Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 43(4): 316-320, Oct.-Dec. 2023. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1528934

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Perianal fistula is a common colorectal disease which is caused mainly by cryptoglandular disease. Although most cases are treated successfully by surgery, management of complex perianal fistulas (CPAF) remains a challenge with limited results in recurrence and sometimes associated with fecal incontinence. The CPAF treatment with autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) had become a research hotspot. The technique started to be used in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) fistulas, where the studies showed safe and goods result from the procedure. Cultured ASCs have been used but this approach requires the preceding collection of adipose tissue, time for isolation of ASCs and subsequent in vitro expansion, need for laboratory facilities, and expertise in cell culturing. These factors have been getting over by using the commercially available alternative, allogenic ASCs. Treatment with allogeneic ASCs has shown good results in patients with CD fistulas, however with the disadvantage of being expensive. Objective: To show that the injection with freshly collected adipose tissue is an alternative to treatment with autologous or allogenic ASCs with several advantages. Methods: In this case report, we show our first experience in the treatment of CPAF with the application of collected adipose tissue in a tertiary referral hospital from Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Results The patient had a good postoperative recuperation with a complete fistula healing after 8 months without adverse effects. Conclusion: Injection with freshly collected adipose tissue is a promising and apparently safe sphincter-sparing technique in the treatment of CPAF. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Crohn Disease
2.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 50: e20233562, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851759

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: colonoscopy is the best method for detecting polyps, with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality of 29% and reaching 47% for distal tumors. However, it fails to demonstrate a significant reduction in proximal colon cancer mortality, and is the most common segment with interval neoplasm. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact on detection of polyps of a second sequential evaluation of cecum and ascending colon, with or without the use of indigo carmine chromoendoscopy. METHODS: prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Patients were divided into two groups. The first (G1) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second endoscopy assessment of ascending colon and cecum. The second group (G2) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second assessment of the ascending colon and cecum with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy. RESULTS: In total, 203 patients were analyzed, 101 in the G1 and 102 in the G2. Newer polyps were identified in both groups after the second assessment with a significantly higher number of polyps detected in the patients in the G2 (p=0.0001). The number of patients who had at least one polyp in the two endoscopic assessments was significantly higher in the G2 (53 or 52% vs 27 or 26.7%, p=0.0002). In the second endoscopic assessment, the number of polyps found was also significantly higher in the G2 (50 or 76.9%) compared to the G1 (15 or 23.1%), p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: the second assessment with dye-based chromoendoscopy increases the detection of polyps in the ascending colon and cecum.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonic Polyps , Humans , Colon, Ascending/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Indigo Carmine , Prospective Studies , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/pathology , Colonoscopy , Cecum/pathology
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 256, 2023 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878018

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The complication rate after major abdominal surgery is from 35 to 50%. The multimodal prehabilitation covers all the pre-operative problems to guarantee a faster recovery and reduce the rate of morbidity and mortality after a colorectal procedure. METHODS: Observational study, in patients with CRC who underwent surgical treatment between November 2020 and September 2022. The data of the patients were placed in 2 groups: prehabilitation group (PPH) and no prehabilitation group (NPPH). Demographic data, type of cancer, operative data, and postoperative data were collected. Characteristics between the groups were compared after a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis for the detection of differences. RESULTS: After the PSM analysis, 46 patients were in PPH, and 63 patients were in NPPH. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications (p = 0.192). The median of comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 0 (p = 0.552). Patients in the NPPH had more hospital readmissions (p = 0.273) and more emergency room visits (p = 0.092). Multivariate log binomial regression adjusted for complications showed that pre-habilitation reduces the risk of a pos-operative complication (OR: 0.659, 95%CI, 0.434-1.00, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative complication rate and LOS were similar between patients who receive operative multimodal prehabilitation for CRC surgery and those who did not. Prehabilitation was associated with reduced risk of postoperative complication after multivariate log binomial regression adjusted for complications. Patients who underwent prehabilitation had a slightly lower tendency for postoperative ER visits and hospital readmissions.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Preoperative Exercise , Humans , Propensity Score , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery
4.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 50: e20233435, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531500

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of rectal cancer surgery, in a unit adopting the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME) with a high restorative procedure rate and with a low rate of abdominoperineal excision (APE). METHODS: we enrolles patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer undergoing TME or TME+APE. Patients with mid rectal tumors underwent TME, and patients with tumors of the lower rectum and no criteria for APE underwent TME and intersphincteric resection. Those in which the intersphincteric space was invaded and in those with a free distal margin less than 1cm or a tumor free radial margin were unattainable underwent APE or extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE). We assessed local recurrence rates, overall survival and involvement of the radial margin. RESULTS: sixty (89.6%) patients underwent TME and seven (10.4%) TME + APE, of which five underwent ELAPE. The local recurrence, in pacientes undergoing TME+LAR, was 3.3% and in patients undergoing APE, 14.3%. The local recurrence rate (p=0.286) or the distant recurrence rate (p=1.000) was similar between groups. There was no involvement of radial margins. Survival after 120 months was similar (p=0.239). CONCLUSION: rectal malignancies, including those located in the low rectum, may be surgically treated with a low rate of APE without compromising oncological principles and with a low local recurrence rates.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Hominidae , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Animals , Rectum/surgery , Prospective Studies , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Perineum/surgery , Perineum/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
5.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 50: e20233421, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37075463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) indicates advanced stage cancer, which is generally associated with a poor outcome and a 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an option for treating patients with primary PC, such as mesothelioma, or secondary PC, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) or pseudomixoma. Until recently, such patients were deemed untreatable. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of CRS + HIPEC in patients with PC. Postoperative complications, mortality and survival rates were evaluated according to the diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with PC, undergoing full CRS + HIPEC between October 2004 and January 2020, were enrolled. The mortality rate was 3.8% and the morbidity rate was 61.5%. Complications were significantly higher in proportion to the duration of surgery (p<0.001). The overall survival rates, as shown in the Kaplan-Meyer curve, were respectively 81%, 74% and 53% at 12, 24 and 60 months. Survival rates according to each diagnosis for the same periods were 87%, 82% and 47% in patients with pseudomixoma, and 77%, 72% and 57% in patients with CRC (log-rank 0.371, p=0.543). CONCLUSION: CRS with HIPEC is an option for pacients with primary or secondary PC. Although complication rates are high, a longer survival rate may be attained compared to those seen in previously published results; in some cases, patients may even be cured.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Mesothelioma, Malignant/drug therapy , Survival Rate , Combined Modality Therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis
6.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 50: e20233435, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1449190

