Application Value of the Diagnosis during Early Carcinoma of Upper Digestive Tract Based on Optical Enhanced Endoscopic Technique.

Objective: The diagnostic value of optical enhanced endoscopy in early cancer of upper digestive tract was studied by comparing the disease accuracy, tumor type, invasion, and various surgical indicators between the two groups. Methods: 188 patients with early upper gastrointestinal cancer treated in our hospital from January 2020 to February 2021 were selected as the research objects. The patients were randomly divided into the observation group and control group with 94 cases in each group. Results: The accuracy of early detection of early carcinoma of upper digestive tract in the observation group was 94.68% and that in the control group was 76.60%. The accuracy of the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). In the observation group, 36 cases of early gastric cancer, 28 cases of early esophageal cancer, and 30 cases of early colorectal cancer were detected; 25 cases of early gastric cancer, 19 cases of early esophageal cancer, and 28 cases of early colorectal cancer were detected; 26 cases of early carcinoma of upper digestive tract infiltration were detected; and 68 cases were not detected, and the detection rate was 27.66%, which was higher than 9.57% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After different methods of treatment, no death occurred in all patients. Except for the operation time, the surgical indexes of the observation group were better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Optical enhanced endoscopic technique had obvious effect in the diagnosis of patients with early cancer of upper digestive tract, it was helpful to improve the clinical detection rate of early carcinoma of upper digestive tract and had certain diagnostic ability for the invasion depth of early cancer of high upper gastrointestinal tract, which was conducive to the detection of clinical invasion lesions and had high clinical promotion and application value.

Value of Magnifying Chromoendoscopy and Magnifying Optical Enhancement Technology in Classifying Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Magnifying chromoendoscopy (ME-CE) through the observation of pit patterns is a productive way to distinguish between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Magnifying optical enhancement technology (ME-OE) is an emerging virtual chromoendoscopy imaging technology and appeared to be a promising approach. However, this information is currently not available. This study is aimed at comparing the differential diagnostic value of ME-CE and OE for neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized (1 : 1) into examination by ME-OE or ME-CE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of two endoscopy methods were compared using ME-OE (were classified according to the JNET classification) and ME-CE (were classified according to the Kudo pit pattern classification), respectively, and the time to predict the histological polyp type was compared. And the agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis by ME-OE or ME-CE were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 365 polyps were found in the 220 patients included (ME-OE: 185; ME-CE: 180.202 had nonneoplastic polyps, 163 had neoplastic polyps). The diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-CE (93% vs. 92%, p > 0.05). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than ME-CE (83 ± 26.4 s vs. 194 ± 17.7 s, p < 0.001). The agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis were at least substantial in both groups. CONCLUSION: ME-OE was superlative to ME-CE in predicting the histology of polyps. OE devoted classification would possibly similarly enhance the endoscopist performance. The trial is registered with ChiCT2000032075.

Comparison of white-light endoscopy, optical-enhanced and acetic-acid magnifying endoscopy for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion of the stomach, which severely affects human life and health. Currently, a variety of endoscopic techniques are used to screen/evaluate GIM. Traditional white-light endoscopy (WLE) and acetic-acid chromoendoscopy combined with magnifying endoscopy (ME-AAC) are the interventions of choice due to their diagnostic efficacy for GIM. Optical-enhanced magnifying endoscopy (ME-OE) is a new virtual chromoendoscopy technique to identify GIM, which combines bandwidth-limited light and image enhancement processing technology to enhance the detection of mucosal and vascular details. We hypothesized that ME-OE is superior to WLE and ME-AAC in the evaluation of GIM. AIM: To directly compare the diagnostic value of WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE for detection of GIM. METHODS: A total of 156 patients were subjected to consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations using WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the three endoscopy methods in the diagnosis of GIM were evaluated. Moreover, the time to diagnosis with ME-AAC and ME-OE was analyzed. Two experts and two non-experts evaluated the GIM images diagnosed using ME-OE, and diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-observer agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: GIM was detected in 68 of 156 patients (43.6%). The accuracy of ME-OE was highest (91.7%), followed by ME-AAC (86.5%), while that of WLE (51.9%) was lowest. Per-site analysis showed that the overall diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-AAC (P = 0.011) and WLE (P < 0.001). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than in ME-AAC (64 ± 7 s vs 151 ± 30 s, P < 0.001). Finally, the inter-observer agreement was strong for both experts (k = 0.862) and non-experts (k = 0.800). The internal consistency was strong for experts (k = 0.713, k = 0.724) and moderate for non-experts (k = 0.667, k = 0.598). CONCLUSION: For endoscopists, especially experienced endoscopists, ME-OE is an efficient, convenient, and time-saving endoscopic technique that should be used for the diagnosis of GIM.