Early Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Incidence in Primary Care: Translating Measurements into Actions-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

(1) Background: AF-related strokes will triple by 2060, are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, and alone or in combination, will be one of the main health and economic burdens on the European population. The main goal of this paper is to describe the incidence of new AF associated with stroke, cognitive decline and mortality among people at high risk for AF. (2) Methods: Multicenter, observational, retrospective, community-based studies were conducted from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021. The setting was primary care centers. A total of 40,297 people aged ≥65 years without previous AF or stroke were stratified by AFrisk at 5 years. The main measurements were the overall incidence density/1000 person-years (CI95%) of AF and stroke, prevalence of cognitive decline, and Kaplan-Meier curve. (3) Results: In total, 46.4% women, 77.65 ± 8.46 years old on average showed anAF incidence of 9.9/103/year (CI95% 9.5-10.3), associated with a four-fold higher risk of stroke (CI95% 3.4-4.7), cognitive impairment(OR 1.34 (CI95% 1.1-1.5)), and all-cause mortality (OR 1.14 (CI95% 1.0-1.2)), but there was no significant difference in ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, or peripheral arteriopathy. Unknown AF was diagnosed in 9.4% and of these patients, 21.1% were diagnosed with new stroke. (4) Conclusions: The patients at high AF risk (Q4th) already had an increased cardiovascular risk before they were diagnosed with AF.

The costs associated with stroke care continuum: a systematic review.

Stroke, a leading cause of death and long-term disability, has a considerable social and economic impact. It is imperative to investigate stroke-related costs. The main goal was to conduct a systematic literature review on the described costs associated with stroke care continuum to better understand the evolution of the economic burden and logistic challenges. This research used a systematic review method. We performed a search in PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrial.gov, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar confined to publications from January 2012 to December 2021. Prices were adjusted using consumer price indices of the countries in the studies in the years the costs were incurred to 2021 Euros using the World Bank and purchasing power parity exchange rate in 2020 from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development with the XE Currency Data API. The inclusion criteria were all types of publications, including prospective cost studies, retrospective cost studies, database analyses, mathematical models, surveys, and cost-of-illness (COI) studies. Were excluded studies that (a) were not about stroke, (b) were editorials and commentaries, (c) were irrelevant after screening the title and abstract,(d) grey literature and non-academic studies, (e) reported cost indicators outside the scope of the review, (f) economic evaluations (i.e., cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analyses); and (g) studies not meeting the population inclusion criteria. There may be risk of bias because the effects are dependent on the persons delivering the intervention. The results were synthetized by PRISMA method. A total of 724 potential abstracts were identified of which 25 articles were pulled for further investigation. The articles were classified into the following categories: 1)stroke primary prevention, 2) expenditures related to acute stroke care, 3) expenditures for post-acute strokes, and 4) global average stroke cost. The measured expenditures varied considerably among these studies with a global average cost from €610-€220,822.45. Given the great variability in the costs in different studies, we can conclude that we need to define a common system for assessing the costs of strokes. Possible limitations are related to clinical choices exposed to decision rules that trigger decisions alerts within stroke events in a clinical setting. This flowchart is based on the guidelines for acute ischemic stroke treatment but may not be applicable to all institutions.

Organización y costes de la atención extrahospitalaria del ictus. Revisión sistemática de la literatura / Organization and costs of stroke care in outpatient settings: Systematic review

Objetivo: Revisar la bibliografía sobre costes del ictus (ICD-10 código I63) en el ámbito de la atención primaria. Diseño: Revisión sistemática. Fuentes de datos: PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Reviews, EconLit y Ovid/Embase entre el 1 de enero de 2012 y el 31 de diciembre de 2021 con descriptores incluidos en Medical Subject Heading (MeSH). Selección de estudios: Aquellos con descripción de costes de actividades realizadas en el ámbito extrahospitalario. Se incluyeron revisiones sistemáticas; estudios observacionales prospectivos y retrospectivos; análisis de bases de datos y de costes totales o parciales del ictus como enfermedad (COI). Se agregaron artículos utilizando el método de «bola de nieve». Se excluyeron los estudios: a) no relacionados concretamente con el ictus; b) en formato de editoriales o comentarios; c) irrelevantes después de examinar el título y el resumen; d) literatura gris y estudios no académicos. Extracción de datos: A los estudios se les asignó un nivel de evidencia según los niveles GRADE. Se recogieron datos de costes directos e indirectos. Resultados y conclusiones: Treinta estudios, de los que 14 (46,6%) eran relativos a costes postictus y 12 (40%) a costes en prevención cardiovascular. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría son análisis retrospectivos de diferentes bases de datos de atención hospitalaria a corto plazo, y no permiten realizar un análisis detallado de los costes por diferentes segmentos de servicios. Las posibilidades de mejora aparecen centradas en la prevención primaria y secundaria, selección y traslado prehospitalario, el alta precoz con soporte y la atención sociosanitaria.(AU)

