New US capsule endoscopy for superficial and submucosal imaging of the esophagus: the first-in-human study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS is essential in diagnosing and staging of esophageal subepithelial lesions and tumors. However, EUS is invasive, relies on highly trained endoscopists, and typically requires sedation. The newly developed US capsule endoscopy (USCE), which incorporates both white-light and US imaging modalities into a tethered capsule, is a minimally invasive method for obtaining superficial and submucosal information of the esophagus. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of this USCE system. METHODS: Twenty participants were enrolled: 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with esophageal lesions indicated for EUS. Participants first underwent USCE and subsequently EUS within 48 hours. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of USCE. Secondary outcomes were safety, visualization of the esophagus, and comfort assessment. RESULTS: The technical success rate of USCE was 95% because 1 patient failed to swallow the capsule. No adverse events were observed. The esophagus was well visualized, and all lesions were detected under USCE optical mode in 19 participants. For healthy volunteers, the US images of normal esophageal walls were all characterized by differentiated 7-layer architecture under both USCE and EUS. For 9 patients, the features of esophageal lesions were recognized clearly under USCE, and presumptive diagnoses derived from USCE were all consistent with those from EUS. Most participants preferred USCE to EUS. CONCLUSIONS: The novel USCE is feasible and safe to observe the esophageal mucosa and acquire submucosal information, which has the potential to be widely used in the clinic. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05054933.).

A novel capsule endoscopy for upper and mid-GI tract: the UMGI capsule.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Complete and consecutive observation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract continues to present challenges for current endoscopy systems. We developed a novel upper and mid gastrointestinal (UMGI) capsule endoscopy using the modified detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (DS-MCE) and inspection method and aimed to assess the clinical application. METHODS: Patients were recruited to undergo UMGI capsule endoscopy followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. All capsule procedures in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract were conducted under the control of magnet and string. The main outcome was technical success, and the secondary outcomes included visualization of the UMGI tract, examination time, diagnostic yield, compliance, and safety evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled and all UMGI capsule procedures realized repeated observation of the esophagus and duodenum with detection rates of 100.0%, 80.0%, and 86.7% of Z-line, duodenal papilla, and reverse side of pylorus, respectively. String detachment was succeeded in 29 patients (96.7%) and the complete examination rate of UMGI tract was 95.45% (21/22). All UMGI capsule procedures were well tolerated with low discomfort score, and had a good diagnostic yield with per-lesion sensitivity of 96.2% in UGI diseases. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This new capsule endoscopy system provides an alternative screening modality for the UMGI tract, and might be indicated in cases of suspected upper and small bowel GI bleeding. Trial registration DS-MCE-UGI and SB, NCT04329468. Registered 27 March 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04329468 .

Small-sized versus standard magnetic capsule endoscopy in adults: a two-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND : Certain patients experience difficulty swallowing a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) device owing to its relatively large size. The newly developed small-sized magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) device is the smallest VCE device ever reported. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the small-sized MCE device in terms of ingestion and examination efficacy. METHODS : Patients in two centers were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the small-sized or standard MCE groups. Differences in capsule ingestion difficulties, visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, and capsule transit times were compared. RESULTS : 96 patients were enrolled (48 in each group). In the small-sized MCE group, the mean (SD) difficulty score and time to swallow the capsule, and success rate for swallowing the capsule at the first attempt were 0.6 (1.0), 3.4 (1.3) seconds, and 89.6 %, which was significant better compared with the standard MCE group with 3.1 (1.7), 12.0 (14.3) seconds and 60.4 %, respectively (all P < 0.001). Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel were comparable between the two groups. The small-sized MCE group had a significantly shorter gastric transit time (49.4 minutes vs. 66.2 minutes; P = 0.04) and longer small-bowel transit time (5.8 hours vs. 5.0 hours; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS : The small-sized MCE device is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal examination, alleviating difficulties in capsule ingestion, improving gastric emptying under magnetic control, and prolonging the small-bowel transit time.

Direct visualization of drug behaviors in the upper GI tract via magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Actual behaviors of drugs in the upper GI tract are not well elucidated. We assess the feasibility of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in direct and real-time visualization of oral drug behaviors in the stomach. METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2019, 9 patients with a recent history of upper GI symptoms and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Participants swallowed magnetically controlled capsules to examine the whole stomach. After baseline examination, participants ingested dyed sucralfate gel, and MCE recorded the adhesion time, retention time, and distribution area of sucralfate gel. Outcomes included behaviors of sucralfate gel, safety, and satisfaction assessment of the procedures. RESULTS: Adhesion time of sucralfate gel in the abdominal symptoms group was significantly shorter than in the healthy control group (23.76 ± 1.37 minutes vs 31.96 ± 3.09 minutes; P = .032), whereas retention time was longer (98.85 ± 13.94 minutes vs 63.93 ± 8.57 minutes; P = .043). The distribution area of sucralfate gel in the abdominal symptoms group was significantly larger than in healthy control group in cardia (24.29 ± 7.39 vs 9.18 ± 4.06; P < .0001), fundus (18.90 ± 7.08 vs 8.49 ± 4.10; P = .0015), and pylorus (4.64 ± 2.72 vs 0.94 ± 0.90; P = .0019). No adverse events were observed. All participants had a high degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is a feasible and noninvasive tool for direct and real-time visualization of drug behaviors (eg, sucralfate gel) in the stomach. (ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT04327869.).