Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Toxicol ; 42(9): 1424-1442, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991177

ABSTRACT

Ingestion of ethanol during pregnancy is known to have detrimental effects on the fetus. Although the potential developmental effects of maternal ethanol intake during lactation are less well characterized, public health guidelines recommend avoidance of alcohol or, if alcohol is consumed, to allow for 1-2 h to pass before nursing. A proposal to classify ethanol as potentially harmful to breast-fed children warrants an investigation of the potential adverse neurodevelopmental effects of low-dose ethanol exposure during lactation. There currently are no studies that have examined neurodevelopmental outcomes from lactational exposure to ethanol from the use of topical products that contain ethanol, such as alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS). Furthermore, the epidemiological literature of lactational ethanol exposures from maternal alcohol consumption is limited in design, provides equivocal evidence of neurological effects in infants, and is insufficient to characterize a dose-response relationship for developmental effects. Toxicological studies that observed neurodevelopmental effects in pups from ethanol via lactation did so at exceedingly high doses that also caused maternal toxicity. In this investigation, blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) of breastfeeding women following typical-to-intense ABHS use were computationally predicted and compared to health benchmarks to quantify the risk for developmental outcomes. Margins of 2.2 to 1000 exist between BECs associated with ABHS use compared to BECs associated with neurotoxicity adverse effect levels in the toxicology literature or oral ethanol intake per public health guidelines. Neurodevelopmental effects are not likely to occur in infants due to ABHS use by breastfeeding women, even when ABHSs are used at intense frequencies.


Subject(s)
Hand Sanitizers , Alcohol Drinking , Child , Ethanol/toxicity , Female , Hand Sanitizers/pharmacology , Humans , Infant , Lactation , Pregnancy
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 80: 116-24, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27316554

ABSTRACT

A quantitative human risk assessment of chloroxylenol was conducted for liquid hand and dishwashing soap products used by consumers and health-care workers. The toxicological data for chloroxylenol indicate lack of genotoxicity, no evidence of carcinogenicity, and minimal systemic toxicity. No observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) were established from chronic toxicity studies, specifically a carcinogenicity study that found no cancer excess (18 mg/kg-day) and studies of developmental and reproductive toxicity (100 mg/kg-day). Exposure to chloroxylenol for adults and children was estimated for two types of rinse-off cleaning products, one liquid hand soap, and two dishwashing products. The identified NOAELs were used together with exposure estimates to derive margin of exposure (MOE) estimates for chloroxylenol (i.e., estimates of exposure over NOAELs). These estimates were designed with conservative assumptions and likely overestimate exposure and risk (i.e., highest frequency, 100% dermal penetration). The resulting MOEs ranged from 178 to over 100, 000, 000 indicating negligibly small potential for harm related to consumer or health-care worker exposure to chloroxylenol in liquid soaps used in dish washing and hand washing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Consumer Product Safety , Hand Disinfection/methods , Health Personnel , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Soaps/adverse effects , Xylenes/adverse effects , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/analysis , Data Mining , Databases, Factual , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Rats , Risk Assessment , Soaps/analysis , Toxicity Tests/methods , Xylenes/analysis
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 73(1): 248-64, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212636

ABSTRACT

Ethanol-based topical antiseptic hand rubs, commonly referred to as alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS), are routinely used as the standard of care to reduce the presence of viable bacteria on the skin and are an important element of infection control procedures in the healthcare industry. There are no reported indications of safety concerns associated with the use of these products in the workplace. However, the prevalence of such alcohol-based products in healthcare facilities and safety questions raised by the U.S. FDA led us to assess the potential for developmental toxicity under relevant product-use scenarios. Estimates from a physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach suggest that occupational use of alcohol-based topical antiseptics in the healthcare industry can generate low, detectable concentrations of ethanol in blood. This unintended systemic dose probably reflects contributions from both dermal absorption and inhalation of volatilized product. The resulting internal dose is low, even under hypothetical, worst case intensive use assumptions. A significant margin of exposure (MOE) exists compared to demonstrated effect levels for developmental toxicity under worst case use scenarios, and the MOE is even more significant for typical anticipated occupational use patterns. The estimated internal doses of ethanol from topical application of alcohol-based hand sanitizers are also in the range of those associated with consumption of non-alcoholic beverages (i.e., non-alcoholic beer, flavored water, and orange juice), which are considered safe for consumers. Additionally, the estimated internal doses associated with expected exposure scenarios are below or in the range of the expected internal doses associated with the current occupational exposure limit for ethanol set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. These results support the conclusion that there is no significant risk of developmental or reproductive toxicity from repeated occupational exposures and high frequency use of ABHSs or surgical scrubs. Overall, the data support the conclusion that alcohol-based hand sanitizer products are safe for their intended use in hand hygiene as a critical infection prevention strategy in healthcare settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Ethanol/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Administration, Inhalation , Administration, Topical , Animals , Haplorhini , Health Personnel , Humans , Rats , Risk Assessment , Safety , Skin Absorption/physiology
4.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 26(9): 1809-17, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17705650

ABSTRACT

The toxicity and uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by earthworms were measured in soil samples collected from manufactured-gas plant sites having a wide range in PAH concentrations (170-42,000 mg/kg) and soil characteristics. Samples varied from vegetated soils to pure lampblack soot and had total organic carbon contents ranging from 3 to 87%. The biota-soil accumulation factors (BSAFs) observed for individual PAHs in field-collected earthworms (Aporrectodea caliginosa) were up to 50-fold lower than the BSAFs predicted using equilibrium-partitioning theory. Acute toxicity to the earthworm Eisenia fetida was unrelated to total PAH concentration: Mortality was not observed in some soils having high concentrations of total PAHs (>42,000 mg/kg), whereas 100% mortality was observed in other soils having much lower concentrations of total PAHs (1,520 mg/kg). Instead, toxicity appeared to be related to the rapidly released fraction of PAHs determined by mild supercritical CO2 extraction (SFE). The results demonstrate that soils having approximately 16,000 mg rapidly released total PAH/kg organic carbon can be acutely toxic to earthworms and that the concentration of PAHs in soil that is rapidly released by SFE can estimate toxicity to soil invertebrates.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/isolation & purification , Industry , Oligochaeta/drug effects , Oligochaeta/metabolism , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/metabolism , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/toxicity , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Animals , Carbon Dioxide/chemistry , Gases
5.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 22(11): 2599-604, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14587898

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to determine the effect of nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) on the bioavailability of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) in soil. Sentry 19 oil and pristane reduced the availability of BaP for assimilation by the earthworm Eisenia fetida and for mutagenicity in a rifampicin-sensitive strain of Pseudomonas putida. As much as 80% of the compound could be rendered unavailable to the worms or for genotoxicity. Tests with five alkanes and an oil showed that the extent of reduction in genotoxicity of BaP varied with the identity, viscosity, and hydrophobicity of the NAPL. The magnitude of the decline in availability for genotoxicity differed in tests of three soils. Because little or no BaP was lost from the soil, the diminished bioavailability was not the result of a diminished total concentration of the compound. These findings show that exposure to hydrophobic toxicants can be appreciably altered in soils containing NAPLs.


Subject(s)
Benzo(a)pyrene/pharmacokinetics , Benzo(a)pyrene/toxicity , Oligochaeta , Soil Pollutants/pharmacokinetics , Soil Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Biological Assay , Biological Availability , Mutagenicity Tests , Pseudomonas putida/genetics , Water Pollutants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...