Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(13)2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001452

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in foundation models have revolutionized model development in digital pathology, reducing dependence on extensive manual annotations required by traditional methods. The ability of foundation models to generalize well with few-shot learning addresses critical barriers in adapting models to diverse medical imaging tasks. This work presents the Granular Box Prompt Segment Anything Model (GB-SAM), an improved version of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) fine-tuned using granular box prompts with limited training data. The GB-SAM aims to reduce the dependency on expert pathologist annotators by enhancing the efficiency of the automated annotation process. Granular box prompts are small box regions derived from ground truth masks, conceived to replace the conventional approach of using a single large box covering the entire H&E-stained image patch. This method allows a localized and detailed analysis of gland morphology, enhancing the segmentation accuracy of individual glands and reducing the ambiguity that larger boxes might introduce in morphologically complex regions. We compared the performance of our GB-SAM model against U-Net trained on different sizes of the CRAG dataset. We evaluated the models across histopathological datasets, including CRAG, GlaS, and Camelyon16. GB-SAM consistently outperformed U-Net, with reduced training data, showing less segmentation performance degradation. Specifically, on the CRAG dataset, GB-SAM achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.885 compared to U-Net's 0.857 when trained on 25% of the data. Additionally, GB-SAM demonstrated segmentation stability on the CRAG testing dataset and superior generalization across unseen datasets, including challenging lymph node segmentation in Camelyon16, which achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.740 versus U-Net's 0.491. Furthermore, compared to SAM-Path and Med-SAM, GB-SAM showed competitive performance. GB-SAM achieved a Dice score of 0.900 on the CRAG dataset, while SAM-Path achieved 0.884. On the GlaS dataset, Med-SAM reported a Dice score of 0.956, whereas GB-SAM achieved 0.885 with significantly less training data. These results highlight GB-SAM's advanced segmentation capabilities and reduced dependency on large datasets, indicating its potential for practical deployment in digital pathology, particularly in settings with limited annotated datasets.

2.
Burns ; 50(1): 115-122, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exposing a healthy wound bed for skin grafting is an important step during burn surgery to ensure graft take and maintain good functional outcomes. Currently, the removal of non-viable tissue in the burn wound bed during excision is determined by expert clinician judgment. Using a porcine model of tangential burn excision, we investigated the effectiveness of an intraoperative multispectral imaging device combined with artificial intelligence to aid clinician judgment for the excision of non-viable tissue. METHODS: Multispectral imaging data was obtained from serial tangential excisions of thermal burn injuries and used to train a deep learning algorithm to identify the presence and location of non-viable tissue in the wound bed. Following algorithm development, we studied the ability of two surgeons to estimate wound bed viability, both unaided and aided by the imaging device. RESULTS: The deep learning algorithm was 87% accurate in identifying the viability of a burn wound bed. When paired with the surgeons, this device significantly improved their abilities to determine the viability of the wound bed by 25% (p = 0.03). Each time a surgeon changed their decision after seeing the AI model output, it was always a change from an incorrect decision to excise more tissue to a correct decision to stop excision. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the feasibility of image-guided burn excision, its effect on surgeon decision making, and suggests further investigation of a real-time imaging system for burn surgery could reduce over-excision of burn wounds.


Subject(s)
Burns , Deep Learning , Animals , Swine , Debridement/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Feasibility Studies , Burns/diagnostic imaging , Burns/surgery , Skin Transplantation
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(1): 279-285, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34314834

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of amputation wound healing is challenging due to the multifactorial nature of critical limb ischemia and lack of objective assessment tools. Up to one-third of amputations require revision to a more proximal level within 1 year. We tested a novel wound imaging system to predict amputation wound healing at initial evaluation. METHODS: Patients planned to undergo amputation due to critical limb ischemia were prospectively enrolled. Clinicians evaluated the patients in traditional fashion, and all clinical decisions for amputation level were determined by the clinician's judgement. Multispectral images of the lower extremity were obtained preoperatively using a novel wound imaging system. Clinicians were blinded to the machine analysis. A standardized wound healing assessment was performed on postoperative day 30 by physical exam to determine whether the amputation site achieved complete healing. If operative revision or higher level of amputation was required, this was undertaken based solely upon the provider's clinical judgement. A machine learning algorithm combining the multispectral imaging data with patient clinical risk factors was trained and tested using cross-validation to measure the wound imaging system's accuracy of predicting amputation wound healing. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients undergoing 25 amputations (10 toe, five transmetatarsal, eight below-knee, and two above-knee amputations) were enrolled. Eleven amputations (44%) were non-healing after 30 days. The machine learning algorithm had 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for prediction of non-healing amputation sites (area under curve, 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that a machine learning algorithm combining multispectral wound imaging with patient clinical risk factors may improve prediction of amputation wound healing and therefore decrease the need for reoperation and incidence of delayed healing. We propose that this, in turn, may offer significant cost savings to the patient and health system in addition to decreasing length of stay for patients.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia/surgery , Hyperspectral Imaging , Machine Learning , Surgical Wound/diagnosis , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Lower Extremity/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Regional Blood Flow , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...