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of rectal cancer surgery, in a unit adopting the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME) with a high restorative procedure rate and with a low rate of abdominoperineal excision (APE). Methods: we enrolles patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer undergoing TME or TME+APE. Patients with mid rectal tumors underwent TME, and patients with tumors of the lower rectum and no criteria for APE underwent TME and intersphincteric resection. Those in which the intersphincteric space was invaded and in those with a free distal margin less than 1cm or a tumor free radial margin were unattainable underwent APE or extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE). We assessed local recurrence rates, overall survival and involvement of the radial margin. Results: sixty (89.6%) patients underwent TME and seven (10.4%) TME + APE, of which five underwent ELAPE. The local recurrence, in pacientes undergoing TME+LAR, was 3.3% and in patients undergoing APE, 14.3%. The local recurrence rate (p=0.286) or the distant recurrence rate (p=1.000) was similar between groups. There was no involvement of radial margins. Survival after 120 months was similar (p=0.239). Conclusion: rectal malignancies, including those located in the low rectum, may be surgically treated with a low rate of APE without compromising oncological principles and with a low local recurrence rates.


RESUMO Objetivos: o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os resultados da cirurgia do câncer de reto, em uma unidade que adota os princípios da excisão total do mesorreto (ETM) com baixa taxa de amputação abdominoperineal (AAP). Métodos: os pacientes com câncer retal extraperitoneal foram submetidos a ETM ou ETM com amputação abdominoperianeal. Pacientes com tumores de reto médio foram submetidos a EMT e pacientes com tumores de reto inferior e sem critérios para AAP foram submetidos a EMT e ressecção interesfincteriana. Aqueles em que o espaço interesfincteriano foi invadido e naqueles com margem distal livre menor que 1cm ou margem radial livre de tumor foram inatingíveis foram submetidos a AAP ou excisão abdominoperineal extraelevadora (ELAPE). Avaliamos as taxas de recorrência local, sobrevida global e envolvimento da margem radial. Resultados: sessenta (89,6%) pacientes realizaram ETM e sete (10,4%) ETM + AAP, dos quais cinco realizaram ELAPE. A recidiva local, em pacientes submetidos a ETM com ressecção anterior baixa, foi de 3,3% e em pacientes submetidos a AAP, 14,3%. A taxa de recorrência local (p=0,286) ou a taxa de recorrência à distância (p=1,000) foi semelhante entre os grupos. Não houve envolvimento das margens radiais. A sobrevida após 120 meses foi semelhante (p=0,239). Conclusão: as neoplasias malignas retais, incluindo aquelas localizadas no reto baixo, podem ser tratadas cirurgicamente com baixo índice de AAP, sem comprometer os princípios oncológicos e com baixo índice de recorrência local.

7.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 50: e20233421, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1431275

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) indicates advanced stage cancer, which is generally associated with a poor outcome and a 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an option for treating patients with primary PC, such as mesothelioma, or secondary PC, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) or pseudomixoma. Until recently, such patients were deemed untreatable. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of CRS + HIPEC in patients with PC. Postoperative complications, mortality and survival rates were evaluated according to the diagnosis. Results: Fifty-six patients with PC, undergoing full CRS + HIPEC between October 2004 and January 2020, were enrolled. The mortality rate was 3.8% and the morbidity rate was 61.5%. Complications were significantly higher in proportion to the duration of surgery (p<0.001). The overall survival rates, as shown in the Kaplan-Meyer curve, were respectively 81%, 74% and 53% at 12, 24 and 60 months. Survival rates according to each diagnosis for the same periods were 87%, 82% and 47% in patients with pseudomixoma, and 77%, 72% and 57% in patients with CRC (log-rank 0.371, p=0.543). Conclusion: CRS with HIPEC is an option for pacients with primary or secondary PC. Although complication rates are high, a longer survival rate may be attained compared to those seen in previously published results; in some cases, patients may even be cured.


RESUMO O diagnóstico de carcinomatose peritoneal (CP), indica um estágio avançado do câncer e em geral está associado a um mau prognóstico com sobrevida média variando de 6 a 12 meses. A cirurgia citorredutora (CRS) associada à quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (HIPEC) tem sido descrita como uma opção de tratamento para os pacientes portadores de CP primária como nos portadores de mesotelioma, ou secundária como em portadores de cancer colorretal ou pseudomixoma, até recentemente considerados sem possibilidade terapêutica. Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados do tratamento de pacientes portadores de CP submetidos a CRS + HIPEC. Foram analisadas as taxas complicações pós-operatórias, mortalidade e a sobrevida desses pacientes. Resultados: Foram incluídos 56 pacientes com CP, submetidos a c CRS + HIPEC, no período de Outubro 2004 a Janeiro 2020. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 3,8% e taxa de morbidade de 61,5%, sendo a ocorrência de complicações significativamente maior quanto maior o tempo cirúrgico (p<0,001). A sobrevida global pela curva de Kaplan-Meyer foi de 81%, 74% e 53% em 12, 24 e 60 meses respectivamente. Já a sobrevida por diagnóstico nos mesmos períodos foi de 87%, 82%, 47% para os pacientes portadores de pseudomixoma e de 77%, 72% e 57% para pacientes portadores de câncer colorretal (Log -RANK 0,371, p=0,543). Conclusão: A CRS + HIPEC é uma opção de tratamento para pacientes portadores de CP primária ou secundária. Embora com taxa de complicações elevadas, pode proporcionar aumento da sobrevida quando comparado com resultados prévios da literatura e em alguns casos até a cura.