Objective: To review the bibliography on stroke costs (ICD-10 code I63) in the field of primary care. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Reviews, EconLit, and Ovid/Embase between 01/01/2012–12/31/2021 with descriptors included in Medical Subject Heading (MeSH). Selection of studies: Those with a description of the costs of activities carried out in the out-of-hospital setting. Systematic reviews were included; prospective and retrospective observational studies; analysis of databases and total or partial costs of stroke as a disease (COI). Articles were added using the snowball method. The studies were excluded because: a) not specifically related to stroke; b) in editorial or commentary format; c) irrelevant after review of the title and abstract; and d) gray literature and non-academic studies were excluded. Data extraction: They were assigned a level of evidence according to the GRADE levels. Direct and indirect cost data were collected. Results and conclusions: Thirty studies, of which 14 (46.6%) were related to post-stroke costs and 12 (40%) to cardiovascular prevention costs. The results show that most of them are retrospective analyzes of different databases of short-term hospital care, and do not allow a detailed analysis of the costs by different segments of services. The possibilities for improvement are centered on primary and secondary prevention, selection and pre-hospital transfer, early discharge with support, and social and health care.(AU)

[Organization and costs of stroke care in outpatient settings: Systematic review]. / Organización y costes de la atención extrahospitalaria del ictus. Revisión sistemática de la literatura.

OBJECTIVE: To review the bibliography on stroke costs (ICD-10 code I63) in the field of primary care. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Reviews, EconLit, and Ovid/Embase between 01/01/2012-12/31/2021 with descriptors included in Medical Subject Heading (MeSH). SELECTION OF STUDIES: Those with a description of the costs of activities carried out in the out-of-hospital setting. Systematic reviews were included; prospective and retrospective observational studies; analysis of databases and total or partial costs of stroke as a disease (COI). Articles were added using the snowball method. The studies were excluded because: a) not specifically related to stroke; b) in editorial or commentary format; c) irrelevant after review of the title and abstract; and d) gray literature and non-academic studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: They were assigned a level of evidence according to the GRADE levels. Direct and indirect cost data were collected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Thirty studies, of which 14 (46.6%) were related to post-stroke costs and 12 (40%) to cardiovascular prevention costs. The results show that most of them are retrospective analyzes of different databases of short-term hospital care, and do not allow a detailed analysis of the costs by different segments of services. The possibilities for improvement are centered on primary and secondary prevention, selection and pre-hospital transfer, early discharge with support, and social and health care.

Risk of Long-Term Mortality for Complex Chronic Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Population-Based e-Cohort Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Over recent years there has been growing evidence of increased risk of mortality associated with hemorrhagic stroke among older patients. The main objective of this study is to propose and validate a prognostic life table for complex chronic patients after an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) episode in primary care settings. METHODS: This was a multicenter and retrospective study (April 1, 2006-December 31, 2016) of a cohort from the general population presenting an episode of ICH from which a predictive model of mortality was obtained using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the log-rank test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the ability to stratify patients according to vital prognosis. We proceeded to external validation of the model through prospective monitoring (January 1, 2013-December 31, 2017) of the population of complex chronic patients with an episode of ICH. RESULTS: A total of 3594 people aged ≥ 65 years were identified as complex chronic patients (women 55.9%; mean age, 86.1 ± 8.4 years) of whom 161 suffered hemorrhagic stroke during the study period (January 1, 2013-December 31, 2017). The primary outcome was death from any cause within 5 years of follow-up after an ICH episode. The independent prognostic factors of mortality were age > 80 years (HR 1.048, 95% CI 1.021-1.076, p < 0.001) and HAS-BLED score (HR 1.369, 95% CI 1.057-1.774, p = 0.017). Compared to the general population, the incidence density/1000 person per year (15 vs 0.22) was significantly higher with a significantly lower annual lethality rate (17% vs 49.2%); and both the prognostic factors and the risk of stratified mortality showed different epidemiological patterns. The internal validation of the model was optimal (log-rank < 0.0001) in the general population, but its external validation was not significant in the complex chronic patient population (log-rank p = 0.104). CONCLUSIONS: The ICH-AP is a clinical scale that can improve the prognostic prediction of mortality in primary care after an episode of ICH in the general population, but it was not significant in its external validation in a population of complex chronic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03247049.

