[Dose intensity received in breast cancer treatment with chemotherapy]. / Intensidad de dosis recibida en el tratamiento quimioterápico del cáncer de mama.

OBJECTIVE: To know relative dose intensity (RDI) in patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. To determine the number of patients where RDI was < 85% of that programmed and the possible cause. METHOD: Retrospective study, four-month selection period. The following were recorded: age, body surface, protocol applied, intention of treatment, frequency of administration of cycles, number of cytostatic treatments previously received and filgrastim administration. The average RDI per patient and protocol was calculated. RESULTS: 110 patients were analysed, the average age of them being 55.4 years (interval: 31-84), average body surface 1.7 m2 (1.3-2.4). Overall average RDI was 91.0% (SD 10.7). 93.8% (10.6), 95.8% (6.3) and 81.9% (18.5) in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative treatments, respectively. 20% of the patients did not reach a RDI = 85% of that programmed, average RDI 69.5% (3.29). A delay in the administration of chemotherapy equal or greater than seven days occurred in 45.4% of the cases, average RDI 80.7% (16.0). In the episodes where the dose was reduced because of toxicity, the RDI was 75.6% (13.6). Significant inverse ratios were obtained with age (p = 0.02) and line of treatment (p = 0.03) with the RDI. In 36.8%, dose reduction was caused by neutropenia; 52.9% received filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients received the appropriate RDI. Age, previous treatments and intention of treatment were the variables with the greatest impact on the dose received. The delay in administering the cycle was the most frequent act minimising the toxicity and which least affected the treatment.

Intensidad de dosis recibida en el tratamiento quimioterápico del cáncer de mama / No disponible

Objetivo: Conocer las intensidades de dosis relativas (IDR) enpacientes con cáncer de mama y tratamiento quimioterápico.Determinar el número de pacientes donde la IDR fue < 85% de laprogramada y posible causa.Método: Estudio retrospectivo, periodo de selección de 4 meses.Se registraron: edad, superficie corporal, protocolo administrado,intención de tratamiento, frecuencia de administración de ciclos,número de tratamientos citostáticos recibidos anteriormente y administraciónde filgrastim. Se calculó la IDR media por paciente y protocolo.Resultados: Se analizaron 110 pacientes, edad media 55,4años (intervalo: 31-84), superficie corporal media 1,7 m2 (1,3-2,4). La IDR media global fue 91,0% (DE 10,7). Del 93,8%(10,6), 95,8% (6,3) y 81,9% (18,5) en neoadyuvancia, adyuvanciay tratamiento paliativo, respectivamente. El 20% de pacientesno alcanzó una IDR >= 85% de la programada, IDR media 69,5%(3,29). Un retraso en la administración de quimioterapia igual osuperior a 7 días ocurrió en un 45,4% de los casos, IDR media80,7% (16,0). En los episodios donde se disminuyó la dosis portoxicidad la IDR media fue 75,6% (13,6). Se obtuvieron relacionesinversas significativas de la edad (p = 0,02) y línea de tratamiento(p = 0,03) con la IDR. En un 36,8% la reducción de dosisfue por neutropenia, recibiendo filgrastim el 52,9%.Conclusiones: La mayoría de pacientes recibió una IDR adecuada.La edad, tratamientos anteriores e intención de tratamientofueron las variables que más afectaron a la dosis recibida. Elretraso en la administración del ciclo fue la actuación más frecuentepara minimizar la toxicidad y que menos afectó al tratamiento

Objective: To know relative dose intensity (RDI) in patientswith breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. To determine thenumber of patients where RDI was < 85% of that programmedand the possible cause.Method: Retrospective study, four-month selection period.The following were recorded: age, body surface, protocol applied,intention of treatment, frequency of administration of cycles,number of cytostatic treatments previously received and filgrastimadministration. The average RDI per patient and protocol was calculated.Results: 110 patients were analysed, the average age of thembeing 55.4 years (interval: 31-84), average body surface 1.7 m2(1.3-2.4). Overall average RDI was 91.0% (SD 10.7). 93.8%(10.6), 95.8% (6.3) and 81.9% (18.5) in neoadjuvant, adjuvantand palliative treatments, respectively. 20% of the patients did notreach a RDI >= 85% of that programmed, average RDI 69.5%(3.29). A delay in the administration of chemotherapy equal orgreater than seven days occurred in 45.4% of the cases, averageRDI 80.7% (16.0). In the episodes where the dose was reducedbecause of toxicity, the RDI was 75.6% (13.6). Significant inverseratios were obtained with age (p = 0.02) and line of treatment(p = 0.03) with the RDI. In 36.8%, dose reduction was caused byneutropenia; 52.9% received filgrastim.Conclusions: Most patients received the appropriate RDI.Age, previous treatments and intention of treatment were thevariables with the greatest impact on the dose received. The delayin administering the cycle was the most frequent act minimisingthe toxicity and which least affected the treatment