8.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 50: e20233562, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514767

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: colonoscopy is the best method for detecting polyps, with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality of 29% and reaching 47% for distal tumors. However, it fails to demonstrate a significant reduction in proximal colon cancer mortality, and is the most common segment with interval neoplasm. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact on detection of polyps of a second sequential evaluation of cecum and ascending colon, with or without the use of indigo carmine chromoendoscopy. Methods: prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Patients were divided into two groups. The first (G1) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second endoscopy assessment of ascending colon and cecum. The second group (G2) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second assessment of the ascending colon and cecum with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy. Results: In total, 203 patients were analyzed, 101 in the G1 and 102 in the G2. Newer polyps were identified in both groups after the second assessment with a significantly higher number of polyps detected in the patients in the G2 (p=0.0001). The number of patients who had at least one polyp in the two endoscopic assessments was significantly higher in the G2 (53 or 52% vs 27 or 26.7%, p=0.0002). In the second endoscopic assessment, the number of polyps found was also significantly higher in the G2 (50 or 76.9%) compared to the G1 (15 or 23.1%), p<0.0001. Conclusions: the second assessment with dye-based chromoendoscopy increases the detection of polyps in the ascending colon and cecum.


RESUMO Introdução: a colonoscopia é o melhor método para detecção de pólipos, com redução da mortalidade por câncer colorretal de 29% e chegando até 47% para tumores distais. No entanto, existe falha em demonstrar redução significativa na mortalidade no cólon proximal sendo o segmento mais comum de neoplasia de intervalo. O presente estudo avaliou o impacto na detecção de pólipos em uma segunda avaliação sequencial do ceco e cólon ascendente, com ou sem o uso de cromoendoscopia com Indigo carmim. Métodos: estudo prospectivo, não randomizado. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos. O primeiro (G1) foi submetido à colonoscopia de rotina, seguida de segunda avaliação endoscópica do cólon ascendente e ceco. O segundo grupo (G2) foi submetido à colonoscopia de rotina, seguida de segunda avaliação do cólon ascendente e ceco com cromoendoscopia com índigo carmim. Resultados: no total, foram analisados 203 pacientes, sendo 101 do G1 e 102 do G2. Novos pólipos foram identificados em ambos os grupos após a segunda avaliação com número significativamente maior de pólipos detectados nos pacientes do G2 (p=0,0001). O número de pacientes que apresentaram pelo menos um pólipo nas duas avaliações endoscópicas foi significativamente maior no G2 (53 ou 52% vs 27 ou 26,7%, p=0,0002). Na segunda avaliação endoscópica, o número de pólipos encontrados também foi significativamente maior no G2 (50 ou 76,9%) em relação ao G1 (15 ou 23,1%), p<0,000. Conclusão: a segunda avaliação com cromoendoscopia com índigo carmim aumenta a detecção de pólipos no cólon ascendente e no ceco.

9.
BMC Surg ; 21(1): 229, 2021 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery Surgical Programs were initially applied to colorectal procedures and used as multimodal approach to relieve the response to surgical stress. An important factor that negatively impacts the success of these programs is the poor tolerance of these patients to certain items in the adopted protocol, especially with regard to post-operative measures. The identification of these factors may help to increase the success rate of such programs, ensuring that benefits reach a greater number of patients and that resources are better allocated. Thus, the aims of this study were to assess the results of the implementation of a Simplified Accelerated Recovery Protocol (SARP) and to identify possible factors associated with failure to implement postoperative protocol measures in patients submitted to laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: 161 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The SARP group (n = 84) was submitted to the accelerated recovery program and the CC group (n = 77), to conventional postoperative care. The SARP group was further divided into two subgroups: patients who tolerated the protocol (n = 51) and those who did not (n = 33), in order to analyze factors contributing to protocol nontolerance. RESULTS: The groups had similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The SARP group had a shorter hospital stay, better elimination of flatus, was able to walk and to tolerate a diet sooner (p < 0.0001). Complications rates and readmissions to emergency room were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged operating time, stoma creation and rates of surgical complications were independently associated with poor adherence to SARP (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of our SARP resulted in improved recovery from laparoscopic colorectal surgery and proved to be safe for patients. Extensive surgeries, occurrence of complications, and the need for ostomy were variables associated with poor program adhesion. Trial registration Trial Registry: RBR2b4fyr-Date of registration: 03 October 2017.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Laparoscopy , Humans , Length of Stay , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control
10.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 38(4): 302-308, Oct.-Dec. 2018. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975972

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: Colonoscopy is the screening gold standard to investigate several conditions in the colon. The excellence of preparation is a determining factor for a quality colonoscopy. Objective: Compare the quality of colon preparations for colonoscopy with different kinds of laxative medications in a public hospital of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Method: A prospective double blind randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2016 to March 2017. A total of 117 Patients were randomised in four groups to receive a type of preparation (Sodium picosulfate, Mannitol, Lactitol, Lactulose). The patients answered a questionnaire and peripheral blood samples were collected before and after the preparation.The quality of the cleansing was accessed according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Results: 99.1% of patients have taken the recommended dose and 79.5% reported a good tolerability. Endoscopists performed complete colonoscopy in 89.7%, with an polipectomy rate of 47%. The total effectiveness rate of the solutions were 88%. There were no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.271). Regarding the laboratory parameters, differences were seen in the pre- and post-test values of sodium, chlorine and creatinine but without exceeding reference values. Conclusion: The four preparations were effective for colon cleansing, with good acceptance, differing only as for costs.


