Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a relevant issue and considerable differences in safety and efficacy of VIT have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers during VIT, which has already been published. For a second analysis, data concerning premedication and venom preparations in relation to systemic adverse events (AE) during the up-dosing phase and the first year of the maintenance phase were evaluated as well as the outcome of field stings and sting challenges. METHODS: The study was conducted as an open, prospective, observational, multicenter study. In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. RESULTS: Premedication with oral antihistamines was taken by 52.1% of patients during the up-dosing and 19.7% of patients during the maintenance phase. Taking antihistamines had no effect on the frequency of systemic AE (p=0.11) but large local reactions (LLR) were less frequently seen (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; p=0.02). Aqueous preparations were preferentially used for up-dosing (73.0%) and depot preparations for the maintenance phase (64.5%). The type of venom preparation neither had an influence on the frequency of systemic AE nor on the effectiveness of VIT (p=0.26 and p=0.80, respectively), while LLR were less frequently seen when depot preparations were used (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with oral antihistamines during VIT significantly reduces the frequency of LLR but not systemic AE. All venom preparations used were equally effective and did not differ in the frequency of systemic AE.

2.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(1): 40-47, 2021 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peach gibberellin-regulated protein (peamaclein) has recently emerged as a relevant food allergen in cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients. Objective: We investigated monosensitization to peamaclein among Italian cypress pollen-allergic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 835 cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients from 28 Italian allergy centers underwent a thorough work-up to determine food-allergic reactions and performed skin prick testing with a commercial peach extract containing peamaclein. IgE to rPru p 3 was measured in peach reactors, and those with negative results were enrolled as potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. IgE reactivity to rPru p 7 was evaluated using immunoblot and an experimental ImmunoCAP with rPru p 7. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were positive to peach in 163 patients (19.5%); however, 127 (77.9%) were excluded because they reacted to Pru p 3. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) corresponding to 2.8% of the entire study population) were considered potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. No geographic preference was observed. Seventeen of the 24 patients (70.8%) had a history of food allergy, mainly to peach (n=15). Additional offending foods included other Rosaceae, citrus fruits, fig, melon, tree nuts, and kiwi. On peach immunoblot, only 3 of 18 putative peamaclein-allergic patients reacted to a band at about 7 kDa; an additional 4 patients reacted at about 50-60 kDa. Ten of 18 patients (56%) had a positive result for Pru p 7 on ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSION: Allergy and sensitization to peamaclein seem rare in Italy. Most patients react to peach, although other Rosaceae fruits and several citrus fruits may also be offending foods. Peach and cypress pollen probably also share cross-reacting allergens other than peamaclein.


Subject(s)
Cupressus , Food Hypersensitivity , Allergens/adverse effects , Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Gibberellins , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Pollen , Skin Tests/adverse effects
3.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 52(2): 51-61, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994369

ABSTRACT

Summary: Tryptase is a serin-protease produced and released by mast cells after IgE-mediated or non-IgE mediated stimuli. We here review the various aspects related to the molecular characteristics of the enzyme and its biological effects, the genetic basis of its production and the release kinetics. Recommendations for the clinical use of tryptase measurement developed by a task force of Società Italiana di Patologia Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio and Associazione Allergologi Immunologi Italiani Territoriali e Ospedalieri are given on the best procedure for a correct definition of the reference values in relation to the inter-individual variability and to the correct determination of tryptase in blood and other biological liquids, in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis (from drugs, food, insect sting, or idiophatic), death from anaphylaxis (post mortem assessment) and cutaneous or clonal mastcell disorders.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Leukemia, Biphenotypic, Acute/diagnosis , Mastocytoma/diagnosis , Mastocytosis/diagnosis , Tryptases/blood , Advisory Committees , Animals , Autopsy , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Italy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 52(5): 205-209, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31594291

