Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
STAR Protoc ; 5(1): 102827, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219151

ABSTRACT

Here, we present a protocol to differentiate induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) into adherent hematopoietic progenitors that release floating CD14+ CD45+ monocytes into the culture medium. We describe steps for iPSC expansion, embryoid body (EB) formation, suspension culture, plating EBs, and recurring harvests of monocytes, a.k.a. "monocyte factory." We then describe detailed procedures for freezing/thawing of monocytes and differentiation into polarized M1 and M2 macrophages. This protocol provides foundation to study iPSC monocytes and their progenies such as macrophages, microglial, and dendritic cells. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Karlson et al.1 and Panicker et al.2.


Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , Monocytes , Humans , Macrophages , Cell Differentiation , Embryoid Bodies
2.
J Electrocardiol ; 67: 110-114, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139617

ABSTRACT

Peri- and post-procedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a rare complication after leadless pacemaker implantation and requires an individualized approach. In this case report we describe the management of VT in a patient with subendocardial scarring due to prior coronary artery disease who presented with monomorphic VT the day after implant. The etiology was found to be related to the novel ventricular activation wavefront by ventricular pacing which induced a reentrant circuit dependent on pre-existing myocardial substrate. Invasive electrophysiologic study and ablation is a safe and successful treatment strategy in selected patients with evidence of myocardial scarring.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Pacemaker, Artificial , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Electrocardiography , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Heart Ventricles , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Treatment Outcome
3.
Am Heart J ; 220: 246-252, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911261

ABSTRACT

Approximately 5% of patients with sarcoidosis have clinically manifest cardiac involvement. Clinical features of Cardiac Sarcoidosis are dependent on the location, extent, and activity of the disease. First line therapy is usually with prednisone and this is recommended based on clinician experience, expert opinion and small observational cohorts. There are no published clinical trials in cardiac sarcoidosis and multiple experts in the field have called for randomized clinical trials to answer important patient care questions. Corticosteroid are associated with multiple adverse effects including hypertension, diabetes, weight gain, osteoporosis, and increased risk of infections. In contrast Methotrexate is generally well tolerated and is increasingly used in other forms of sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES: The Cardiac Sarcoidosis Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (CHASM CS-RCT; NCT03593759) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the optimal initial treatment strategy for patients with active cardiac sarcoidosis. We hypothesize that (1) a low dose prednisone/methotrexate combination will have non-inferior efficacy to standard dose prednisone and that (2) the low dose prednisone/ methotrexate combination will result in significantly better quality of life than standard dose prednisone, as a result of reduced burden of side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: Eligible study subjects will have active clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis presenting with one or more of the following clinical findings: advanced conduction system disease, significant sinus node dysfunction, non-sustained or sustained ventricular arrhythmia, left ventricular dysfunction or right ventricular dysfunction. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day for 6 months (maximum dose 30 mg daily) OR to prednisone 20 mg daily for 1 month, then 10 mg daily for 1 month, then 5 mg daily for one month then stop AND methotrexate 15-20 mg once weekly for 6 months. The primary endpoint is summed perfusion rest score on 6-month PET (blinded core-lab review). The summed perfusion rest score is measure of myocardial fibrosis/scar. The design is non-inferiority with a sample size of 97 per group. DISCUSSION: Given the multiorgan system potential adverse side effects of prednisone, proving noninferiority of an alternate regimen would be sufficient to make the alternative compare favorably to standard dose steroids. This is the first ever clinical trial in cardiac sarcoidosis and thus in addition to the listed goals of the trial, we will also establish a multi-center, multinational cardiac sarcoidosis clinical trials network. Such a collaborative infrastructure will enable a new era of high quality data to guide physicians when treating cardiac sarcoidosis patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sarcoidosis/drug therapy , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Research Design , Sarcoidosis/complications
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32476932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with sarcoidosis can present with cardiac symptoms as the first manifestation of disease in any organ. In these patients, the use of chest imaging modalities may serve as an initial screening tool towards the diagnosis of sarcoidosis through identification of pulmonary/mediastinal involvement; however, the use of chest imaging for this purpose has not been well studied. We assessed the utility of different chest imaging modalities for initial screening for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients were investigated with chest x-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) and/or cardiac/thorax magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We then used the final diagnosis (CS versus no CS) and adjudicated imaging reports (normal versus abnormal) to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of individual and combinations of chest imaging modalities. We identified 44 patients (mean age 54 (±8) years, 35.4% female) and a diagnosis of CS was made in 18/44 patients (41%). The sensitivity and specificity for screening for sarcoidosis were 35% and 85% for chest x-ray, respectively (AUC 0.60; 95%CI 0.42-0.78; p value=0.27); 94% and 86% for chest CT (AUC 0.90; 95%CI 0.80-1.00; p value <0.001); 100% and 50% for cardiac/thorax MRI (AUC 0.75; 95%CI 0.56-0.94; p value=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: During the initial diagnostic workup of patients with suspected CS, chest x-ray was suboptimal as a screening test. In contrast CT chest and cardiac/thorax MRI had excellent sensitivity. Chest CT has the highest specificity among imaging modalities. Cardiac/thorax MRI or chest CT could be used as an initial screening test, depending on local availability.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiography, Thoracic , Sarcoidosis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...