An examination of reliable change methods for measuring cognitive change with the Cogstate Computerized Battery: Research and clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of four reliable change (RC) methods with respect to measuring cognitive change on the Cogstate Computerized Battery (CCB). METHOD: We assessed cognitive change in 57 healthy, urban, well-educated males on the CCB at baseline and 6 months (Median age = 50, 65% university-educated). The study CCB version comprised seven measures covering attention, processing speed, verbal learning, and memory. Raw scores were z-score transformed using age-corrected Cogstate norms (CN) or the sample mean and standard deviation (internal standardization [IS]), and then averaged to create composite z-scores. Composite scores were entered into four RC formulae. RC was defined based on a 90% two-tailed confidence interval. Change scores were compared as continuous (z-scores) and ordinal variables (RC outcomes). RESULTS: CCB composite score reliability (rXY = .78-.79) was replicated in an age- and sex-matched Cogstate database sample of similar size. There was good overall agreement between the four RC methods (Bland-Altman Mdiff = .00; 95% limits of agreement with the mean-CN: z = ± .90; IS: z = ± .93), with each model adhering closely to the 10% rate of RC expected by chance alone (largest χ2 = .86, p = .99). Initial norming strategy (CN or IS) did not affect these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Norming strategy and RC method choice did not significantly impact cognitive change predictions on CCB composite scores. A series of example case data are provided to practically demonstrate the steps involved in applying the longitudinal norms generated in this study. Research in more diverse normative samples is warranted.

A Screening Strategy for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders That Accurately Identifies Patients Requiring Neurological Review.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are not routinely assessed due to the lack of an adequate screening strategy. We aimed to develop a clinically relevant screening procedure for symptomatic HAND, validated against a gold standard neuropsychological (NP) test battery. METHODS: Representative HIV-infected (HIV+) and demographically matched HIV-uninfected (HIV-) participants in an observational study completed a standard evaluation for mood, drug and/or alcohol use, and activities of daily living and a newly designed 20-minute computerized CogState battery that assessed 5 cognitive domains. A subset completed standard NP assessment for 8 cognitive domains. HAND definition on screening and gold standard NP was determined using demographically corrected z scores and the global deficit score (≥ 0.5), applying the Frascati criteria. Participants were blinded to screening results, and the NP examiner was blinded to screening and HIV status. RESULTS: A total of 254 HIV+ participants were enrolled-mean age, 48.9 ± 10.2 years; median nadir CD4, 270 cells/mL; tertiary educated, 54%; and HIV- controls, 72. HIV+ HAND screening prevalence was 30.7% (HIV-associated dementia, 3.2%; mild neurocognitive disorder, 12.6%; and asymptomatic neurocognitive disorder, 15.0%; HIV- group: 13.9%; P = .004). Of the 75 participants who completed the NP battery, the HAND rate in the HIV+ group was 50.9% vs 43.4% by screening (P > .50). HAND screening vs gold standard NP sensitivity was 76% and specificity was 71%. Clinically relevant HIV-associated dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98% (positive predictive value 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic HAND warranting neurological review was accurately predicted using a CogState-based screening procedure.

Effectiveness of a team intervention in reducing modifiable cardiovascular disease risk in HIV-infected subjects on antiretroviral therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing age, higher modifiable and inherent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk of HIV-infected patients [1] necessitates improved approaches to reducing co-morbidities. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a team intervention in reducing modifiable CVD risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIV-infected patients ≥50 years attending a large HIV caseload primary-care practice, who were virologically suppressed on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with moderate or severe 10-year CVD Framingham risk (≥10%) were recruited for this prospective case-control study. Intervention participants were provided a team approach to care, which involved treatment by study doctors for lipid, hypertension and ART management, and monthly review by a team of research nurses and dieticians for smoking cessation, exercise and dietary advice over 12 months. Controls were matched on age and smoking status, and were given standard of care (SOC) by non-study doctors. Outcomes included CVD risk factors, body composition and CVD risk assessment, including Framingham 10-yr risk [2] and D:A:D 5-year estimated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) [3]. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine pre- and post-intervention differences, with p-values used to assess time and main effects of approach to care (Intervention, SOC). RESULTS: A total of 33 patients completed the intervention, with 33 controls (58.0±6.8 and 59.1±6.9 years, respectively). Smoking cessation occurred in 25% cases versus nil controls. There was a significant change in CVD risk between intervention and control groups, in both Framingham scores (time and group×time interaction) and D:A:D scores (group×time interaction only) (Table 1). There was also a significant difference in change in total cholesterol over the study period (time and group×time interaction). Body composition was only measured in intervention patients, with a significant loss in % body fat observed in pre- and post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Team intervention was significantly more effective than standard of care in reducing CVD risk in HIV-infected patients on ART. A team approach to care may be an important component of reducing CVD risk in this population.