ABSTRACT

Summary: Background and Objective. Sensitization and allergy to shrimp among Italian house dust mite allergic patients are not well defined and were investigated in a large multicenter study. Methods. Shrimp sensitization and allergy were assessed in 526 house dust mite (HDM)-allergic patients submitted to the detection of IgE to Der p 10 and 100 atopic control not sensitized to HDM. Results. Shrimp allergy occurred in 9% of patients (vs 0% of 100 atopic controls not sensitized to HDM; p minor 0.001). Shrimp-allergic patients were less frequently hypersensitive to airborne allergens other than HDM than crustacean-tolerant subjects (35% vs 58.8%; p minor 0.005). Only 51% of tropomyosin-sensitized patients had shrimp allergy, and these showed significantly higher Der p 10 IgE levels than shrimp-tolerant ones (mean 22.2 KU/l vs 6.2 KU/l; p minor 0.05). Altogether 53% of shrimp-allergic patients did not react against tropomyosin. Conclusions. Shrimp allergy seems to occur uniquely in association with hypersensitivity to HDM allergens and tropomyosin is the main shrimp allergen but not a major one, at least in Italy. Along with tropomyosin-specific IgE levels, monosensitization to HDM seems to represent a risk factor for the development of shrimp allergy among HDM allergic patients.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Arthropod Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Tropomyosin/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cross Reactions , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Penaeidae , Prevalence , Pyroglyphidae , Young Adult
5.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183660

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Adult , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Animals , Child , Humans , Hymenoptera/immunology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Italy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life
6.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-184085

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care


La alergia al veneno de himenópteros es una condición subestimada epidemiológicamente que representa una causa importante de morbilidad en todo el mundo. La prevención de reacciones alérgicas futuras en pacientes que han desarrollado una reacción sistémica se basa en el manejo correcto de la emergencia, seguido de un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de autoinyectores de adrenalina y, en el caso de estar indicada, la prescripción de inmunoterapia específica con veneno (VIT). Varios estudios epidemiológicos destacan el escaso conocimiento de esta enfermedad y un frecuente tratamiento insuficiente. Además, enfatizan la importancia de la inmunoterapia específica, un tratamiento que puede salvar la vida del paciente. La disponibilidad de extractos de veneno de himenóptera de alta calidad para uso diagnóstico y terapéutico ha mejorado drásticamente el pronóstico y la calidad de vida de estos enfermos. La VIT subcutánea representa la forma más efectiva de inmunoterapia con alérgeno actualmente disponible, con una eficacia persistente que dura hasta varios años después de su interrupción. Este consenso sobre la evaluación clínica tanto de niños como de adultos alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros ha sido elaborado por un panel de expertos italianos. Su objetivo principal es revisar la evidencia científica disponible en el diagnóstico, la terapia y la evaluación clínica de los pacientes alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros con el propósito de mejorar el conocimiento sobre esta enfermedad y promover buenas prácticas clínicas. Se incluyen sugerencias prácticas para un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de terapia de emergencia e inmunoterapia, así como estrategias para el manejo de los pacientes


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hymenoptera/pathogenicity , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Patient Safety , Treatment Outcome
9.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 49(6): 263-269, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29249134