RESUMO Introdução: a colonoscopia é o padrão ouro de triagem para pesquisa de várias doenças colônicas. A excelência de preparação é um fator determinante para uma colonoscopia de qualidade. Objetivo: Comparar a qualidade das preparações do cólon para colonoscopia com diferentes tipos de medicamentos laxantes em um hospital público de Belo Horizonte, Brasil. Método: Foi realizado um ensaio clínico randomizado duplo cego prospectivo de junho de 2016 a março de 2017. Um total de 117 pacientes foi randomizado em quatro grupos para receber um tipo de preparação (picossulfato sódico, manitol, lacticol, lactulose). Os pacientes responderam a um questionário e amostras de sangue periférico foram coletadas antes e depois da preparação. A qualidade da limpeza foi acessada de acordo com a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Resultados: 99,1% dos pacientes tomaram a dose recomendada e 79,5% relataram boa tolerabilidade. Os endoscopistas realizaram colonoscopia completa em 89,7%, com taxa de polipectomia de 47%. A taxa de eficácia total das soluções foi de 88%. Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos (p = 0,271). Em relação aos parâmetros laboratoriais, foram observadas diferenças nos valores pré e pós-teste de sódio, cloro e creatinina, mas sem exceder os valores de referência. Conclusão: As quatro preparações foram eficazes para limpeza do cólon, com boa aceitação, diferindo apenas quanto aos custos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Polyethylene Glycols , Colonoscopy , Lactulose , Mannitol , Intestines
11.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 45(1): e1347, 2018.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29451643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to apply the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores as a tool to predict morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery. METHODS: we conducted a prospective cohort study of 551 patients submitted to colorectal surgery in a colorectal surgery tertiary referral hospital in Brazil. We grouped patients into pre-established risk categories for comparison between expected and observed morbidity and mortality rates by the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores. RESULTS: in the POSSUM morbidity analysis, the overall expected morbidity was significantly higher than that observed (39.2% vs. 15.6%). The same occurred with patients grouped in categories II (28.9% x 10.5) and III (64.6% x 24.5%). In category I, the expected and observed morbidities were similar (13.7% x 9.1%). Regarding the evaluation of mortality, it was statistically higher than that observed in category III patients and in the total number of patients (11.3% vs. 5.6%). In categories I and II, we observed the same pattern of category III, but without statistical significance. When evaluating mortality by the P-POSSUM score, the overall expected and observed mortality was similar (5.8% x 5.6%). Of the 31 patients who died, 20.2% underwent emergency procedures and sepsis was the main cause of death. CONCLUSION: the P-POSSUM score was an accurate tool to predict mortality and could be safely used in this population profile, unlike the POSSUM score.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
12.
Belo Horizonte; s.n; 2018. 79 p.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1510621

ABSTRACT

O pós-operatório das operações colorretais tem morbi-mortalidade elevada, trazendo desconforto e, por vezes, sofrimento para os pacientes e familiares. Até recentemente, a maioria das medidas adotadas nos períodos pré, per e pós-operatório, tinham bases empíricas. O desenvolvimento do conceito de recuperação pós-operatória acelerada, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ("ERAS") é baseado na premissa de que, adotar protocolo com medidas cientificamente comprovadas, traz benefícios aos pacientes, permitindo recuperação mais rápida. O sucesso da implantação desses protocolos depende da adesão e da tolerância dos pacientes, sendo que a intolerância ocorre por motivos diversos e multifatoriais. Objetivo: avaliar a taxa de insucesso na implantação de protocolo simplificado de recuperação acelerada em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia colorretal por acesso laparoscópico e os possíveis motivos de não aceitação. Método: Foram avaliados e comparados de forma randomizada,161pacientes divididos em 2 grupos, o G1 (n=84) submetido ao protocolo de recuperação acelerada e o grupo G2 (n=77) que recebeu cuidados pós-operatórios convencionais. Os pacientes do G1 foram subdivididos em 2 subgrupos de pacientes que toleraram (n=51) ou não (n=33) o protocolo ERAS, sendo comparados entre si em relação a possíveis variáveis que pudessem influenciar na aceitação ou não do protocolo. Resultados: Noventa e seis pacientes eram do sexo feminino (59%). A idade variou de 25 a 95 anos, com média de 57,4 ± 12,6 anos. O IMC variou de 18,0 a 51,0 kg/m2 com mediana (Q1;Q3) 25,5kg/m2 (22,8;28,2kg/m2). Os dois grupos foram semelhantes em relação às características sociodemográficas e clínicas. Os pacientes do G1 apresentaram menor período de internação, eliminaram flatos, deambularam e toleraram a dieta mais precocemente (p<0, 0001). A taxa de tolerância ao protocolo de recuperação acelerada foi de 60%. Na análise multivariada dos subgrupos que toleraram ou não o protocolo, observou-se que o tempo cirúrgico prolongado, a confecção de estomia e a ocorrência de complicações foram variáveis que comprometeram a aceitação do mesmo (p<0,0001). Conclusões: O protocolo simplificado de recuperação pós-operatória acelerada é capaz de melhorar a recuperação de pacientes submetidos a operação colorretal laparoscópica, sendo que sua utilização pode não ser tolerada por parcela significativa de pacientes. A adoção de medidas que possam aumentar as taxas de sucesso desses protocolos poderia torná-los mais efetivos, reduzindo as consequências deletérias das alterações fisiológicas decorrentes das cirurgias colorretais.


