ABSTRACT
The intensive care unit (ICU) environment is not propitious for restoring sleep and many studies have reported that critically ill patients have severe sleep disruptions. However, sleep alterations in critically ill patients are specific and differ significantly from those in ambulatory patients. Polysomnographic patterns of normal sleep are frequently lacking in critically ill patients and the neurobiology of sleep is important to consider regarding alternative methods to quantify sleep in the ICU. This article discusses elements of sleep neurobiology affecting the specificity of sleep patterns and sleep alterations in patients admitted to the ICU.
ABSTRACT
The intensive care unit (ICU) environment is not propitious for restoring sleep and many studies have reported that critically ill patients have severe sleep disruptions. However, sleep alterations in critically ill patients are specific and differ significantly from those in ambulatory patients. Polysomnographic patterns of normal sleep are frequently lacking in critically ill patients and the neurobiology of sleep is important to consider regarding alternative methods to quantify sleep in the ICU. This article discusses elements of sleep neurobiology affecting the specificity of sleep patterns and sleep alterations in patients admitted to the ICU.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Sleep/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Humans , Sleep Deprivation/etiology , Sleep Stages/physiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathologySubject(s)
Electroencephalography , Intensive Care Units , Polysomnography , Respiration, Artificial , Sleep Stages , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) is frequently used in clinical research because of its face validity and ease of use but data on its reliability are scarce. Our goal was to estimate the reliability of the scale and compare reliability between face-to-face and video scoring. We analyzed 50 different video interviews recorded during 5 visits of a crossover trial to study the effect of subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Six specialized clinicians rated the CGI using these videos, providing 300 different ratings. The intraclass correlation was lower at inclusion (0.30 [0.13-0.50]) than at later visits (0.68 [0.61-0.80]). Reliability was not influenced by the patients' stimulation status. The mean of at least two independent evaluations of the video is needed to achieve an ICC greater than 0.8. The video CGI is a valid clinical outcome measure suitable for clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00169377).
Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Video Recording/methods , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Twiddler's or twist syndrome is the twisting of pulse generators around themselves. It may result from mechanical manipulation that can induce the malfunction of the device. In this case, twiddler's syndrome resulted from compulsive checking of the device. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) triggered the development of an obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Two invasive procedures were required to replace the ICD. Psychiatric intervention prevented the recurrence of twiddler's syndrome in this patient for more than 2 years. We believe that preimplant psychiatric assessment should be the rule.