Long-Term Survival After Stroke According to Reperfusion Therapy, Cardiovascular Therapy and Gender.

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of factors influence stroke prognosis, including age, stroke severity and comorbid conditions; but most current information about outcomes and safety is derived from patients at 3 - 12 months and mostly coming from the hospital activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether treatment strategies have a differential impact on long-survival after acute ischemic stroke among men versus women. METHODS: Acute ischemic stroke patients identified from the population-based register between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 were included, and they were classified into: 1) Acute ischemic stroke + intravenous thrombolysis (group I); 2) Acute ischemic stroke + mechanical thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis (group II); 3) Acute ischemic stroke + medical therapy alone (no reperfusion therapies) (group III). Follow-up went through up until December 2016. The probability of survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the hazard ratio was obtained by using the Cox proportional hazard regression models. Mortality was interpreted as overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 14,368 cases (men 50.1%), 77.1 ± 11.0 years old were included. There was higher survival among those treated with intravenous thrombolysis (P < 0.001); women treated with thrombectomy (P < 0.001); and women < 80 years old without reperfusion therapy. The most common medications were antiplatelets (52.8%), associated with lower survival (P < 0.001); and statins (46.5%), associated with higher survival. The regression model produced the following independent outcome variables associated to mortality: anticoagulant hazard ratio (HR) 1.53 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.44 - 1.63, P < 0.001), diuretics HR 1.71 (95% CI: 1.63 - 1.79, P < 0.001), antiplatelet HR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.42 - 1.56, P < 0.001), statins HR 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.77; P < 0.001), angiotensin II receptor antagonists HR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 - 0.98, P = 0.008) and reperfusion therapy HR 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.97, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Men and women have different prognoses after revascularization treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Under 80 years old the women appear to have a better outcome than men when treated with thrombolysis therapy and/or catheter-based thrombectomy. The chronic cardiovascular pharmacotherapy must be evaluated whether they should be included as factors in the decision to reperfusion.

Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Comorbidities, Survival and Mortality: A Real-Life Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac tachyarrhythmia encountered in clinical practice affecting up to 10% of the population over 60 years old and its prevalence rises with age. The main goals were to characterize the AF patient population after the initial diagnosis of AF and to determine overall survival. METHODS: It is a real-life observational study of 269 subjects with an AF diagnosis over 60 years old randomly selected. The collected variables were: sociodemographic, cardiovascular complications/comorbidities (CVCs) included in the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS_BLED scores, drug assigned as clinical treatment, mean range INR and CVCs and death dates (all-cause mortality). The survival curve and the risk of death were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curve and comparisons with log-rank. RESULTS: The average following time was 6.2 ± 3.7 years (0.2-20.4). Eleven point five percent died. Sixty-five point four percent had some CVCs. There were no differences in the overall incidence of CVCs by gender. The survival probability was 0.86 ± DE 0.03 among men and 0.90 ± DE 0.04 among women without differences. Thirty-six point eight percent (95% CI: 30.8 - 42.7) were diagnosed vascular complications before AF diagnosis, being ischemic cardiopathy (24.2%) and ischemic stroke (23.2%) the most frequent. The mortality is higher (P < 0.036) among those who suffered ≥ 3 vascular complications and significantly lower among those treated with statins (P = 0.032). After AF diagnosis, the most frequent was the cardiac heart failure (46.7%), significantly higher among women (P = 0.037). The mortality is significantly lower in those treated with OAC (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: AF is associated with ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke and congestive heart failure, but the average mortality age is not different from the global population in Spain and Catalonia.

