Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-921378

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES@#A study was conducted to investigate the clinical effects of oral digital design on the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth of cleft lip/palate patients.@*METHODS@#Nine adult cleft lip/palate patients who need aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth were recruited. Digital information of patients' dental arches, the surrounding soft tissue and face were captured by digital camera and scanner. The aesthetic analysis and design were conducted using keynote and 3shape software and were demonstrated to the patients. The optimized treatment plan was ensured by communicating with the patients. Digital wax-up models were exported and printed into resin diagnostic models, which were then utilized in the treatment process to guide the doctors and the technicians in tooth preparation and in making the final restorations, respectively. The adhesive procedure was completed after satisfactory try-in. Aesthetics assessment was conducted in accordance with the anterior esthetic evaluation form. The scores of patient's satisfaction were recorded on a questionnaire containing six items of aesthetic index and doctor-patient communication. Patients were interviewed and examined after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, and the clinical effects of restorations were evaluated.@*RESULTS@#All nine patients had satisfactory clinical results. The aesthetic defects of the patients were effectively addressed. All treatments met the requirements of the preoperative digital designs. The patients' scores were all above 90 on the satisfaction scale. At 12 months after the operation, the clinical effects of restorations of all cases achieved A class in each evaluation indicator.@*CONCLUSIONS@#For cleft lip/palate patients with esthetic defect in the anterior teeth, the digital design plays an important role in optimizing the treatment plan and guides the whole treatment process. This design can help clinicians achieve predictable satisfactory aesthetic results.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Esthetics , Tooth
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(9): e19299, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118746

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to examine the epidemiological features of maxillofacial fracture, including the incidence, causes, age and sex distribution, methods of treatment, and prognosis, in a local area.A retrospective study was performed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of 829 patients with maxillofacial fractures treated in a hospital in northern China from August 2011 to July 2019. Sex, age, etiology, fracture site, and treatment method were obtained from the medical records.The average age of all 829 patients was 36.1 years, and most patients were in the 20- to 29-year age group. The male to female ratio was 3.04:1.00. Traffic accidents were the main cause of the maxillofacial fractures. The mandible was the most commonly fractured bone, and the parasymphysis was the most frequently affected site. Head injury was the most common associated injury. Open surgery with internal fixation was the first-choice treatment for most cases.Traffic accidents were the main cause of maxillofacial fractures, followed by falling. Open surgery with internal fixation was the leading treatment choice. Both functional and esthetic outcomes should be considered in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 78(3): 400.e1-400.e6, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31837286

ABSTRACT

Castleman disease is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by the formation of painless hyperplastic lymph nodes. It can affect any lymph nodes of the body but rarely affects the salivary gland. We describe a patient with unicentric Castleman disease presenting as a parotid tumor and discuss the diagnosis and treatment of Castleman disease. A 39-year-old man had a painless lump on the right side of his face for 1 year. A computed tomography scan showed a well-defined, homogeneous mass in the right parotid gland. The patient underwent a right-sided superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve. Histopathologic analysis of the excisional biopsy specimen confirmed the diagnosis of Castleman disease. No further treatment was administered, and the patient recovered well; no recurrence was present at the 1-year follow-up. Castleman disease is a lymphoproliferative disease that rarely affects the parotid gland. Histopathologic examination is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of Castleman disease. The current treatment for patients with unicentric Castleman disease is surgical resection. For patients with multicentric Castleman disease, more complex therapies are required.


Subject(s)
Castleman Disease , Parotid Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Lymph Nodes , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Parotid Gland
4.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-288974

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the effects of mandibular implant junction on the growth of immature bone.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Eight Beagle dogs were randomly divided into three groups: control, unjunction and junction. Twelve implants were produced on the mandible of unjunction experimental group and junction experimental group. At three months after implanting, radiographic examination was performed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Three months after implanting, all implants were integrated with bone. None implants was mobile or got off. Radiographic examination demonstrated that the bone lose difference was no significant in junction and unjunction group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Mandibular implant connection wasn't effect on the growth of bone.</p>


Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Bone Development , Dental Implants , Mandible , Osseointegration , Prostheses and Implants , X-Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...