Colorectal surgeries are associated with increased postoperative morbimortality, causing discomfort and even suffering for patients and relatives. Until recently, the majority of the adopted measures during the pre, per, and postoperative periods were empirical. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program development is based on the premise that adopting a protocol with scientifically proven measures brings benefits to patients, allowing a faster recovery. The success of its implementation depends on patient adherence and tolerance, and intolerance can be related to several and multifactorial reasons. Objective: to assess the insuccess rate of implantation of a simplified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program (SERSP) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the possible reasons for its non-acceptance. Method: 161 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups G1 (n = 84) submitted to the SERSP protocol and G2 group (n = 77) who received conventional postoperative care. Groups were assessed and compared with respect to factors that could affect ERAS tolerance. The G1 patients were subdivided into 2 subgroups of patients who tolerated (n = 51) or not (n = 33) the SERSP protocol, being compared to each other in relation to possible variables that could influence protocol acceptance. Results: There were 96 females (59%) and the mean age was 57.4(± 12.6 years ranging from 25 to 96 years old). The BMI ranged from 18.0 to 51.0 kg / m2 with median (Q1; Q3) 25.5kg / m2 (22.8; 28.2kg / m2). Groups were similar with respect to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Group 1 patients had significantly shorter length of stay, and eliminated flatus, wandered and tolerated the diet earlier (p <0.0001). The rate of tolerance to the accelerated recovery protocol was 60%.In the comparative analysis of the subgroups that accepted or not the SERSP protocol, it was observed that the prolonged surgical time, ostomy preparation and the occurrence of complications were variables that compromised the acceptance of SERSP (p <0.0001). Conclusions: The accelerated postoperative recovery protocol is capable of improving the recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but its use may not be tolerated by a significant number of patients. Adopting measures that can increase the success rates of these protocols could make them more effective.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Postoperative Care , Clinical Protocols , Colectomy , Colorectal Surgery , Medicine , Ostomy , Multivariate Analysis , Diet
13.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 37(4): 285-289, Oct.-Dec. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-894004

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: The objective of the present study was to compare the results of surgical treatment of nonagenarian patients having colorectal cancer with patients younger than 90 years. Methods: A total of 622 patients who underwent curative surgery were included in the present study. The database of the surgical service, in the period from 2007 to 2013, was used to obtain the sample. This is a descriptive, retrospective study that compared the profiles of 17 nonagenarian patients (Group I) with 605 patients younger than 90 years (Group II). The groups were compared regarding surgical complications, length of hospital stay, type of surgery performed and ASA classification. Results: The mean age between the groups was 92.2 years and 61.2 years. The mean length of hospital stay in Groups I and II was 17.3 days and 8.75 days, respectively. The surgery performed most frequently was the right colectomy, in both groups. The most common postoperative complication was sepsis (11.8%) among the nonagenarians, and paralytic ileus (4.5%) among those younger than 90 years. Laparoscopic surgery was performed on 5 out of a total of 17 patients evaluated in Group I. Among the three mortalities registered in this latter group, two were classified as ASA III and only one as ASA I. Conclusion: The results indicate that colorectal surgery may be performed in this group, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates, in patients with low preoperative risk (ASA I/II).


RESUMO Finalidade: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os resultados do tratamento cirúrgico de pacientes nonagenários portadores de câncer colorretal versus pacientes com menos de 90 anos. Métodos: O estudo envolveu 622 pacientes que foram submetidos à cirurgia curativa. Para obtenção da amostra, utilizamos o banco de dados do serviço de cirurgia, abrangendo o período de 2007-2013. Este é um estudo retrospectivo descritivo que comparou os perfis de 17 pacientes nonagenários (Grupo I) versus 605 pacientes com menos de 90 anos (Grupo II). Os grupos foram comparados para complicações cirúrgicas, duração da permanência no hospital, tipo de cirurgia realizada e classificação ASA. Resultados: A média de idade para os Grupos I e II foi, respectivamente, 92,2 e 61,2 anos. A duração média de permanência no hospital nos Grupos I e II foi, respectivamente, 17,3 dias e 8,75 dias. A cirurgia mais frequentemente realizada foi colectomia direita, nos dois grupos. A complicação pós-operatória mais comum foi sepse (11,8%) entre os nonagenários, e íleo paralítico (4.5%) entre os pacientes com menos de 90 anos. Cirurgia laparoscópica foi realizada em 5 pacientes, em um total de 17 pacientes avaliados no Grupo I. Considerando as três mortalidades registradas nesse último grupo, duas foram classificadas como ASA III e apenas uma como ASA I. Conclusão: Os resultados obtidos indicam que, nesse grupo, a cirurgia colorretal é opção válida, com percentuais aceitáveis de morbidade e mortalidade, em pacientes com baixo risco pré-operatório (ASA I/II).


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Morbidity , Mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications
14.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 37(1): 8-12, Jan.-Mar. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-841310

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: Diverticular disease of the colon (DDC) is the fifth most common gastrointestinal disease in developed Western countries, with mortality rates of 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the occurrence of complications, conversion rate, use of stoma, deaths and time of hospitalization among patients undergoing rectosigmoidectomy for DDC and patients undergoing the same surgery for other reasons. Method: This was an observational retrospective comparative study. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Felicio Rocho - Minas Gerais, Brazil - and the data were obtained from the same hospital database. Results: The groups were classified according to age, gender, presence of comorbidities, and ASA classification. There was no evidence indicating a significant difference between groups. In this analysis, no perioperative complications were observed and there was no need for a stoma, and no deaths or fistulas occurred. Conclusion: Elective laparoscopic surgical treatment of DDC in the analyzed group showed no difference in complications, duration of surgery and hospitalization time versus control group. Therefore, the laparoscopic surgical treatment of diverticular disease translates into an excellent tool for both the surgeon and the patient.


