Reducing the Frequency of Surveillance Blood Work in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Local Quality Improvement Initiative.

Introduction: There is little evidence on the ideal frequency of routine blood work in maintenance dialysis patients to manage complications, including anemia, mineral bone disease (MBD), and hyperkalemia. Recent quality improvement studies from Ontario showed no negative impacts when decreasing the frequency from monthly to every 6 weeks in conventional in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients. In December 2020, Alberta Kidney Care-South (AKC-S) reduced the frequency of routine blood work from every 6 weeks to every 8 weeks for ICHD patients. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of reducing blood work frequency on patient outcomes. Methods: We compared prevalent AKC-S ICHD patients in 2 cohorts: (1) retrospective control (October 31, 2019-October 31, 2020) and (2) prospective intervention (December 1, 2020-December 1, 2021). Primary outcomes were true frequency of routine blood work, odds of patients being within target for anemia and MBD, and proportion of lab values of hyperkalemia. Furthermore, we compared hospitalizations and mortality. Results: A total of 972 patients in Calgary's ICHD program were included, 787 in each period (with 602 patients overlapping both cohorts). The frequency of routine blood work decreased from every 39.5 days in the control period to every 54.2 days in the intervention period (P < .01). There was a reduction in the odds of phosphate values in targets (P = .02), and an increase in the odds of labs with hyperkalemia (>6.0 mmol/L) during the intervention period (P = .01). There was no significant change in the odds of being within the accepted targets during the intervention period compared with the control period for hemoglobin, Tsat, calcium, or parathyroid hormone (PTH). Fewer patients were hospitalized during the intervention period and the risk of death decreased as well, although additional factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected this. A cost-savings of $32 962 occurred from the reduced anemia and MBD blood work during the intervention period. Conclusions: When ICHD units in Calgary reduced routine blood work frequency from every 6 weeks to 8 weeks, there were no negative impacts on hospitalizations or deaths. A slightly lower proportion of phosphate values were within target, and a 0.7% increase in potassium values greater than 6 mmol/L was demonstrated. Our study suggests that blood work frequency in ICHD dialysis patients may be further reduced to every 8 weeks safely. Ultimately, additional pragmatic trials are needed to identify the optimal frequency of routine blood work.

Introduction: Il existe peu de données quant à la fréquence idéale des analyses sanguines chez les patients sous dialyse d'entretien pour gérer les complications comme l'anémie, les troubles liés à la densité osseuse (TDO) et l'hyperkaliémie. De récentes études d'amélioration de la qualité menées en Ontario n'ont montré aucune conséquence négative lorsque la fréquence des analyses des patients traités de façon traditionnelle par hémodialyse en centre (HDC) est passée d'une fois par mois à une fois toutes les 6 semaines. L'Alberta Kidney Care-South (AKC-S) a réduit la fréquence des analyses sanguines de routine; depuis décembre 2020, les analyses des patients traités par HDC sont effectuées toutes les 8 semaines plutôt qu'aux 6 semaines. Objectif: Évaluer les effets d'une réduction de la fréquence des analyses sanguines sur les résultats des patients. Méthodologie: Nous avons comparé des patients de l'AKC-S prévalents pour l'HDC dans deux cohortes: a) période témoin ­ rétrospective (31 octobre 2019 au 31 octobre 2020); b) période d'intervention ­ prospective (1er décembre 2020 au 1er décembre 2021). Les principaux critères d'évaluation étaient la fréquence réelle des analyses sanguines de routine, la probabilité que les patients soient dans la cible pour l'anémie et les TDO, et dans la fourchette cible des valeurs de laboratoire pour l'hyperkaliémie. Les hospitalisations et la mortalité ont également été comparées entre les deux cohortes. Résultats: Au total, 972 patients du programme d'HDC de Calgary ont été inclus, soit deux cohortes de 787 patients (602 patients ont chevauché les deux cohortes). Les analyses sanguines étaient effectuées tous les 39,5 jours pendant la période témoin; cette fréquence est passée aux 54,2 jours pendant la période d'intervention (p<0,01). On a observé une réduction des probabilités que le taux de phosphate soit dans les cibles (p=0,02) et une augmentation des valeurs de laboratoire montrant une hyperkaliémie (>6,0 mmol/L) pendant la période d'intervention (p=0,01). Aucun changement significatif n'a été observé entre les deux périodes en ce qui concerne la probabilité que les valeurs de laboratoire soient dans les cibles acceptées pour l'hémoglobine, le TSAT, le calcium ou la PTH. Pendant la période d'intervention, moins de patients ont été hospitalisés et le risque de décès a diminué, mais d'autres facteurs, notamment la pandémie de COVID-19, ont pu influer sur ce résultat. Enfin, le fait de réduire la fréquence des analyses de suivi pour l'anémie et les TDO a entraîné des économies de 32 962 $. Conclusion: Aucune conséquence négative n'a été observée lorsque la fréquence des analyses sanguines des patients des unités d'hémodialyse en centre de Calgary est passée de 6 à 8 semaines. Une proportion légèrement plus faible des valeurs de phosphate se situait dans la fourchette cible et une augmentation de 0,7 % des valeurs de potassium supérieures à 6 mmol/L a été constatée. Notre étude suggère qu'il est sécuritaire d'effectuer les analyses sanguines des patients hémodialysés en centre toutes les 8 semaines. Des essais pragmatiques sont nécessaires pour déterminer la fréquence optimale de ces analyses.