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Background. The term of α-Gal syndrome, which includes the delayed allergy to red meat and the allergic reactions following the administration of cetuximab, is associated to the presence of specific IgE to α-Gal. In Italy, only anecdotal cases were reported so far. The Association of Italian Allergists (AAITO) carried out a survey with the aim of evaluating presence, characteristics, clinical features, and distribution of the syndrome in Italy. Methods. A web structured questionnaire was made available on the website of AAIITO from July 2016 to January 2017. It included 31 multiple-choice questions concerning different items, including the site of physicians, the number of patients diagnosed as having cetuximab allergy and/or delayed red meat allergy, recall of tick bites, symptoms, time to reactions, elicitor foods, reactions with foods other than meat, and in-vivo and in-vitro tests used for the diagnosis. Results. Seventy-nine physicians completed the questionnaire. Nine cases of allergy to cetuximab and 40 cases of delayed red meat allergy were recorded across Italy. 22.5% of patients with cetuximab allergy and 62.5% of those with delayed red meat allergy recalled a tick bite. 75% of patients with delayed red meat allergy experienced symptoms after eating beef (butcher's cut in 72.5%). Urticaria was the most frequent clinical manifestation (65% of cases). In 60.6% of cases symptoms appeared 2 - 4 hours after meat ingestion, while in 7.9% symptoms appeared after > 4 hours. The most used diagnostic methods were the intradermal test for cetuximab allergy (88.9%) and the detection of IgE to α-Gal (55.5%) for red meat allergy. Most case reports came from Northern Italy. Conclusions. α-Gal syndrome is present in Italy and beef is the most frequent offending food. In most cases symptoms were not severe.


Subject(s)
Cetuximab/adverse effects , Disaccharides/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/immunology , Red Meat/adverse effects , Tick Bites/immunology , Cetuximab/immunology , Cross Reactions , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/epidemiology , Immunologic Tests , Italy/epidemiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Syndrome , Tick Bites/diagnosis , Tick Bites/epidemiology
10.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 49(1): 6-10, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28120599

ABSTRACT

Background. Even though the Parietaria pollen season may be rather long, it is commonly thought that Parietaria pollen is a perennial allergen present along the whole year. Objective. This study aimed at investigating the duration of Parietaria pollen season during a 10-year period in Italy, analysing also the annual pollen quantity and the differences among geographical areas. Methods. Pollen count was assessed daily for 10 years. Globally, ten Italian centers measured Parietaria pollen count. Start date, peak date, end date, duration (days), peak value, and seasonal pollen index were evaluated in each center. Results. Ten-year Parietaria pollen count demonstrates that the pollen season usually lasted for 6-7 months in Italy. There are important differences among centres, mainly attributable to geoclimatic factors. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that Parietaria pollen season lasts about 6-7 months with two peaks (mainly in spring and lower in autumn) in Italy with important geographical variations. This information may have clinical relevance in managing patients allergic to Parietaria.


Subject(s)
Parietaria/immunology , Pollination , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Time Factors
11.
Allergy ; 72(3): 498-506, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27732743

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) constitutes a serious problem for subjects with coronary artery disease. In such subjects, physicians have to choose the more appropriate procedure between challenge and desensitization. As the literature on this issue is sparse, this study aimed to establish in these subjects clinical criteria for eligibility for an ASA challenge and/or desensitization. METHODS: Collection and analysis of data on ASA challenges and desensitizations from 10 allergy centers, as well as consensus among the related physicians and an expert panel. RESULTS: Altogether, 310 subjects were assessed; 217 had histories of urticaria/angioedema, 50 of anaphylaxis, 26 of nonimmediate cutaneous eruptions, and 17 of bronchospasm related to ASA/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) intake. Specifically, 119 subjects had index reactions to ASA doses lower than 300 mg. Of the 310 subjects, 138 had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 101 of whom underwent desensitizations, whereas 172 suffered from a chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD), 126 of whom underwent challenges. Overall, 163 subjects underwent challenges and 147 subjects underwent desensitizations; 86 of the latter had index reactions to ASA doses of 300 mg or less. Ten subjects reacted to challenges, seven at doses up to 500 mg, three at a cumulative dose of 110 mg. The desensitization failure rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable CIHD and histories of nonsevere hypersensitivity reactions to ASA/NSAIDs, an ASA challenge is advisable. Patients with an ACS and histories of hypersensitivity reactions to ASA, especially following doses lower than 100 mg, should directly undergo desensitization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic , Drug Hypersensitivity/complications , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Aged , Algorithms , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Clinical Decision-Making , Comorbidity , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnosis , Myocardial Ischemia/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
12.
Case Rep Hematol ; 2015: 737302, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25755899

