Interactive binding at cytochrome P-450 of cell growth regulatory bioamines, steroid hormones, antihormones, and drugs.

The virtually universal family of P-450 isozymes contribute to the regulation of cell growth by modulating the levels of steroids and other lipid messengers for cytoplasmic and nuclear processes, including gene expression. In microsomes from rat liver cells, the concentration ( approximately 1 nmole/mg protein) of cytochromes P-450 approximates that of intracellular binding sites (K(d) 1.0-50 microM) for histamine. The potencies of certain therapeutic drugs to inhibit catalytic activity of, and histamine binding to, cytochromes P-450 in vitro were previously shown by us to be predictive of relative propensities to modulate tumor growth in rodents. Also, we demonstrated that growth-regulating polyamines potently interact with histamine at P-450. We now show that several classes of steroid hormones, antiestrogens, and antiandrogens, as well as various arylalkylamine drugs, all potently inhibit (3)H-histamine binding to cytochrome P-450 (K(i) values: testosterone 0.28 microM, progesterone 0.56 microM, flutamide 1.7 microM, tamoxifen 9.0 microM). Furthermore, all the various hormone and drug ligands are mutually inhibitory in their binding to cytochrome P-450; e.g., K(i) values of androstenedione and progesterone, to inhibit imipramine binding to P-450 (determined by spectral analysis), are 11 nM and 26 nM, respectively. The K(i) value of imiprimine to inhibit binding of androstenedione to P-450 is 3.5 microM. We estimate the total P-450 content in microsomes to be greater in male than in female rats and correlated with the number of binding sites for histamine, but not for steroids and drugs that appear to be more selective for P-450 isozymes. Thus, for at least some isozymes, the homeostatic role of the monooxygenases may be governed by histamine, modulated by endogenous ligands, and perturbed by many foreign molecules.

N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy] ethanamine (DPPE) a chemopotentiating and cytoprotective agent in clinical trials: interaction with histamine at cytochrome P450 3A4 and other isozymes that metabolize antineoplastic drugs.

PURPOSE: N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine HCl (DPPE), an intracellular histamine (HA) antagonist with chemopotentiating and cytoprotective properties, is currently in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in breast and prostate cancer. DPPE modulates growth at in vitro concentrations that antagonize HA binding to cytochromes P450 in rat liver microsomes. HA inhibits P450 metabolism of some drugs. Recent in vitro studies in human colon cancer cells have linked DPPE enhancement of paclitaxel, doxorubicin and vinblastine cytotoxicity to inhibition of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) pump. Many substrates of P-gp are also substrates of CYP3A4, a P450 isozyme that metabolizes a variety of antineoplastic agents and is highly expressed in some malignant tissues. Therefore, we assessed whether (a) DPPE and HA interact at CYP3A4 and other P450 human isozymes, and (b) DPPE inhibits the catalytic activity of CYP3A4. METHODS: Using spectral analysis, we measured DPPE and HA binding to insect microsomes that express human P450 isozymes 1A1, 2B6, 2D6 or 3A4. Employing thin-layer chromatography, we assessed the metabolism of DPPE by each isozyme and DPPE inhibition of testosterone metabolism by CYP3A4 and by rat liver microsomes. RESULTS: (1) DPPE evoked "type I" (substrate site binding) absorbance-difference spectra with CYP2D6 (K(S) = 4.1 +/- 0.4 microM), CYP3A4 (K(S) = 31 +/- 15 microM) and CYP1A1 (K(S) = 40 +/- 9 microM), but not with CYP2B6. (2) In correspondence with the binding studies, DPPE was metabolized by CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP1A1; no metabolism occurred with CYP2B6. (3) HA evoked "type II" (heme iron binding) absorbance-difference spectra with all four isozymes, with K(S) values in the range 80-600 microM. DPPE inhibited HA (600 microM) binding to CYP2D6 (IC50 = 4 microM, 95% CI= 1.8-8.9 microM) and CYP1A1 (IC50 = 135 microM: 95% CI = 100-177 microM), but stimulated HA (500 and 1000 microM) binding to CYP3A4 (EC50 = 155 microM, 95% CI = 104-231 microM). DPPE did not affect HA binding to CYP2B6. (4) DPPE inhibited the metabolism of testosterone by CYP3A4. The concentration/effect curve was biphasic: DPPE inhibited metabolism by 30% at the first site (IC50 = 3 microM, 95% CI = 0.5-25.5 microM), and an additional 70% inhibition occurred at the second site (IC50 = 350 microM, 95% CI = 215-570 microM). A similar result was observed with rat liver microsomes. CONCLUSION: DPPE is a substrate for CYP3A4, CYP2D6 and CYP1A1, but not CYP2B6. DPPE inhibits testosterone metabolism by interacting at two sites on CYP3A4, the first correlating with its K(S) value to bind the substrate site and the second, with its EC50 value to enhance HA binding to the heme iron. We postulate that (1) the inhibitory effect of DPPE on CYP3A4 activity is mediated directly at the substrate site and indirectly by its enhancement of the binding of HA to the heme moiety; (2) in tumor cells that express high constitutive levels of CYP3A4, potentiation of chemotherapy cytotoxicity by DPPE results, in part, from inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and P-gp-mediated efflux of antineoplastic drugs; (3) in normal cells that express low constitutive levels of the isozyme, cytoprotection by DPPE results, in part, from induction of CYP3A4 and P-gp, resulting in an increase both in metabolism and efflux of antineoplastic drugs.

