Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias / Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases

En los últimos años la llamada «medicina personalizada o de precisión» ha irrumpido con fuerza en el manejo de las enfermedades, entre ellas las respiratorias. La posibilidad de implantar esta forma de trabajar pasa indefectiblemente por el hallazgo y validación de biomarcadores biológicos que se relacionen bien con el diagnóstico, tratamiento o pronóstico de los pacientes respiratorios. En este sentido, la mayoría de enfermedades respiratorias o grupo de las mismas ya cuentan con biomarcadores biológicos de mayor o menor fiabilidad, y se están realizando un gran número de estudios en busca de nuevos de estos indicadores. El objetivo de la presente revisión es poner al día al lector y analizar la literatura científica existente sobre la existencia y validez diagnóstica, terapéutica o pronóstica de los biomarcadores biológicos más importantes en la actualidad en las principales enfermedades respiratorias, así como sobre los retos futuros en este sentido. (AU)

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area. (AU)

[Translated article] Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases / Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area. (AU)

En los últimos años la llamada «medicina personalizada o de precisión» ha irrumpido con fuerza en el manejo de las enfermedades, entre ellas las respiratorias. La posibilidad de implantar esta forma de trabajar pasa indefectiblemente por el hallazgo y validación de biomarcadores biológicos que se relacionen bien con el diagnóstico, tratamiento o pronóstico de los pacientes respiratorios. En este sentido, la mayoría de enfermedades respiratorias o grupo de las mismas ya cuentan con biomarcadores biológicos de mayor o menor fiabilidad, y se están realizando un gran número de estudios en busca de nuevos de estos indicadores. El objetivo de la presente revisión es poner al día al lector y analizar la literatura científica existente sobre la existencia y validez diagnóstica, terapéutica o pronóstica de los biomarcadores biológicos más importantes en la actualidad en las principales enfermedades respiratorias, así como sobre los retos futuros en este sentido. (AU)

Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases. / Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias.

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area.

Portopulmonary hypertension: prognosis and management in the current treatment era - results from the REHAP registry.

BACKGROUND: Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a rare condition with poorer survival compared to idiopathic/familial pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH/FPAH). AIMS: To compare the characteristics, survival, prognostic factors and management of PoPH and IPAH/FPAH patients and to assess the impact of treatment on survival of PoPH patients. METHODS: Analysis of data of prevalent and incident PoPH patients enrolled in the Spanish registry of PAH (REHAP) from January 1998 to December 2017 and comparison with IPAH/FPAH patients. Variables analysed: patient and disease (PAH and liver) characteristics, first-line PAH-targeted therapy, causes of death, prognostic factors and survival (according to aetiology and treatment in PoPH patients). RESULTS: Compared to IPAH/FPAH patients (n = 678), patients with PoPH (n = 237) were predominantly men, older and had better functional class and higher prevalence of ascites. Haemodynamics were better. Biomarkers for heart failure were worse. Age- and sex-adjusted 5-year survival rate from diagnosis was 49.3% for PoPH patients and 68.7% for IPAH patients (P < 0.001). Treated PoPH had better survival than non-treated. PAH- and liver-related causes accounted for 30.2% and 24.7% of deaths in PoPH patients. PoPH patients were less likely to receive first-line PAH-targeted therapy and this was associated with greater mortality. Increasing age, worse exercise capacity and ascites were independent prognostic factors of poorer survival; first-line oral monotherapy was associated with improved survival. Eight (3.4%) PoPH patients underwent liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: PoPH patients are undertreated and show poorer survival than IPAH/FPAH patients. First-line treatment with PAH-targeted therapy was associated with better survival. Presence of ascites was a predictor of mortality.