ABSTRACT

Mast cell leukemia (MCL) is a very rare form of systemic mastocytosis (SM) with a short median survival of 6 months. We describe a case of a 65-year-old woman with aleukaemic variant of MCL with a very high serum total tryptase level of 2255 µg/L at diagnosis, which occurred following an episode of hypotensive shock. She fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of SM, with a bone marrow smear infiltration of 50-60% of atypical mast cells (MCs). She tested negative for the KIT D816V mutation, without any sign of organ damage (no B- or C-findings) and only few mediator-related symptoms. She was treated with antihistamine alone and then with imatinib for the appearance of anemia. She maintained stable tryptase level and a very indolent clinical course for twenty-two months; then, she suddenly progressed to acute MCL with a serum tryptase level up to 12960 µg/L. The patient died due to haemorrhagic diathesis twenty-four months after diagnosis. This clinical case maybe represents an example of the chronic form of mast cell leukemia, described as unpredictable disease, in which the serum total tryptase level has confirmed itself as a reliable marker of mast cells burden regardless of the presence of other signs or symptoms.

13.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 46(6): 226-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398166

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA), formerly named Churg Strauss Syndrome, is a multisystem disorder characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma, and prominent peripheral blood eosinophilia; it is classified as a vasculitis of the small and medium sized arteries, although the vasculitis is often not clinically apparent in the initial phases of the disease. We present the case of a woman with EGPA who was frequently treated with high dose steroid therapy during hospital admission for refractory asthma. After December 2008, the date when we started Omalizumab, we observed a significative reduction of circulating eosinophils and IgE serum level, and the patient was no more hospitalized for respiratory failure or asthma attacks.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Middle Aged , Omalizumab
14.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 46(6): 237-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398170

ABSTRACT

An educational program, consisting in a clear explanation of the technical aspects and use of the adrenaline auto-injection devices (AAD) and in a practical test utilizing a demonstration kit was given to 350 patients from our outpatient clinic. AAD was also distributed to 50 patients formerly followed by another allergy clinic without training. At practical control test, only 10% of the untrained patients where able to correctly use the AAD versus 80% of trained subjects. Since AAD is a life-saving procedure in severe anaphylactic episodes, this attempt to improve the ability of the patient to comply with the procedure can improve the efficacy of the treatment and eventually the patient's health.


Subject(s)
Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Patient Education as Topic , Self Administration/instrumentation , Humans , Injections/instrumentation
15.
Minerva Pediatr ; 66(4): 257-60, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25198560

ABSTRACT

AIM: The prevalence of systemic reactions (SR) to Hymenoptera stings in children was estimated in values lower than 1% in early studies but much higher in recent surveys. We evaluated the current prevalence and the incidence of SR and large local reactions (LLR) to Hymenoptera stings in children in Italy. METHODS: The data on children were collected from the database of the population study on the city of Cotignola, analyzing the answers to the part of the questionnaire about Hymenoptera stings, that concerned if the subject was ever stung by apids or vespids, if there has been a SR or a LLR, and if subjects with reactions received a diagnostic evaluation and a medical treatment. RESULTS: Of the population of 1035 children, 173 (16.7%) were stung at least one time by Hymenoptera. Of them, 5 had had a SR and 9 had had a LLR. This defines a prevalence of SR of 0.5% and of LLR of 0.9%. Only one reaction was severe. Of the 14 subjects with SR or LLR, 5 (35.7%) underwent a diagnostic evaluation and one (7.1%) was treated with venom immunotherapy. The incidence of SR in the subsequent 2 years was 0.09% in the first year and 0.08% in the second year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not confirm the recent reports of an increased prevalence of Hymenoptera venom allergy in children. The incidence of SR to stings, thus far unreported for children, was very low both in the first and in the second year.


