Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 51(5): 827-832, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37128687

ABSTRACT

The sonographic findings in four fetuses presenting with ventriculomegaly at first-trimester ultrasound that were subsequently diagnosed as having agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) are described. The diagnosis of early ventriculomegaly was suspected subjectively by identification of increased cerebrospinal fluid within the lateral ventricles and confirmed by measuring choroid plexus-to-lateral ventricle length and area ratios. Subsequent scans revealed complete ACC in two cases and partial ACC in the other two. This report adds to the increasing evidence suggesting that first-trimester ventriculomegaly is a strong sonographic marker of underlying brain anomalies, including less evident malformations such as ACC. Detailed second-trimester fetal neurosonography in those women continuing their pregnancies should be performed.


Subject(s)
Hydrocephalus , Prenatal Diagnosis , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Corpus Callosum/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Hydrocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Fetus , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Retrospective Studies
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(5): 1071-1078, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains an uncommon cause of non-obstetric abdominal pain during pregnancy, with surgery being the preferred management option. We examined our experience with the surgical management of appendicitis during pregnancy, particularly the risk of foetal loss during the 1st and 2nd trimester and performed a meta-analysis of the available literature. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who had an appendicectomy during pregnancy (January 2010 to December 2019) and a meta-analysis comparing foetal death in open appendicectomy versus laparoscopic appendicectomy during the 1st and 2nd trimester. RESULTS: Seventy pregnant patients were included in our study (57 laparoscopic, 13 open). There were 4 foetal deaths during the study period (7%), all of which occurred after the laparoscopic approach (P-value = 0.578). Open appendicectomies were associated with an increased risk of pre-term delivery (P-value = 0.038). The meta-analysis of 9 studies, which included 311 patients, showed that there was no significant difference between OA and LA in foetal deaths during the 1st and 2nd trimesters (1st trimester foetal deaths: 9/143 laparoscopic versus 4/57 open, M-H risk difference-0.02, 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.10): 2nd trimester foetal deaths: 7/159 laparoscopic versus 2/154 Open, M-H risk difference 0.03, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.09). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest there is no increased risk of foetal loss in pregnant patients undergoing a laparoscopic appendicectomy.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Laparoscopy , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Appendicitis/complications , Female , Fetal Death/etiology , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
3.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 60(6): 919-927, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite being an efficacious means of pain relief, there is a broad range of usage rates of epidural analgesia among countries worldwide. Australia sits between common usage in North America and more conservative usage in the UK. The reason for this is unclear, raising the question of whether there is a difference between Australia and other Western countries in pregnant women's attitudes toward epidural use, or the hospital context. AIM: To explore predictors for epidural analgesia request among pregnant women in Townsville, Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-phase mixed methods exploratory study design, with Phase One involving 12 one-on-one interviews with pregnant and post-partum women regarding attitudes toward labour analgesia decision-making and epidural preferences. Interview data were analysed thematically to develop a survey distributed to 265 third-trimester women in Phase Two. Phase Three involved a chart review of survey participants to record delivery mode, epidural request and indication. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis of Phases Two and Three data were used to develop predictive models for epidural decision-making. RESULTS: Interviews revealed several themes influencing analgesia preferences in Townsville women: concerns regarding personal safety, trust in health professionals, and previous experiences with labour. The logistic regression identified epidural request in labour to be predicted by: primiparity, epidural experience, induction or augmentation of labour, and perceived sense of control associated with epidural use. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the most significant influencers on Townsville women's epidural decision-making were parity, induction or augmentation of labour, previous experience of epidurals and attitude toward epidurals.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Labor Pain/psychology , Patient Preference/psychology , Adult , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesia, Epidural/psychology , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Analgesia, Obstetrical/psychology , Australia , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Labor Pain/drug therapy , Labor, Obstetric , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...