Reduction in Thrombolytic Usage in Hemodialysis Patients Following a Quality Assurance Review: A Research Letter.

Background: Catheter malfunction in hemodialysis (HD) is increasingly managed with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA, alteplase), though evidence of improved catheter function is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a standardized rt-PA administration protocol on rt-PA usage, catheter function, and adverse events. Design: Observational quality improvement study. Setting: Single, urban, community HD unit in Calgary, Alberta. Patients: Patients treated with maintenance in-center HD through central venous catheter. Outcomes: Incidence of rt-PA usage, catheter interventions, hospitalizations, and measures of dialysis efficacy. Methods: The rt-PA protocol was designed following a consultative and iterative design period with dialysis shareholders, which included focusing on standard objective criteria before use and targeting use to the problematic lumen. Protocol implementation occurred over a 6-month period in 2021. Patient and dialysis data were collected through our regional dialysis electronic health record. Results: Implementation of the rt-PA protocol resulted in decreased rt-PA use (standardized per 100 dialysis sessions) compared to the preprotocol period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] of 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.94]). Line procedures were also less frequent (IRR = 0.42, 95% CI: [0.18, 0.89]). Hospitalization rates and measures of dialysis efficacy were similar in both periods. Limitations: Small sample size with single dialysis center and short duration of follow-up. Conclusions: Implementation of a multidisciplinary designed rt-PA administration protocol decreased incident rt-PA usage.

Contexte: L'activateur tissulaire du plasminogène recombinant (rt-PA, alteplase) est de plus en plus utilisé pour la prise en charge du dysfonctionnement du cathéter en hémodialyse, bien qu'on manque de preuves sur l'amélioration de la fonction du cathéter. Objectif: Évaluer l'effet d'un protocole normalisé d'administration de rt-PA sur l'utilization de rt-PA, la fonction du cathéter et les événements indésirables. Type d'étude: Étude observationnelle d'amélioration de la qualité. Cadre: L'unité d'hémodialyse communautaire d'un center urbain de Calgary (Alberta). Sujets: Patients traités en center par hémodialyse d'entretien avec cathéter veineux central. Résultats: Mesure de l'efficacité de la dialyze et incidence de l'utilization du rt-PA, des interventions par cathéter et des hospitalisations. Méthodologie: Le protocole rt-PA a été élaboré après une période de consultation et d'itération auprès des intervenants en dialyze qui consistait à mettre l'accent sur les critères objectifs normalisés avant son utilization et à cibler son utilization dans la lumière problématique du cathéter. La mise en œuvre du protocole s'est déroulée sur une période de 6 mois en 2021. Les données sur les patients et les séances de dialyze ont été recueillies par le biais du dossier médical électronique régional pour la dialyze. Résultats: La mise en œuvre du protocole rt-PA a entraîné une diminution de l'utilization de rt-PA (normalisée pour 100 séances de dialyze) par rapport à la période pré-protocole (rapport du taux d'incidence [RTI] de 0,57; intervalle de confiance à 95% [IC 95 %] de 0.34 à 0.94). Les interventions au niveau des cathéters ont également été moins fréquentes (RTI: 0.42; IC 95 %: 0.18-0.89). Les taux d'hospitalization et les mesures de l'efficacité de la dialyze étaient semblables pour les deux périodes. Limites: Étude menée dans un seul center de dialyze, sur un échantillon de petite taille, avec un suivi de courte durée. Conclusion: La mise en œuvre d'un protocole d'administration de rt-PA conçu de façon multidisciplinaire a diminué l'incidence de l'utilization de rt-PA.

Four steps to standardize reporting of peritoneal dialysis technique failure: A proposed approach.

