ABSTRACT
Four-year-old children whose mothers had mid-trimester amniocentesis (n = 88) were compared with children whose mothers chose not to have the procedure (n = 46). Intelligence, visual-motor-perceptual skills, language, behaviour, social competence, temperament, physical growth, hearing, and middle-ear function were measured using standardized procedures. Health histories were obtained by maternal report. The results suggest that the wide range of developmental and behavioural variables studied is not influenced by removal of amniotic fluid in the mid-trimester. However, mothers who had amniocentesis were more likely to report a history of ear infections in their child (P = 0.04). In support of this finding were the results of audiological assessment which demonstrated a trend toward a higher rate of bilateral middle-ear impedance abnormalities in children whose mothers had amniocentesis (P = 0.06). Further study of the upper respiratory system is recommended to explore potential long-term sequelae of mid-trimester amniocentesis.
Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Child Behavior , Child Development , Amniocentesis/adverse effects , Body Constitution , Child, Preschool , Cognition , Ear Diseases/etiology , Female , Humans , Infections/etiology , Intelligence , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Prognosis , RiskABSTRACT
Ninety-one infants whose mothers had had amniocentesis, because age increased their risk for a fetal chromosome abnormality, were compared with 53 infants whose mothers chose not to have the test. Mental and motor development and temperament were studied to assess potential influence of amniocentesis on the brain. Physical growth was assessed and the infants were examined for orthopaedic abnormalities and needle injury. The results indicated that amniocentesis does not appear to influence infant mental and motor development, temperament, physical growth or the risk of orthopaedic abnormalities. However, amniocentesis is not entirely free of risk because several of the infants had needle marks. Reassessment of the cohort at age 4 and 7 years and will provide information on the potential longer term consequences of mid-trimester amniocentesis.
Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Child Development , Adult , Amniocentesis/adverse effects , Body Constitution , Female , Humans , Infant , Motor Skills , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Skin Diseases/etiology , TemperamentABSTRACT
The possible effects of midtrimester genetic amniocentesis on neurobehavioral status were studied in newborn infants of women who had had the procedure (N = 100) and in newborn infants of women who had declined the test (N = 56). Brazelton's Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale was administered to newborn infants born at term and did not reveal consequences of amniocentesis on neonatal orientation, range of state, motor ability, autonomic regulation, regulation of state, response decrement, or reflexes. Information on obstetric complications also was obtained. The findings raised questions regarding the temporal relationship between amniocentesis and fetal loss and focused attention on preterm birth as a potential risk that warrants further investigation. This study provides the foundation for our prospective longitudinal follow-up in which the cohort will be reassessed later in infancy and in childhood.