RESUMO Introdução: A Doença Diverticular do Cólon (DDC) é a quinta doença gastrointestinal mais frequente nos países desenvolvidos do ocidente com índices de mortalidade de 2,5 por 100.000 habitantes por ano. Objetivo: O objetivo desse estudo é comparar a ocorrência de complicações, taxa de conversão, utilização de estoma, óbito e tempo de internação entre pacientes submetidos a retossigmoidectomia por DDC e pacientes submetidos ao mesmo procedimento cirúrgico por outras causas. Método: Trata-se de um estudo comparativo, retrospectivo observacional. Este estudo foi aprovado pelo comitê de ética do Hospital Felício Rocho - Minas Gerais, Brasil - e os dados foram obtidos no banco de dados do mesmo hospital. Resultados: Os grupos foram classificados em relação à idade, sexo, presença ou não de comorbidades e classificação ASA. Observou-se que não existem evidências indicando diferença significativa entre os grupos. Não houveram complicações per-operatórias, necessidade de estoma, bem como óbitos ou fístulas nesta análise. Conclusão: O tratamento cirúrgico eletivo videolaparoscópico da DDC no grupo analisado não apresentou diferença quanto às complicações, o tempo de cirurgia e o tempo de internação em relação ao grupo controle. Portanto, o tratamento cirúrgico laparoscópico da doença diverticular traduz-se em excelente ferramenta tanto para o cirurgião quanto para o paciente.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Surgical Procedures, Operative
15.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 25(2): e51-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24752156

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed male sexual function using a specific and validated questionnaire, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), in patients subjected to open total mesorectal excision (OTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) and compared it with a control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria consisted of male patients with an active sexual life before surgery subjected to OTME or LTME at the Coloproctological Unit of the Clinics Hospital, Minas Gerais Federal University, between January 2005 and September 2009. The IIEF questionnaire was used. The control group comprised 30 randomly selected men (older than 35 y of age) without previous pelvic or abdominal surgery and without any genitourinary complaints. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and September 2009, 77 male patients were subjected to total mesorectal excision, with 26 meeting the inclusion criteria and answering the questionnaire: 13 in the OTME group and 13 in the LTME group. When the 3 groups were compared in each IIEF domain, there were significant differences in erectile function (P=0.05), orgasm and ejaculation (P=0.009), sexual intercourse satisfaction (P=0.01), and overall satisfaction (P=0.025), favoring the LTME and control groups. No difference was found in sexual desire (P=0.285). CONCLUSIONS: LTME may have the benefit of preserving male sexual function compared with OTME, even in the learning curve period.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Laparoscopy , Learning Curve , Quality of Life , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Sexuality/physiology , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 33(4): 210-215, Nov-Dec/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: although laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal diseases represents a major advance, it is currently performed in less than a third of patients undergoing colectomies. The aim of this study is to analyze the initial results of laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgeries (LACS) performed in a department of Coloproctology in a tertiary hospital, as well as to study the impact of age, gender and body mass index (BMI) and use of ultrasonic scissors or vessel sealing devices in relation to conversion rate. METHODS: this is a prospective observational study with 215 patients who underwent LACS between January 2006 and June 2010 in the Department of Coloproctology at Felicio Rocho Hospital, Belo Horizonte. The data obtained from a specific electronic database included demographics, diagnosis, use of ultrasonic scissors or vessel sealing devices, reason for conversion, duration of hospitalization, lymph node harvest in cancer specimens, complications, and deaths. RESULTS: the laparoscopic-assisted approach corresponded to 36.4% of all colorectal surgeries performed during the study period. Most patients were female (74%), with a mean age of 53.2 years. Ultrasonic scissors or vessel sealing devices were used in 32% of LACS. Specimen extraction and anastomosis were performed through an auxiliary incision in most cases. The overall conversion rate was 12%, with a decrease of 47% after the first year. We did not observe any association between conversion rate and age, gender, BMI, and the use of ultrasonic scissors and vessel sealing devices. The average hospital stay was of 7.7 days and the overall rate of complications was 20%, including 10 anastomotic leaks (4.65%). The rate of postoperative mortality was 1.86%. CONCLUSIONS: despite the difficulties related to the learning curve and unavailability of ultrasonic scissors or vessel sealing devices in most cases, the implementation of LACS in our department can be considered successful in relation to short-term results and conversion rates. (AU)


OBJETIVO: embora o uso da cirurgia laparoscópica no tratamento de doenças colorretais represente um avanço significativo, é realizada atualmente em menos de um terço dos pacientes submetidos à colectomias. O objetivo desse estudo é analisar os resultados iniciais de cirurgias colorretais laparoscópicas vídeo-assistidas (LACS) realizadas no departamento de Coloproctologia de hospital terciário, bem como estudar o impacto da idade, sexo e índice de massa corporal (IMC) e a utilização de tesoura ultrassônica ou dispositivos para selamento hemostático dos vasos em relação à taxa de conversão. MÉTODOS: esse é um estudo observacional prospectivo com 215 pacientes submetidos à LACS entre janeiro de 2006 e junho de 2010 no Departamento de Coloproctologia do Hospital Felício Rocho, em Belo Horizonte. Os dados obtidos a partir de uma base de dados eletrônica específica incluíram dados demográficos, diagnóstico, uso de tesouras ultrassônica ou dispositivos para selamento hemostático dos vasos, taxa de conversão, tempo de hospitalização, linfonodo dissecados na peça cirúrgica, complicações e mortes. RESULTADOS: a abordagem laparoscópica correspondeu a 36,4% de todas as cirurgias colorretais realizadas durante o período de estudo. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino (74%), com idade média de 53,2 anos. A tesoura ultrassônica ou dispositivos para selamento hemostático dos vasos foram utilizados em 32% das LACS. A extração de amostras e a anastomose foram realizadas através de uma incisão auxiliar na maioria dos casos. A taxa de conversão global foi de 12%, com uma diminuição de 47 % após o primeiro ano. Não observamos associação entre a taxa de conversão e idade, sexo, IMC, bem como a utilização de tesouras ultrassônicas e dispositivos para selamento hemostático dos vasos. O tempo médio de internação foi de 7,7 dias, a taxa global de complicações foi de 20%, incluindo 10 fístulas anastomóticas (4,65 %). A taxa de mortalidade pós-operatória foi de 1,86%. CONCLUSÕES: apesar das dificuldades relacionadas com a curva de aprendizado e indisponibilidade da tesoura ultrassônica ou dispositivos para selamento hemostático dos vasos na maioria dos casos, a implementação de LACS em nosso departamento pode ser considerada bem sucedida em relação aos resultados de curto prazo e taxas de conversão. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Treatment Outcome , Colectomy/methods , Conversion to Open Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Body Mass Index , Age Factors , Laparoscopy , Sex Distribution , Length of Stay
17.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 33(3): 131-134, July-Sept/2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-695209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: this study aims to compare the profile of octogenarian individuals with colorectal cancer and those younger than 80 years of age regarding gender distribution, mean age of patients, length of hospital stay, type of surgery performed and postoperative complications. METHODS: this study was carried out at the Coloproctology Department of Hospital Felicio Rocho, Belo Horizonte, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. We evaluated 438 patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery as disease treatment. Data was collected using specific guidelines established by the health care team during a clinical meeting. This is a descriptive and retrospective study that compared the profile of 52 octogenarian patients (Group I) and 386 patients younger than 80 years (Group II). RESULTS: the female gender predominated in group I with 69%, whereas the distribution between genders was similar in group II, with 50.3% of women. Mean age in group I was 84.5 years. The mean hospital stay was 8.25 days for patients younger than 80 years and 9.3 for the octogenarians. Group I had a complication rate of 28.84%, while in Group II it was 22.02%. CONCLUSION: age older than 80 years does not contraindicate colorectal surgery. (AU)