BACKGROUND: Technique failure is an important outcome measure in research and quality improvement in peritoneal dialysis (PD) programs, but there is a lack of consistency in how it is reported. METHODS: We used data collected about incident dialysis patients from 10 Canadian dialysis programs between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2018. We identified four main steps that are required when calculating the risk of technique failure. We changed one variable at a time, and then all steps, simultaneously, to determine the impact on the observed risk of technique failure at 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 1448 patients received PD. Selecting different cohorts of PD patients changed the observed risk of technique failure at 24 months by 2%. More than one-third of patients who switched to hemodialysis returned to PD-90% returned within 180 days. The use of different time windows of observation for a return to PD resulted in risks of technique failure that differed by 16%. The way in which exit events were handled during the time window impacted the risk of technique failure by 4% and choice of statistical method changed results by 4%. Overall, the observed risk of technique failure at 24 months differed by 20%, simply by applying different approaches to the same data set. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to reporting technique failure has an important impact on the observed results. We present a robust and transparent methodology to track technique failure over time and to compare performance between programs.

Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists COVID-19 Rapid Response: Home and In-Center Dialysis Guidance.

PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM: This article provides guidance on optimizing the management of pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who will be or are being treated with any form of home or in-center dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goals are to provide the best possible care for pediatric patients with ESKD during the pandemic and ensure the health care team's safety. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The core of these rapid guidelines is derived from the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) consensus recommendations for adult patients recently published in the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD). We also consulted specific documents from other national and international agencies focused on pediatric kidney health. Additional information was obtained by formal review of the published academic literature relevant to pediatric home or in-center hemodialysis. METHODS: The Leadership of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists (CAPN), which is affiliated with the CSN, solicited a team of clinicians and researchers with expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis. The goal was to adapt the guidelines recently adopted for Canadian adult dialysis patients for pediatric-specific settings. These included specific COVID-19-related themes that apply to dialysis in a Canadian environment, as determined by a group of senior renal leaders. Expert clinicians and nurses with deep expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis reviewed the revised pediatric guidelines. KEY FINDINGS: We identified 7 broad areas of home dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) peritoneal dialysis catheter placement, (2) home dialysis training, (3) home dialysis management, (4) personal protective equipment, (5) product delivery, (6) minimizing direct health care providers and patient contact, and (7) caregivers support in the community. In addition, we identified 8 broad areas of in-center dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) identification of patients with COVID-19, (2) hemodialysis of patients with confirmed COVID-19, (3) hemodialysis of patients not yet known to have COVID-19, (4) management of visitors to the dialysis unit, (5) handling COVID-19 testing of patients and staff, (6) safe practices during resuscitation procedures in a pandemic, (7) routine hemodialysis care, and (8) hemodialysis care under fixed dialysis resources. We make specific suggestions and recommendations for each of these areas. LIMITATIONS: At the time when we started this work, we knew that evidence on the topic of pediatric dialysis and COVID-19 would be severely limited, and our resources were also limited. We did not, therefore, do formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. Thus, this article's advice and recommendations are primarily expert opinions and subject to the biases associated with this level of evidence. To expedite the publication of this work, we created a parallel review process that may not be as robust as standard arms' length peer-review processes. IMPLICATIONS: We intend these recommendations to help provide the best care possible for pediatric patients prescribed in-center or home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of altered priorities and reduced resources.

Exploring the Link Between Hepatic Perfusion and Endotoxemia in Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: The liver receives gut-derived endotoxin via the portal vein, clearing it before it enters systemic circulation. Hemodialysis negatively impacts the perfusion and function of multiple organs systems. Dialysate cooling reduces hemodialysis-induced circulatory stress and protects organs from ischemic injury. This study examined how hemodialysis disrupts liver hemodynamics and function, its effect on endotoxemia, and the potential protective effect of dialysate cooling. METHODS: Fifteen patients were randomized to receive either standard (36.5°C dialysate temperature) or cooled (35.0°C) hemodialysis first in a two-visit crossover trial. We applied computed tomography (CT) liver perfusion imaging to patients before, 3 hours into and after each hemodialysis session. We measured hepatic perfusion and perfusion heterogeneity. Hepatic function was measured by indocyanine green (ICG) clearance. Endotoxin levels in blood throughout dialysis were also measured. RESULTS: During hemodialysis, overall liver perfusion did not significantly change, but portal vein perfusion trended towards increasing (P = 0.14) and perfusion heterogeneity significantly increased (P = 0.038). In addition, ICG clearance decreased significantly during hemodialysis (P = 0.016), and endotoxin levels trended towards increasing during hemodialysis (P = 0.15) and increased significantly after hemodialysis (P = 0.037). Applying dialysate cooling trended towards abrogating these changes but did not reach statistical significance compared to standard hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Hemodialysis redistributes liver perfusion, attenuates hepatic function, and results in endotoxemia. Higher endotoxin levels in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients may result from the combination of decreased hepatic clearance function and increasing fraction of liver perfusion coming from toxin-laden portal vein during hemodialysis. The protective potential of dialysate cooling should be explored further in future research studies.

