Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care Med ; 32(3): 714-21, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15090952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the possible causative agents of eosinophilic or hypersensitivity myocarditis in patients awaiting heart transplantation. DESIGN: Consecutive patient series. SETTING: Large university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 190 consecutive patients who had heart transplantation at our center. INTERVENTIONS: The myocardium of the explanted heart was examined for a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate containing an identifiable component of eosinophils. The relative quantity of each cell type was evaluated by a semiquantitative grading system (scored 0 to 3). The clinical findings and medications were reviewed, and patients were followed after heart transplantation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) was found in the explanted heart in 14 patients (7.4%). Myocardial infiltration by eosinophils ranged from mild (n = 6), often focal involvement to marked (n = 8), usually multifocal or widespread involvement. Twelve patients (86%) had peripheral blood eosinophilia before transplant, and in ten (71%), the eosinophil count at least doubled. Loop or thiazide diuretics were used in all 14 patients, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were used in 12. Preoperative characteristics were similar in patients with and without EM, except for a higher frequency of inotropic support and assist devices in EM patients. Dobutamine was used in 12 (86%) and dopamine in seven (50%; one with dopamine alone), and one patient (7%) received neither dopamine nor dobutamine. In two patients receiving dobutamine and one receiving dopamine, tapering or discontinuation of the inotropic infusion resulted in a significant diminution of the peripheral eosinophilia and the EM before transplantation. Postoperative survival in patients with and without EM was similar at 8 yrs (50% +/- 13% and 54% +/- 4%, p =.34). No patient in this study has had EM on biopsy after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: EM is a complication of multiple drug therapy in patients awaiting heart transplantation, and should be suspected when peripheral blood eosinophilia is present or the eosinophil count increases by at least two-fold. EM may be related to intravenous inotropic therapy, and this is the first study to document improvement in myocardial pathology after inotropic drug withdrawal. Hypersensitivity to thiazide and loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antibiotics must also be considered. Survival after heart transplantation is not impaired, and postoperative steroid therapy may prevent EM.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/adverse effects , Dobutamine/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Heart Transplantation , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Diuretics/administration & dosage , Diuretics/adverse effects , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Dopamine/administration & dosage , Dopamine/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/pathology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eosinophilia/epidemiology , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/pathology , Female , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Myocarditis/immunology , Myocarditis/pathology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...