Antilipolytic effects of alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, neuropeptide Y, adenosine, and PGE1 in mammal adipocytes.

Lipolysis is stimulated by different hormones, depending on the species, but is also regulated by antilipolytic modulators, such as catecholamines (alpha 2-agonists), neuropeptide Y (NPY), adenosine, and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), for which species-specific variations are poorly described. Comparison of the efficiency of these antilipolytic systems showed that PGE1 or phenylisopropyladenosine was able to totally inhibit lipolysis activation in nine mammalian species. However, the antilipolytic responses to clonidine or UK-14304 were fully developed in hamster and rabbit but blunted in the adipocytes of jerboa, rat, guinea pig, garden dormouse, and dormouse. A powerful antilipolytic effect of NPY was found only in the garden dormouse. Only human and dog adipocytes exhibited antilipolytic responses to alpha 2-adrenergic and NPY stimulation. These observations were explained by differences in alpha 2-adrenergic and NPY/peptide YY receptor number. Thus, inhibitory regulation of lipolysis in white adipocytes seems to be composed of two systems: a constitutive one that is related to paracrine mediators (adenosine, prostaglandins) and a regulatory one including neuroendocrine messengers such as catecholamines and NPY.

Identification and functional studies of a specific peptide YY-preferring receptor in dog adipocytes.

Specific binding sites for peptide YY (PYY) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) as well as functional responses were identified in dog adipocytes. Studies were carried out using the radioligand [125I-Tyr1]monoiodo-PYY on crude adipocyte membranes. [125I]PYY bound to dog adipocyte membranes with a high affinity (156 +/- 24 pM) and binding capacity of 314 +/- 48 fmol/mg protein. Competition studies revealed a higher affinity of the binding sites for PYY than NPY (inhibition constants were 118 +/- 17 pM and 300 +/- 53 pM, respectively, P < or = 0.001). NPY analogs displaced [125I]PYY specific binding with the following order of potency: NPY-(13-36) > NPY-(18-36) > NPY-(22-36) >> [Leu31-Pro34]NPY. Neither adrenergic nor adenosine agents (activating or inhibiting other antilipolytic systems) interacted with [125I]PYY binding sites. So [125I]PYY binding was specific, saturable, and reversible. Lipolysis experiments performed with PYY, NPY, and NPY analogs confirm the relative order of potency found in competition experiments. The data agree with the definition of PYY-preferring receptor which resembles a Y2 receptor subtype since NPY-(13-36), a specific Y2 receptor agonist, inhibited binding and lipolysis in a similar way to PYY, whereas [Leu31-Pro34]NPY did not. No difference was observed in the antilipolytic response between IC50 values measured on omental, perirenal, and subcutaneous fat deposits. Moreover, PYY and NPY (10(-6) M) significantly attenuated forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels, involving inhibition of adenylyl cyclase as a transmembrane signaling mechanism. Cross-linking of bound [125I]PYY to membranes indicated that the mol wt of the receptor was 62K. The relative importance of such a receptor on fat cells alongside another powerful antilipolytic receptor--the alpha 2-adrenoceptor--is discussed.

Photoperiodic control of adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptors in Syrian hamsters: role of testosterone.

The impact of photoperiodic manipulations and testosterone treatments on the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenergic (alpha 2-AR), beta-adrenergic (beta-AR), and A1-adenosine (A1-R) responsiveness, was explored in male Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Moreover, binding studies were performed with appropriate alpha 2-AR, beta-AR, and A1-R radioligands to study receptor changes. Animals were kept for 12 weeks in long day photoperiod (LD: 16 h light (L)-8 h dark (D)), in short day photoperiod (SD: 6L-18D), or in short photoperiod with testosterone treatments (1 mg/animal/day sc) 10 days before sacrifice (SD+T). The antilipolytic effect of the full alpha 2-AR agonist UK14304 and the specific binding of the alpha 2-AR radioligands [3H] RX821002 (antagonist) and [3H]UK14304 were significantly reduced in SD hamsters compared with LD hamsters. The alpha 2-site number and alpha 2-AR responsiveness were completely restored in SD+T hamsters. Whatever the experimental conditions the adipocyte beta-AR receptivity (lipolytic response of isoproterenol and [125I]cyanopindolol binding), and the A1-R receptivity (antilipolytic response initiated by (-)phenylisopropyladenosine and [3H]dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine and [3H]phenylisopropyladenosine binding) remained unchanged. Moreover, the kidney and brain alpha 2-AR densities identified with [3H]RX821002 were not significantly different in LD, SD or SD+T hamsters. These results were obtained without any modification of animal weight, white adipose tissue weight, or white fat cell size. We conclude that, in the Syrian hamster, the expression of the adipocyte alpha 2-AR is under the control of the photoperiod by a testosterone-dependent mechanism probably mediated through the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, without any alteration of the animal fat stores.

Hamster adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor changes during fat mass modifications are not directly dependent on adipose tissue norepinephrine content.

It is questioned whether alterations of the sympathetic nervous system can explain the specific increment of the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor observed during white adipose tissue (WAT) enlargement and fat cell size increment. The impact of a 6-hydroxydopamine-induced sympathectomy, validated by determination of the WAT norepinephrine content, was tested on isolated white fat cell alpha 2-adrenoceptor function and binding [( 3H]RX 821002 and [3H]UK 14304 binding). Chemical sympathectomy of standard adult hamsters, neither alters the alpha 2-adrenergic-dependent antilipolysis nor the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenergic binding. A slight hypersensitivity of the beta 1-adrenergic lipolytic response was observed, without modification in beta-adrenergic binding [( 125I]cyanopindolol binding). Compared with controls, caloric restriction (10 days) of adult hamsters induced a large decrease in adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor (P less than 0.001) with a parallel decrement in the mean fat cell size (P less than 0.001) and alpha 2-adrenergic responsiveness while there was no significant variation of the WAT norepinephrine content (on a per pad basis). 6-Hydroxydopamine treatment of the restricted animals (from day 6 to day 9) induced a higher preservation of adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor density (P less than 0.001), no change in alpha 2-adrenergic responsiveness, and higher preservation of mean fat cell size (P less than 0.05) than in the restricted only animals. No significant modification in the beta-adrenergic binding was observed whatever the conditions. It was concluded that the specific increment in the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor during fat mass enlargement was not directly dependent on sympathetic nervous system alterations. Nevertheless, the sympathetic-dependent mobilization of the fat stores, after induction of caloric restriction, can indirectly modulate the alpha 2-adrenoceptor density in the adipocyte by promoting changes in white fat cell size.