Management of Outpatient Hemodialysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations From the Canadian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Rapid Response Team.

PURPOSE: To collate best practice recommendations on the management of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on published reports and current public health advice, while considering ethical principles and the unique circumstances of Canadian hemodialysis units across the country. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The workgroup members used Internet search engines to retrieve documents from provincial and local hemodialysis programs; provincial public health agencies; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; webinars and slides from other kidney agencies; and nonreviewed preprints. PubMed was used to search for peer-reviewed published articles. Informal input was sought from knowledge users during a webinar. METHODS: Challenges in the care of hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were highlighted within the Canadian Senior Renal Leaders Forum discussion group. The Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) developed the COVID-19 rapid response team (RRT) to address these challenges. They identified a pan-Canadian team of clinicians and administrators with expertise in hemodialysis to form the workgroup. One lead was chosen who drafted the initial document. Members of the workgroup reviewed and discussed all recommendations in detail during 2 virtual meetings on April 7 and April 9. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The document was reviewed by the CSN COVID-19 RRT, an ethicist, an infection control expert, a community nephrologist, and a patient partner. Content was presented during an interactive webinar on April 11, 2020 attended by 269 kidney health professionals, and the webinar and first draft of the document were posted online. Final revisions were made based on feedback received until April 13, 2020. CJKHD editors reviewed the parallel process peer review and edited the manuscript for clarity. KEY FINDINGS: Recommendations were made under the following themes: (1) Identification of patients with COVID-19 in the dialysis unit, (2) hemodialysis of patients with confirmed COVID-19, (3) hemodialysis of patients not yet known to have COVID-19, (4) visitors; (5) testing for COVID-19 in the dialysis unit; (6) resuscitation, (6) routine hemodialysis care, (7) hemodialysis care under fixed dialysis resources. LIMITATIONS: Because of limitations of time and resources, and the large number of questions, formal systematic review was not undertaken. The recommendations are based on expert opinion and subject to bias. The parallel review process that was created may not be as robust as the standard peer review process. IMPLICATIONS: We hope that these recommendations provide guidance for dialysis unit directors, clinicians, and administrators on how to limit risk from infection and adverse outcomes, while providing necessary dialysis care in a setting of finite resources. We also identify a number of resource allocation priorities, which we hope will inform decisions at provincial funding agencies.

Canadian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Rapid Response Team Home Dialysis Recommendations.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: This paper will provide guidance on how to best manage patients with end-stage kidney disease who will be or are being treated with home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Program-specific documents, pre-existing, and related to COVID-19; documents from national and international kidney agencies; national and international webinars, including webinars that we hosted for input and feedback; with additional information from formal and informal review of published academic literature. METHODS: Members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) Board of Directors solicited a team of clinicians and administrators with expertise in home dialysis. Specific COVID-19-related themes in home dialysis were determined by the Canadian senior renal leaders community of practice, a group compromising medical and administrative leaders of provincial and health authority renal programs. We then developed consensus-based recommendations virtually by the CSN work-group with input from ethicists with nephrology training. The recommendations were further reviewed by community nephrologists and over a CSN-sponsored webinar, attended by 225 kidney health care professionals, for further peer input. The final consensus recommendations also incorporated review by the editors at the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD). KEY FINDINGS: We identified 7 broad areas of home dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) peritoneal dialysis catheter placement, (2) home dialysis training, (3) home dialysis management, (4) personal protective equipment, (5) product delivery, (6) minimizing direct health care provider and patient contact, and (7) assisted peritoneal dialysis in the community. We make specific suggestions and recommendations for each of these areas. LIMITATIONS: This suggestions and recommendations in this paper are expert opinion, and subject to the biases associated with this level of evidence. To expedite the publication of this work, a parallel review process was created that may not be as robust as standard arms' length peer-review processes. IMPLICATIONS: These recommendations are intended to provide the best care possible during a time of altered priorities and reduced resources.