Subject(s)
Hymenoptera , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Insect Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Insect Bites and Stings/etiology , Adolescent , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 46(1): 22-5, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sesame seed allergy, a potentially very severe food allergy, seems on the rise worldwide but is still uncommon in Italy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the allergenic profile of Italian sesame seed-allergic patients. METHODS: Patients with genuine sesame seed allergy diagnosed over one year in a large number of allergy centers scattered through Italy were considered for the study. Their IgE reactivity to sesame seed allergens was characterized by immunoblot analysis. RESULTS: Eleven sesame seed allergic patients were detected and studied. 10/10 patients showed IgE reactivity against a sesame allergen at about 20 kDa, and 7/10 showed an extremely strong reactivity at about 32 kDa. The same 7 sera reacted also against a 28 kDa allergen, although such reactivity was significantly weaker in 6/7 cases. Eight patients showed IgE reactivity at about 48 kDa, and 5 sera reacted against higher m.w. proteins at about 67 kDa. Two sera showed IgE reactivity at about 43 kDa as well. Only one serum appeared to react to 2S-albumin. CONCLUSIONS: Italian sesame seed-allergic patients react mostly against allergens other than those described so far as major ones. A large number of recombinant sesame allergens will be needed for a comprehensive component- resolved diagnosis of allergy to this food.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Galectin 3/immunology , Sesamum/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Weight , Seeds/immunology
19.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 44(4): 175-7, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092007

ABSTRACT

A 39-years-old man afferred to our hospital for a fever lasting for more than 6 months, without abnormalities at physical examination (in particular no skin alterations); a recent laboratory and instrumental investigation was ineffective and so a fever of unknown origin (FUO) was diagnosed Since he reported an history of infantile mastocytosis (usually auto-resolving) we evaluated his serum-tryptase levels that resulted of 49 ug/L (normal value 20 ug/L), raising the doubt of the presence of an active mastocytosis. The following bone marrow evaluation showed aggregates of CD117 positive cells and a c-Kit point mutation at codon D 816V confirming the diagnosis of indolent mastocytosis.The present case confirm that FUO can be caused by an otherwise asymptomatic indolent mastocytosis, thus suggesting to include the serum-tryptase level measurement in the diagnostic approach to this pathological condition, at least in selected cases.


Subject(s)
Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Mastocytosis/complications , Adult , Humans , Male , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/analysis , Tryptases/blood
20.
Allergy ; 67(9): 1186-9, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most cases of beer allergy reported so far have been associated with hypersensitivity to the non-specific lipid transfer protein (LTP). In view of the marked differences in brewing processes we assessed IgE reactivity as well as tolerance to many different beers in an allergic patient. METHODS: A 45 year-old man hypersensitive to grass pollen, cat dander and Alternaria tenuis with a history of urticaria and dyspnoea after drinking beer and a weak skin reactivity to commercial corn extract was studied. The patient underwent SPT with 36 different brands of beer and an open challenge with those scoring negative was performed. An immunoblot analysis was carried out using 2 SPT-positive beers, 2 SPT-negative beers, and barley, wheat, and maize extracts using both patient's serum and a maize LTP-specific in-house developed polyclonal antibody from rabbit. Further, the immune reactive LTP of one beer was separated by HPLC and the chromatogram was compared to that of purified maize LTP. RESULTS: Beer SPT scored positive in 30/36 cases. The immunoblot analysis showed IgE reactivity at about 10 kDa against the two SPT-positive beers and against maize with both patient's serum and the polyclonal anti-LTP rabbit serum, whereas the two SPT-negative beers, and barley extract scored negative. The immunodetected protein co-migrated with maize LTP. CONCLUSION: In beer-allergic patients the diagnostic workup may point to the detection of some tolerated products that can be consumed risk-free.


Subject(s)
Beer/adverse effects , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Animals , Beer/classification , Cats , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Humans , Immunoblotting , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Rabbits , Zea mays/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...