Use of tigecycline for the management of Clostridium difficile colitis in oncology patients and case series of breakthrough infections.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most frequent cause of nosocomial diarrhoea in adults. Cancer patients, in particular, are at a higher risk for CDI. Limited clinical data exist regarding the use of tigecycline for the treatment of CDI, especially in patients with oncologic and haematologic malignancies. AIM: To characterize the use of tigecycline for treatment of CDI in oncology patients at an academic cancer centre. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre, single-arm, chart review evaluating the use of tigecycline for the management of CDI in oncology patients at an academic cancer centre. FINDINGS: The median age of CDI diagnosis in this patient group (N=66) was 65 years (range: 16-84) and the majority of patients had solid tumour malignancies. Fifty-six percent of patients had severe CDI, 70.3% of which were classified as having severe complicated disease. The median time to initiation of tigecycline therapy was 2 days (mean: 3.83) and the median number of tigecycline doses was 13 (range: 1-50). Twelve non-CDI breakthrough infections were observed, and four patients developed CDI while receiving tigecycline for non-CDI indications. The rate of death was 18% and the recurrence rate was 15.2%. CONCLUSION: Tigecycline did not lead to overt benefits in outcomes of oncology patients with CDI when compared to historical data. In addition, several breakthrough CDIs were observed in patients who received the drug for a non-CDI indication. Further prospective research is needed to validate the use of tigecycline for management of CDI.

Practice guidelines for lipid-based amphotericin B in stem cell transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinicians who practice in the stem cell transplantation (SCT) setting with practical guidelines for the use of lipid-based amphotericin B (AmB) formulations in SCT patients who have documented or probable invasive fungal infections, are experiencing neutropenic fever, or require secondary prophylaxis for fungal infections. DATA SOURCES: Recommendations are based on the results of a two-day consensus meeting that convened clinicians versed in the management of infectious complications in patients undergoing SCT. This meeting, which was held October 21-23, 1998, in Orlando, Florida, was sponsored by an educational grant from The Liposome Company. In addition, primary articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1980-December 1999) and through secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Immunocompromised patients, particularly patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with SCT, experience a high degree of morbidity and mortality from invasive fungal infections. Historically, treatment for such infections with conventional AmB had been limited primarily by its associated nephrotoxicity. Lipid-based formulations of AmB have helped to advance the management of invasive fungal infections in the SCT population by offering a treatment alternative that allows for administration of adequate amounts of active drug to produce clinical and mycologic responses, compared with conventional AmB, in a delivery system that is less nephrotoxic. Unfortunately, these agents are relatively expensive. Therefore, patients who are candidates for lipid-based products must be selected carefully. CONCLUSIONS: Practical guidelines are provided for the use of lipid-based AmB formulations in SCT patients who have documented or probable invasive fungal infections, are experiencing neutropenic fever, or require secondary prophylaxis for fungal infections.