Prevalencia de la fibrilación auricular desconocida y la no tratada con anticoagulantes. Estudio AFABE / Prevalence of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation and of that not being treated with anticoagulant drugs: the AFABE study

Introducción y objetivos. La fibrilación auricular significa un grave problema de salud pública por sus complicaciones, por lo que su manejo debería incluir no sólo su tratamiento, sino también la prevención de las complicaciones tromboembólicas. El objetivo principal es conocer las proporciones de la fibrilación auricular desconocida y la no tratada con anticoagulantes. Métodos. Estudio observacional, transversal, retrospectivo, de base poblacional y multicéntrico. Se seleccionó aleatoriamente a 1.043 sujetos mayores de 60 años para realizarles un electrocardiograma en visita concertada. Se registraron variables sociodemográficas, valores en las escalas CHA2DS2-VASc y HAS-BLED, razón internacional normalizada y motivos de no recibir tratamiento anticoagulante oral. Resultados. La prevalencia total de fibrilación auricular fue del 10,9% (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 9,1-12,8%), de la que el 20,1% era desconocida. De la fibrilación auricular conocida, el 23,5% con un valor de CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2 no recibía tratamiento anticoagulante y el 47,9% tenía un valor HAS-BLED ≥ 3. La odds ratio de no recibir tratamiento anticoagulante fue 2,04 (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,11-3,77) para las mujeres, 1,10 (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,05-1,15) para la mayor edad de diagnóstico y 8,61 (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 2,38-31,0) si el valor de CHA2DS2-VASc es < 2. El deterioro cognitivo (15,2%) fue el motivo principal de no recibir tratamiento anticoagulante. Conclusiones. El 20,1% de las fibrilaciones auriculares de pacientes mayores de 60 años son desconocidas previamente y no se trata con anticoagulantes al 23,5% del total (AU)

Introduction and objectives. Atrial fibrillation constitutes a serious public health problem because it can lead to complications. Thus, the management of this arrhythmia must include not only its treatment, but antithrombotic therapy as well. The main goal is to determine the proportion of cases of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation and the proportion of patients not being treated with oral anticoagulants. Methods. A multicenter, population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study. In all, 1043 participants over 60 years of age were randomly selected to undergo an electrocardiogram in a prearranged appointment. Demographic data, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, international normalized ratio results, and reasons for not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy were recorded. Results. The overall prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 10.9% (95% confidence interval, 9.1%-12.8%), 20.1% of which had not been diagnosed previously. In the group with known atrial fibrillation, 23.5% of those with CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 were not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy, and 47.9% had a HAS-BLED score≥3. The odds ratio for not being treated with oral anticoagulation was 2.04 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.77) for women, 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15) for more advanced age at diagnosis, and 8.61 (95% confidence interval 2.38-31.0) for a CHA2DS2-VASc score<2. Cognitive impairment (15.2%) was the main reason for not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions. The prevalence of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in individuals over 60 years of age is 20.1%, and 23.5% of those who have been diagnosed receive no treatment with oral anticoagulants (AU)

Prevalence of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation and of that not being treated with anticoagulant drugs: the AFABE study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation constitutes a serious public health problem because it can lead to complications. Thus, the management of this arrhythmia must include not only its treatment, but antithrombotic therapy as well. The main goal is to determine the proportion of cases of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation and the proportion of patients not being treated with oral anticoagulants. METHODS: A multicenter, population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study. In all, 1043 participants over 60 years of age were randomly selected to undergo an electrocardiogram in a prearranged appointment. Demographic data, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, international normalized ratio results, and reasons for not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy were recorded. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 10.9% (95% confidence interval, 9.1%-12.8%), 20.1% of which had not been diagnosed previously. In the group with known atrial fibrillation, 23.5% of those with CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 were not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy, and 47.9% had a HAS-BLED score≥3. The odds ratio for not being treated with oral anticoagulation was 2.04 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.77) for women, 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15) for more advanced age at diagnosis, and 8.61 (95% confidence interval 2.38-31.0) for a CHA2DS2-VASc score<2. Cognitive impairment (15.2%) was the main reason for not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in individuals over 60 years of age is 20.1%, and 23.5% of those who have been diagnosed receive no treatment with oral anticoagulants.