Physical activity levels are low in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) leads to exercise capacity impairment, but limited data are available on the objective evaluation of physical activity (PA) levels in these patients. METHODS: We assessed PA levels using triaxial accelerometry in Spanish PH patients (n=75, 48±14 years, 65% female) and gender/age matched controls (n=107), and examined potential associations of meeting minimum international recommendations [moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) ≥150 min/week] with survival predictors. RESULTS: With the exception of vigorous PA (with very low values in both groups), all accelerometry data showed significant differences between patients and controls, with lower PA levels and proportion of individuals meeting minimum PA guidelines, but higher inactivity time, in the former. Notably, the odds ratio (OR) of having a "low-risk" value of 6-minute walking distance (≥464 m) or ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (≤39) was higher in patients following MVPA guidelines than in their less active peers [OR =4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-11.6, P=0.005, and OR =4.5, 95% CI, 0.9-21.1, P=0.054]. CONCLUSIONS: Daily PA is reduced in patients with PH, often to a level that may decrease their odds of survival. Efforts should be made to promote the implementation of healthy PA habits in this patient population.

Effects of an 8-month exercise intervention on physical capacity, NT-proBNP, physical activity levels and quality of life data in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by NYHA class.

This article provides descriptive detailed (pre and post) values of physical capacity variables, NT-proBNP, physical activity levels and quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) (both, intervention and control group) by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class before and after an 8-month exercise intervention. The data are supplemental to our original Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) entitled "Benefits of skeletal-muscle exercise training in pulmonary arterial hypertension: The WHOLEi+12 trial" (L. González-Saiz, C. Fiuza-Luces, F. Sanchis-Gomar, A. Santos-Lozano, C.A. Quezada-Loaiza, A. Flox-Camacho, D. Munguía-Izquierdo, I. Ara, A. Santalla, M. Morán, P. Sanz-Ayan, P. Escribano-Subías, A. Lucia A, 2017) [1].

Benefits of skeletal-muscle exercise training in pulmonary arterial hypertension: The WHOLEi+12 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is often associated with skeletal-muscle weakness. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the effects of an 8-week intervention combining muscle resistance, aerobic and inspiratory pressure-load exercises on upper/lower-body muscle power and other functional variables in patients with this disease. METHODS: Participants were allocated to a control (standard care) or intervention (exercise) group (n=20 each, 45±12 and 46±11years, 60% women and 10% patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension per group). The intervention included five, three and six supervised (inhospital) sessions/week of aerobic, resistance and inspiratory muscle training, respectively. The primary endpoint was peak muscle power during bench/leg press; secondary outcomes included N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, 6-min walking distance, five-repetition sit-to-stand test, maximal inspiratory pressure, cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables (e.g., peak oxygen uptake), health-related quality of life, physical activity levels, and safety. RESULTS: Adherence to training sessions averaged 94±0.5% (aerobic), 98±0.3% (resistance) and 91±1% (inspiratory training). Analysis of variance showed a significant interaction (group×time) effect for leg/bench press (P<0.001/P=0.002), with both tests showing an improvement in the exercise group (P<0.001) but not in controls (P>0.1). We found a significant interaction effect (P<0.001) for five-repetition sit-to-stand test, maximal inspiratory pressure and peak oxygen uptake (P<0.001), indicating a training-induced improvement. No major adverse event was noted due to exercise. CONCLUSIONS: An 8-week exercise intervention including aerobic, resistance and specific inspiratory muscle training is safe for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and yields significant improvements in muscle power and other functional variables.

Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Whole Muscle Exercise Training Effects in Outpatients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (WHOLEi+12).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Physical exercise is an important component in the management of pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH). The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to determine the effects of an 8-week intervention combining muscle resistance, aerobic and inspiratory pressure load exercises in PAH outpatients. METHODS: The RCT will be conducted from September 2015 to September 2016 following the recommendations of the Consolidated Standards of Reported Trials (CONSORT), with a total sample size of n ≥ 48 (≥24 participants/group). We will determine the effects of the intervention on: (i) skeletal-muscle power and mass (primary end points); and (ii) NT-proBNP, cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables (VO2peak, ventilatory equivalent for CO2 at the anaerobic threshold (VE/VCO2 at the AT), end-tidal pressure of CO2 at the anaerobic threshold (PETCO2 at the AT), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), objectively-assessed spontaneous levels of physical activity, and safety (secondary end points). CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: This trial will provide insight into biological mechanisms of the disease and indicate the potential benefits of exercise in PAH outpatients, particularly on muscle power.