Potent interaction of histamine and polyamines at microsomal cytochrome P450, nuclei, and chromatin from rat hepatocytes.

Histamine and polyamines have been implicated in the mediation of cell proliferation. Our previous work linked the growth-modulatory effects of histamine with its binding to intracellular sites in microsomes and nuclei of various tissues. In this study, we identify cytochrome P450 enzymes as a major component of microsomal intracellular sites in hepatocytes and demonstrate that polyamines compete with high affinity for histamine binding to them. Spectral measurement of histamine binding to P450 in liver microsomes resolved high and intermediate affinity binding sites (Ks1 = 2.4 +/- 1.6 microM; Ks2 = 90 +/- 17 microM) that corresponded to microsomal binding sites (Kd1 = 1.0 +/- 0.9 microM; Kd2 = 57 +/- 13 microM) resolved by 3H-histamine binding; additional low affinity (Kd3 approximately 3 mM), and probably physiologically irrelevant, sites were resolved only by 3H-histamine radioligand studies. As determined spectrally, treatment of microsomes with NADPH/carbon monoxide decreased histamine binding to P450 by about 90% and, as determined by 3H-histamine binding, abolished the high affinity sites and reduced by 85% the number of intermediate sites. Spermine competed potently for 3H-histamine binding: in microsomes, Ki = 9.8 +/- 5.8 microM; in nuclei, Ki = 13.7 +/- 3.1 microM; in chromatin, Ki = 46 +/- 33 nM. Polyamines inhibited the P450/histamine absorbance complex with the rank order of potency: spermine > spermidine >> putrescine. In contrast, histamine did not compete for 3H-spermidine binding in nuclei or microsomes, suggesting that polyamines modulate histamine binding allosterically. We propose that certain P450 isozymes that modulate gene function by controlling the level of oxygenated lipids, represent at least one common intracellular target of growth-regulatory endogenous bioamines and, as shown previously, of exogenous growth-modulatory drugs including antiestrogens, antiandrogens, and certain antidepressants and antihistamines.

Salutary clinical response of prostate cancer to antiandrogen withdrawal: assessment of flutamide in an in vitro paradigm predictive of tumor growth enhancement.

