ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prognosis assessment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is multifactorial and placement of patients on the lung transplantation (LT) waiting list requires the weighing of a complex set of criteria. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze a series of patients treated in our unit at the moment of their inclusion on the LT waiting list and long-term survival after LT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Baseline characteristics, LT outcomes, and survival were evaluated in all patients diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) who were included on the LT waiting list in 2011-2016. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were listed with a diagnosis of PAH or PVOD. Patients had an average age of 43 ± 12 years and 71% were female. The median time between PAH diagnosis and inclusion on the LT waiting list was 62.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-93.3 months). Twenty-eight patients (84%) underwent double LT. The difference between the waiting time in urgent cases (1.5 months; IQR, 0.4-4.2 months) and in elective cases (7.4 months; IQR, 2.7-16.2 months) was significant (P < .049). The 28 patients with PAH/PVOD in our hospital had a 95% short-term survival after LT both at 1 and at 3 months, without variance between urgent and elective LT. Longer-term survival rate was 84% both at 12 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: There is great complexity in determining the appropriate time for transplantation referral and inclusion on the waiting list for patients with PAH/PVOD so that LT can be more realistically incorporated into the treatment algorithm for PAH. LT offers a good short- and long-term survival in patients with PAH/PVOD.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Adult , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/mortality , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease/mortality , Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
We analysed the impact of the Xpert(®) MTB/RIF molecular test on health-care diagnostic delay among tuberculosis patients. Diagnostic delay was 17.2 days (standard deviation 23.2, median 10 days). Of 128 patients recruited into the study, 60 (47%) were smear-negative; of these, 40 (67%) were Xpert-positive and were started on treatment without culture. The sensitivity of smear microscopy was 53% compared with 82% for Xpert. In smear-negative patients, delay in Xpert-positive and -negative patients was respectively 15.5 ± 13.2 and 25.5 ± 12.5 days (P = 0.002). We conclude that Xpert results were significantly associated with shorter health-care diagnostic delay, particularly in smear-negative patients.