Tissue sodium concentrations in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients by lower leg sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging (23Na MRI) allows direct measurement of tissue sodium concentrations. Current knowledge of skin, muscle and bone sodium concentrations in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal replacement therapy patients is limited. In this study we measured the tissue sodium concentrations in CKD, hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with 23Na MRI of the lower leg and explored their correlations with established clinical biomarkers. METHODS: Ten healthy controls, 12 CKD Stages 3-5, 13 HD and 10 PD patients underwent proton and 23Na MRI of the leg. The skin, soleus and tibia were segmented manually and tissue sodium concentrations were measured. Plasma and serum samples were collected from each subject and analyzed for routine clinical biomarkers. Tissue sodium concentrations were compared between groups and correlations with blood-based biomarkers were explored. RESULTS: Tissue sodium concentrations in the skin, soleus and tibia were higher in HD and PD patients compared with controls. Serum albumin showed a strong, negative correlation with soleus sodium concentrations in HD patients (r = -0.81, P < 0.01). Estimated glomerular filtration rate showed a negative correlation with tissue sodium concentrations (soleus: r = -0.58, P < 0.01; tibia: r = -0.53, P = 0.01) in merged control-CKD patients. Hemoglobin was negatively correlated with tissue sodium concentrations in CKD (soleus: r = -0.65, P = 0.02; tibia: r = -0.73, P < 0.01) and HD (skin: r = -0.60, P = 0.04; tibia: r = -0.76, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Tissue sodium concentrations, measured by 23Na MRI, increase in HD and PD patients and may be associated with adverse metabolic effects in CKD and dialysis.

Renal Perfusion during Hemodialysis: Intradialytic Blood Flow Decline and Effects of Dialysate Cooling.

BACKGROUND: Residual renal function (RRF) confers survival in patients with ESRD but declines after initiating hemodialysis. Previous research shows that dialysate cooling reduces hemodialysis-induced circulatory stress and protects the brain and heart from ischemic injury. Whether hemodialysis-induced circulatory stress affects renal perfusion, and if it can be ameliorated with dialysate cooling to potentially reduce RRF loss, is unknown. METHODS: We used renal computed tomography perfusion imaging to scan 29 patients undergoing continuous dialysis under standard (36.5°C dialysate temperature) conditions; we also scanned another 15 patients under both standard and cooled (35.0°C) conditions. Imaging was performed immediately before, 3 hours into, and 15 minutes after hemodialysis sessions. We used perfusion maps to quantify renal perfusion. To provide a reference to another organ vulnerable to hemodialysis-induced ischemic injury, we also used echocardiography to assess intradialytic myocardial stunning. RESULTS: During standard hemodialysis, renal perfusion decreased 18.4% (P<0.005) and correlated with myocardial injury (r=-0.33; P<0.05). During sessions with dialysis cooling, patients experienced a 10.6% decrease in perfusion (not significantly different from the decline with standard hemodialysis), and ten of the 15 patients showed improved or no effect on myocardial stunning. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an acute decrease in renal perfusion during hemodialysis, a first step toward pathophysiologic characterization of hemodialysis-mediated RRF decline. Dialysate cooling ameliorated this decline but this effect did not reach statistical significance. Further study is needed to explore the potential of dialysate cooling as a therapeutic approach to slow RRF decline.

Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmia with Citalopram and Escitalopram: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of ventricular arrhythmia with citalopram and escitalopram is controversial. In this study we investigated the association between these two drugs and the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of older adults (mean age 76 years) from 2002 to 2012 in Ontario, Canada, newly prescribed citalopram (n = 137 701) or escitalopram (n = 38 436), compared to those prescribed referent antidepressants sertraline or paroxetine (n = 96 620). After inverse probability of treatment weighting using a propensity score, the baseline characteristics of the comparison groups were similar. The primary outcome was a hospital encounter with ventricular arrhythmia within 90 days of a new prescription, assessed using hospital diagnostic codes. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days. RESULTS: Citalopram was associated with a higher risk of a hospital encounter with ventricular arrhythmia compared with referent antidepressants (0.06% vs. 0.04%, relative risk [RR] 1.53, 95% confidence intervals [CI]1.03 to 2.29), and a higher risk of mortality (3.49% vs. 3.12%, RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.18). Escitalopram was not associated with a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia compared with the referent antidepressants (0.03% vs. 0.04%, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.68), but was associated with a higher risk of mortality (2.86% vs. 2.63%, RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18). CONCLUSION: Among older adults, initiation of citalopram compared to two referent antidepressants was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in the 90-day risk of a hospital encounter for ventricular arrhythmia.