Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Educ Behav ; 33(6): 787-801, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16861585

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-service for public health nurses (PHNs) and accompanying educational materials could improve vaccine risk/benefit communication. The content and timing of vaccine communication were recorded during 246 pre-and 217 postintervention visits in two public health immunization clinics. Pre-/postintervention comparisons showed PHN communication of severe side effects (13% vs. 44%, p < .0001) and their management (29% vs. 60%, p < .0001) increased. There was no significant change in discussion of vaccine benefits (48% vs. 51%) or common side effects (91% vs. 92%),screening for contraindications (71% vs. 77%), or distribution of written information (89% vs. 92%). More parents initiated vaccine questions postintervention (27% vs. 39%,p < .01) and were more satisfied with vaccine-risk communication (8.1 vs. 8.9 on a 10-point scale, p < .01). Average vaccine communication time increased from 16 to 22 seconds (p < .01).


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Education , Health Promotion , Pamphlets , Parents/education , Public Health Nursing , Vaccines/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Contraindications , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Kansas , Louisiana , Male , Mass Screening , Nurse's Role , Professional-Family Relations , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...