The role of hydroxyurea in enhancing the virologic control achieved through structured treatment interruption in primary HIV infection: final results from a randomized clinical trial (Pulse).

BACKGROUND: Structured treatment interruptions (STIs) have been postulated to improve virologic control in primary HIV infection (PHI) by stimulating HIV-specific T-lymphocyte immunity. The addition of hydroxyurea (HU) may reduce viral production from activated CD4 cells. METHODS: Patients with PHI received a standardized antiretroviral (ARV) regimen consisting of indinavir 800 mg twice daily (BID), ritonavir 100 mg BID, didanosine 400 mg (QD), and either stavudine 40 mg BID or lamivudine 150 mg BID, for up to 12 months and were randomized to HU 500 mg BID or not. If viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) was achieved, up to 3 STIs were undertaken. Two ARV cycles were allowed after each interruption if virologic rebound to more than 5000 RNA copies/mL occurred. Treatment success was defined as maintaining viral loads below 5000 copies/mL for 6 months after ARV interruption. RESULTS: Sixty-eight male homosexual patients were randomized: 35 to ARV + HU and 33 to ARV-alone. Median baseline HIV RNA was 5.73 log10 copies/mL, and median CD4 T-lymphocyte count was 517 cells/microL. Treatment success was not significantly different between those receiving and not receiving HU, with 9 (26%) and 9 (27%), respectively, maintaining viral load at less than 5000 copies/mL in each group (P = 0.88). Virologic control was achieved by 11 (19%) of 59 after 1 STI, 1 (2%) of 41 after 2 STIs, and 6 (17%) of 36 after the third STI. Serious adverse events were recorded for 9 (26%) of 35 of patients using HU and 3 (9%) of 33 in the ARV-only group (P = 0.28). CD4 cell increases were significantly blunted for the HU group compared to the ARV-alone group after the initial treatment phase (+101 cells vs. +196 cells, respectively, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyurea was not found to be beneficial when used in association with STIs in patients during PHI.

Early proliferation of CCR5(+) CD38(+++) antigen-specific CD4(+) Th1 effector cells during primary HIV-1 infection.

We investigated whether HIV-1 antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells expressed the viral coreceptor CCR5 during primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). In the peripheral blood of subjects with very early PHI (< 22 days after onset of symptoms), there was a 10- to 20-fold increase in the proportion of highly activated (CD38(+++)) and proliferating (Ki-67(+)) CD4(+) T cells that expressed CCR5(+), and were mostly T-cell intracellular antigen-1 (TIA-1)(+) perforin(+) granzyme B(+). Inthe same patient samples, CD4(+) T cells producing interferon (IFN)-gamma in response to HIV group-specific antigen (Gag) peptides were readily detected (median, 0.58%) by intracellular cytokine assay-these cells were again predominantly CD38(+++), Ki-67(+), and TIA-(++), as well as Bcl-2(low). On average, 20% of the Gag-specific CD4(+) T cells also expressed interleukin-2 (IL-2) and were CD127 (IL-7R)(+). Taken together, these results suggest that Gag-specific T-helper 1 (Th1) effector cells express CCR5 during the primary response and may include precursors of long-term self-renewing memory cells. However, in PHI subjects with later presentation, antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells could not be readily detected (median, 0.08%), coinciding with a 5-fold lower level of the CCR5(+)CD38(+++) CD4(+) T cells. These results suggest that the antiviral response to HIV-1 infection includes highly activated CCR5(+)CD4(+) cytotoxic effector cells, which are susceptible to both apoptosis and cytopathic infection with HIV-1, and rapidly decline.

Greater reversal of CD4+ cell abnormalities and viral load reduction after initiation of antiretroviral therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir before complete HIV type 1 seroconversion.

In a prospective open-label study, 41 male subjects received nelfinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine stratified as either: early stage (ES; negative/indeterminate Western blot; n = 19) or late stage (LS; positive Western blot; n = 22) primary HIV-1 infection. Despite higher median baseline HIV-1 RNA levels and lower CD4(+) cell numbers in the ES subjects, a significantly greater decline in viral load (-3.46 vs. -2.83 log(10) copies/ml; p = 0.023) and increase in CD4(+) cell number (+85 vs. +41 cells/month increase, p = 0.01) were observed over the first 3 months of therapy such that both groups had comparable results at 1 year. The proportion with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at 1 year was similar (9 of 19 ES subjects and 11 of 22 LS subjects by intention-to-treat analysis). Memory CD4(+) cell numbers, and activated CD4(+) percentages, were also significantly improved in ES subjects. Despite poorer prognostic markers at baseline ES subjects achieved responses similar to those of LS subjects after 1 year of treatment.