ABSTRACT
In contrast to the anecdotal claim that "male infants like cars and female infants like dolls," previous studies have reported mixed findings for gender-related toy preferences in infancy. In Experiment 1, we explored the emergence of gender-related preferences using face-car pairs (Experiment 1a, n = 51, 6-20 months) or face-stove pairs (Experiment 1b, n = 54, 6-20 months). In Experiment 2 (n = 42, 14-16 months), we explore the effect of toy properties, infants' past toy exposure, activity levels, and parental attitudes on such preferences using a wider range of toys. For both studies, infants demonstrated a general preference for faced stimuli over other objects, except for male infants who showed no preference between dolls and cars at around 15 months. Infants' prior experience participating in motor-intensive activities, with wheeled toys and parental attitudes appeared to relate to female infants' preferences for dynamic toys. These results indicate a range of factors influence gendered toy preferences and suggest that nurture plays an important role.
Subject(s)
Child Development/physiology , Choice Behavior/physiology , Infant Behavior/physiology , Parenting , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Age Factors , Attitude , Facial Recognition/physiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Play and Playthings , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with M. Crohn or colitis ulcerosa live with a chronic disease. Pharmaceuticals used in convention-al medicine have been proven to be effective but can have strong side-effects. Thus, it is no surprise that affected patients are very interested in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of our survey was to investigate the use and the application of CAM by patients with M. Crohn and colitis ulcerosa in Switzerland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out-patients of the gastroenterological centre at the University Hospital Bern and of two gastroenterological private practices in a medium-sized city completed a self-administered questionnaire on CAM. Demographic variables, disease-related data, use of different approaches of complementary medicine, attitudes towards and the use of CAM were asked for. RESULTS: Out of 204 mailed questionnaires 71% (144) could be evaluated, 44% from patients of the University Hospital, 56% from patients of the gastroenterological private practices. CAM was used by 47% of the patients. The most commonly used methods of CAM were: homeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture. 67% of the patients benefitted by CAM in the long run, whereas 10.5% suffered a relapse of their disease during CAM therapies. The main reason for the patients to apply to CAM was to complement conventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Our survey points out that the studied out-patients have a strong interest in CAM. It is therefore important that clinical research in the various unconventional therapies will be further promoted.