OBJETIVO: este trabalho pretende comparar o perfil de pessoas octagenárias portadoras de CaCR com aquelas com idade inferior a 80 anos, no que diz respeito à distribuição por sexo, idade média dos pacientes, tempo de internação hospitalar, tipo de cirurgia realizada, complicações pós-operatórias. MÉTODOS: este trabalho foi desenvolvido pelo Serviço de Coloproctologia do Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brasil. Foram avaliados 438 pacientes portadores de Câncer Colorretal submetidos a procedimento cirúrgico como medida curativa para a doença. Os dados foram coletados através de protocolo específico criado pela equipe em reunião clínica. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo e retrospectivo que comparou o perfil de 52 pacientes octagenários (Grupo I), com 386 de idade inferior a 80 anos (Grupo II). RESULTADOS: o sexo feminino predomina com 69% no grupo I, já no grupo II a distribuição foi semelhante, com 50, 3% de mulheres. A idade média do grupo I foi de 84,5. O tempo médio de internação foi de 8,25 dias para pacientes mais jovens e de 9,3 para os octagenários. O grupo I apresentou taxa de complicações de 28,84%, enquanto o Grupo II de 22,02%. CONCLUSÃO: idade superior a 80 anos não contraindica cirurgia colorretal. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Aged, 80 and over
18.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 33(2): 50-57, April-June/2013. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-683219

ABSTRACT

After the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and radiochemotherapy, excellent results have been achieved in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. With better oncologic control of the disease, the functional results of this type of therapeutic approach and their impact on the quality of life (QOL) of patients started to be increasingly valued. The aims of this study were to evaluate the QOL of patients with rectal cancer submitted to TME in the late postoperative period and the possible factors that directly influence their quality of life. A total of 72 patients submitted to TME due to extraperitoneal rectal tumor were assessed, after at least one postoperative year, by applying QOL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38), in addition to a specific clinical questionnaire and rectal examination. Patients were evaluated regarding gender, age, indication of radiotherapy and chemotherapy preoperatively, length of postoperative period, distance from the anastomosis to the anal verge and general health status. The mean overall health status of patients was satisfactory (82.06). There was no difference in overall health status between patients with respect to gender, but the male patients had less insomnia (p = 0.002), better future prospects (p = 0.011), fewer effects of chemotherapy (p = 0.020) and better sexual function (p < 0.0001). Patients younger than 50 years had fewer urinary problems (p = 0.035), whereas those older than 65 years reported poorer sexual function (p = 0.012). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had more diarrhea (p = 0.012). Quality of life did not change significantly with time after surgery and the distance from the anastomosis to the anal verge. We conclude that patients undergoing TME have a good quality of life one year after the surgery and that the factors capable of affecting QOL should be identified and improved. (AU)


A introdução da cirurgia de excisão total do mesorreto (ETM) e da radioquimioterapia propiciaram excelentes resultados no tratamento do câncer de reto. Com o melhor controle oncológico da doença, os resultados funcionais deste tipo de abordagem terapêutica e seu impacto na qualidade de vida (QV) dos pacientes passaram a ser cada vez mais valorizados. Os objetivos do presente estudo foram avaliar a QV dos pacientes portadores de câncer retal submetidos à ETM, em pós-operatório tardio e os possíveis fatores capazes de influenciar diretamente na qualidade de vida dos mesmos. Foram avaliados 72 pacientes submetidos à ETM por tumor de reto extraperitoneal, com no mínimo, um ano de pós-operatório, por meio da aplicação de questionários de QV (EORTC QLQ-C30 e EORTC QLQ-CR38), além de questionário clínico específico e exame proctológico. Os pacientes foram avaliados quanto a gênero, idade, realização de radioterapia e quimioterapia pré-operatórias, tempo de pós-operatório, distância da anastomose à margem anal e estado global de saúde. A média do estado global de saúde dos pacientes avaliados foi satisfatória (82,06). Não se observou diferença na saúde global entre os pacientes com relação ao gênero, porém os pacientes do sexo masculino apresentaram menos insônia (p = 0,002), melhores perspectivas futuras (p = 0,011), menos efeitos da quimioterapia (p = 0,020) e melhor função sexual (p < 0,0001). Os pacientes com menos de 50 anos apresentaram menos problemas miccionais (p = 0,035), já os com mais de 65 anos relataram uma pior função sexual (p = 0,012). Os pacientes que realizaram neoadjuvância apresentaram mais diarreia (p = 0,012). A qualidade de vida não se alterou significativamente de acordo com o tempo de pós-operatório e distância da anastomose à margem anal. Conclui-se que os pacientes submetidos à ETM apresentam uma boa qualidade de vida após um ano de cirurgia e que os fatores envolvidos capazes de influenciar a QV devem ser identificados e otimizados. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Postoperative Period , Quality of Life , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 32(2): 106-112, Apr.-June 2012. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-647824

