Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oper Dent ; 37(6): 634-40, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621166

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different heat-treatment strategies for a ceramic primer on the shear bond strength of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen-phosphate (MDP)-based resin cement to a yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic. Specimens measuring 4.5 × 3.5 × 4.5 mm(3) were produced from Y-TZP presintered cubes and embedded in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Following finishing, the specimens were cleaned using an ultrasound device and distilled water and randomly divided into 10 experimental groups (n=14) according to the heat treatment of the ceramic primer and aging condition. The strategies used for the experimental groups were: GC (control), without primer; G20, primer application at ambient temperature (20°C); G45, primer application + heat treatment at 45°C; G79, primer application + heat treatment at 79°C; and G100, primer application + heat treatment at 100°C. The specimens from the aging groups were submitted to thermal cycling (6000 cycles, 5°C/55°C, 30 seconds per bath) after 24 hours. A cylinder of MDP-based resin cement (2.4 mm in diameter) was constructed on the ceramic surface of the specimens of each experimental group and stored for 24 hours at 37°C. The specimens were submitted to a shear bond strength test (n=14). Thermal gravimetric analysis was performed on the ceramic primer. The data obtained were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=0.05). The experimental group G79 without aging (7.23 ± 2.87 MPa) presented a significantly higher mean than the other experimental groups without aging (GC: 2.81 ± 1.5 MPa; G20: 3.38 ± 2.21 MPa; G100: 3.96 ± 1.57 MPa), showing no difference from G45 only (G45: 6 ± 3.63 MPa). All specimens of the aging groups debonded during thermocycling and were considered to present zero bond strength for the statistical analyses. In conclusion, heat treatment of the metal/zirconia primer improved bond strength under the initial condition but did not promote stable bonding under the aging condition.


Subject(s)
Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Methacrylates/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Yttrium/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Calorimetry, Differential Scanning , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Hot Temperature , Humans , Humidity , Materials Testing , Methyl n-Butyl Ketone/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Thermogravimetry , Time Factors , tert-Butyl Alcohol/chemistry
2.
Gen Dent ; 60(2): e79-85, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22414522

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different primers on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) between a feldspathic ceramic and two composites. Forty blocks (6.0 x 6.0 x 5.0 mm³) were prepared from Vita Mark II . After polishing, they were randomly divided into 10 groups according to the surface treatment: Group 1, hydrofluoric acid 10% (HF) + silane; Group 2, CoJet + silane; Group 3, HF + Metal/Zirconia Primer; Group 4, HF + Clearfil Primer; Group 5, HF + Alloy Primer; Group 6, HF + V-Primer; Group 7, Metal/Zirconia Primer; Group 8, Clearfil Primer; Group 9, Alloy Primer; Group 10, V-Primer. After each surface treatment, an adhesive was applied and one of two composite resins was incrementally built up. The sticks obtained from each block (bonded area: 1.0 mm² ± 0.2 mm) were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 30 days and submitted to thermocycling (7,000 cycles; 5 degrees C/55 degrees C ± 1 degree C). The µTBS test was carried out using a universal testing machine (1.0 mm/min). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and a Tukey test (a = 0.05). The surface treatments significantly affected the results (P < 0.05); no difference was observed between the composites (P > 0.05). The bond strength means (MPa) were as follows: Group 1a = 29.6; Group 1b = 33.7; Group 2a = 28.9; Group 2b = 27.1; Group 3a = 13.8; Group 3b = 14.9; Group 4a = 18.6; Group 4b = 19.4; Group 5a = 15.3; Group 5b = 16.5; Group 6a = 11; Group 6b = 18; Groups 7a to 10b = 0. While the use of primers alone was not sufficient for adequate bond strengths to feldspathic ceramic, HF etching followed by any silane delivered higher bond strength.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis Repair , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Humans , Hydrofluoric Acid/chemistry , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Potassium Compounds/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Silanes/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Tensile Strength , Thiones/chemistry , Time Factors , Triazines/chemistry , Water/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...