain tumors and frailty. To date, reviews of frailty in patients with brain tumors have been largely limited to certain frailty indices, analyzing all patients together regardless of lesion etiology. Although this technique is beneficial in providing a general overview of frailty's use for brain tumor patients, given each tumor pathology has its own unique etiology, this combined approach potentially neglects key nuances governing frailty's use and prognostic value.

Associations of race and socioeconomic status with outcomes after intracranial meningioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health broadly affect healthcare access and outcomes. Studies report that minorities and low socioeconomic status (SES) patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection demonstrate worse outcomes and higher mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the available research reporting racial and SES disparities in intracranial meningioma resection outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and included peer-reviewed, English-language articles from the United States between 2000 and 2022 that reported racial and SES disparities in meningioma outcomes. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), extent of resection (EOR), hospitalization costs, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, recurrence, and receipt of surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed only on survival outcomes by race. All other variables were summarized as a systematic review. RESULTS: 633 articles were identified; 19 studies met inclusion criteria. Black or low SES patients were more likely to have increased hospitalization costs, rates of 30-day readmission, LOS, recurrence and less likely to undergo surgery, gross total resection, and adjuvant radiotherapy for their tumors. Six studies were used for the quantitative meta-analysis of race and OS. Compared to White patients, Black patients had significantly worse survival outcomes, and Asian patients had significantly better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: Disparities in outcomes exist for patients who undergo surgery for meningioma, such that Black and low SES patients have worse outcomes. The literature is quite sparse and contains confounding relationships not often accounted for appropriately. Further studies are needed to help understand these disparities to improve outcomes.