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a condition that may be present in the natural history of colorectal cancer and some other tumors, such as pseudomyxoma peritonei. It has been associated with poor prognosis. The treatment for patients with this condition, up until recently, was systemic chemotherapy or palliative care to relieve the pain and suffering caused by peritoneal dissemination of certain cancers. Promising results, however, have been reported after the implementation of radical cytoreductive surgery followed by peroperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of cytoreductive surgery and peroperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal cancer and pseudomyxoma peritonei. RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated 24 patients from 2004 to 2011. Mean age was 51.31 years, and 54% were female. The primary diagnosis in 50.01% of the cases was pseudomyxoma peritonei, 41.66%, of colon cancer, and 8.33%, of mesothelioma. The overall complication rate was around 83%, two patients (8%) subsequently died between the 8th and 30th postoperative day. There was an association between the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and operative time. The one-year survival rate in the group examined was 60% for colon cancer, and 78.5% for pseudomyxoma. Overall survival was 50% in three years. CONCLUSION: cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC is a treatment option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin and pseudomyxoma. Despite the high rate of peroperative complications (83%), it was possible to achieve a superior survival rate in relation to conventional treatments reported in the literature. (AU)


INTRODUÇÃO: A carcinomatose peritoneal é uma condição que pode estar presente na história natural do câncer colorretal e de algumas outras neoplasias, como o pseudomixoma peritoneal, sendo associada com um prognóstico desfavorável. O tratamento oferecido aos pacientes portadores dessa condição, até recentemente, era a quimioterapia sistêmica ou apenas os cuidados paliativos para aliviar a dor e o sofrimento causados pela disseminação peritoneal de determinadas neoplasias. Resultados promissores, no entanto, têm sido relatados após a implementação da cirurgia citorredutora radical, seguida da quimioterapia hipertérmica intraperitoneal per-operatória. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados da cirurgia citorredutora e da quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica per-operatória (HIPEC) em pacientes portadores da carcinomatose peritoneal, secundária ao câncer colorretal e ao pseudomixoma peritoneal. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados, retrospectivamente, 24 pacientes de 2004 a 2011. A idade média foi de 51,31 anos, 54% eram do sexo feminino. O diagnóstico primário em 50,01% dos casos foi de pseudomixoma peritoneal, 41,66% de câncer de cólon e 8,33% de mesotelioma. A taxa de complicação global girou em torno de 83%, sendo que dois pacientes (8%) evoluíram para o óbito no pós-operatório, entre 8 e 30 dias. Houve associação entre o índice de carcinomatose peritoneal (PCI) e o tempo operatório. A sobrevida em um ano, no grupo analisado, foi de 60% para o câncer de cólon e de 78,5% para o pseudomixoma. A sobrevida global foi de 50% em 3 anos CONCLUSÃO: A cirurgia citorredutora combinada com a HIPEC é uma opção de tratamento para pacientes com carcinomatose peritoneal originária de câncer colorretal e de pseudomixoma. A despeito de uma alta taxa de complicação per-operatória (83%) foi possível alcançar uma sobrevida superior a do tratamento convencional relatado na literatura. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/mortality , Carcinoma/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality
20.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 31(4): 401-404, Oct.-Dec. 2011. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-623495

ABSTRACT

Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is an entity generally caused by the loss of the intervening mesenteric fat pad, resulting in compression of the third portion of the duodenum by the superior mesenteric artery. This article reports the case of a patient with irremovable metastatic adenocarcinoma in the sigmoid colon, that evolved with intense vomiting. Intestinal transit was carried out, which showed important gastric dilation extended until the third portion of the duodenum, compatible with superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Considering the patient's nutritional condition, the medical team opted for the conservative treatment. Four months after the surgery and conservative measures, the patient did not present vomiting after eating, maintaining previous weight. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is uncommon and can have unspecific symptoms. Thus, high suspicion is required for the appropriate clinical adjustment. A barium examination is required to make the diagnosis. The treatment can initially require gastric decompression and hydration, besides reversal of weight loss through adequate nutrition. Surgery should be adopted only in case of clinical treatment failure. (AU)


A síndrome da artéria mesentérica superior é uma entidade clínica causada geralmente pela perda do tecido adiposo mesentérico, resultando na compressão da terceira porção do duodeno pela artéria mesentérica superior. Esse artigo relata o caso clínico de uma paciente portadora de adenocarcinoma de cólon sigmoide metastático irressecável, que evoluiu com vômitos incoercíveis. Realizou-se, então, trânsito intestinal que evidenciou dilatação gástrica importante, que se prolongava até a terceira porção duodenal, quadro radiológico compatível com pinçamento da artéria mesentérica superior. Diante da condição nutricional da paciente, foi optado por iniciar medidas conservadoras (porções alimentares pequenas e mais frequentes, além de decúbito lateral esquerdo após as refeições). Quatro meses após a cirurgia e as medidas conservadoras, a paciente não apresentava mais vômitos pós-prandiais, nem emagrecimento. A síndrome da artéria mesentérica inferior é incomum e os sintomas podem ser inespecíficos. Sendo assim, um índice elevado de suspeita é exigido no ajuste clínico apropriado. O diagnóstico é feito, habitualmente, através de exame radiológico contrastado. O tratamento pode, inicialmente, exigir a descompressão gástrica e a reposição volêmica, além da reversão da perda de peso com nutrição adequada. A cirurgia deve ser reservada para os casos de falha do tratamento clínico. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome/diagnosis , Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome/therapy , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...