Salutary clinical responses to withdrawal of flutamide have been widely reported, indicating the potential of this arylalkylamine antiandrogen to stimulate the growth of prostate cancer. Flutamide is known to inhibit cytochrome P450-mediated testosterone synthesis and metabolism. Our laboratory has shown that arylalkylamine potencies in three in vitro assays of P450 binding or function correspond to a propensity of the drugs to enhance tumor growth in vivo. Accordingly, we measured inhibition by flutamide of (a) histamine binding to cytochrome P450 in rat liver microsomes, as determined spectrally, (b) P450-mediated demethylation of aminopyrine, and (c) DNA synthesis in mouse spleen cells stimulated by concanavalin A, and we compared its potencies in these assays with those of other arylalkylamine pharmaceuticals. Flutamide inhibited histamine binding to P450 (Ki = 31 +/- 7 microM), aminopyrine demethylation (Ki = 39 +/- 2 microM), and mitogenesis (IC50 = 12 +/- 1 microM). In overall potency, it ranked with a group of eight drugs, including the antiestrogen tamoxifen, all linked with enhanced tumor growth. In the context of clinical observations that some patients with prostate cancer benefit from flutamide withdrawal, our findings underline concerns that many arylalkylamine drugs have the potential to stimulate the growth or development of malignancies, including prostate cancer. Tumor growth enhancement by flutamide and other arylalkylamines may result from drug perturbation and/or induction of histamine-binding P450 enzymes involved in the synthesis of steroid and eicosanoid mediators that regulate gene function and cell growth.

Enhanced cancer growth in mice administered daily human-equivalent doses of some H1-antihistamines: predictive in vitro correlates.

BACKGROUND: Present studies of drug-induced tumor growth promotion have evolved from earlier investigations into the mechanism of action of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy[ethanamine.HCl, a tamoxifen derivative which potently inhibits lymphocyte mitogenesis in vitro and stimulates tumor growth in vivo. It is thought that potency to bind to intracellular histamine receptors (HIC), some of which are on cytochromes P450, may correlate with tumor growth-promoting activity. PURPOSE: We assessed the effectiveness of five in vitro assays in predicting in vivo tumor growth stimulation by the H1-antihistamines loratadine, astemizole, cetirizine, hydroxyzine, and doxylamine. METHODS: Potency of each agent was ranked 1-5 in each of the following in vitro assays: 1) inhibition of [3H]histamine binding to microsomal HIC, 2) inhibition of histamine binding to microsomal P450, 3) inhibition of the P450-catalyzed demethylation of aminopyrine, 4) inhibition of lymphocyte mitogenesis, and 5) stimulation of tumor colony formation. An overall rank score was assigned to each drug and correlated with tumor growth stimulation in vivo. Two laboratories conducted in vivo studies in a blinded fashion. Female C57BL and C3H mice were given a subcutaneous injection on day 1 of syngeneic B16F10 melanoma cells (5 x 10(5)) or C-3 fibrosarcoma cells (1 x 10(5)), respectively. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups, then received a single, daily intraperitoneal injection of an estimated human-equivalent dose (or range of doses) of antihistamine or vehicle control for 18-21 days before being killed. Tumors were surgically removed and wet weights compared statistically among groups. RESULTS: The cumulative potency of each drug in affecting tumor growth or growth mechanisms in the five in vitro assays ranked as follows: Loratidine and astemizole ranked highest and were equally potent, followed in decreasing order by hydroxyzine, doxylamine, and cetirizine. A significant correlation (r = .97; P < .02) was observed between the rank order of potency of the antihistamines in all five in vitro assays and the rank order to enhance tumor growth in vivo: Loratidine and astemizole significantly (P < .001) promoted the growth of both melanoma and fibrosarcoma, hydroxyzine significantly (P < .001) promoted the growth of melanoma, while doxylamine and cetirizine did not promote the growth of either tumor. CONCLUSION: Data demonstrate that the in vitro assays predicted the propensity of each H1-antihistamine to stimulate cancer growth in vivo. IMPLICATION: These in vitro tests may prove valuable to screen potential tumor growth promoters.