Sexual Function in Women with Breast Cancer: An Evidence Map of Observational Studies.

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer in women, and has implications for sexual function (SF). In this study, we used an evidence map to identify, describe, and organise the current available evidence regarding SF in women with BC. We searched the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases for observational studies assessing SF in women with BC published in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French between 2000 and 2021 (sample ≥ 50 women). Of the 64 included studies (13,257 women with BC), 58 were published since 2010. Women who were married, partnered, or in relationships represented 74.1% of the entire sample. Only a single study was conducted on women representing a sexual minority. We identified 22 assessment instruments and 40 sexual dysfunction (SdF) domains. The number of publications on SF in women with BC has increased in the last 10 years, but still remains low. Some groups of women are underrepresented, and some SdF domains are underdiagnosed, with the assessment instrument used affecting which domains are studied. Women with BC need to be better screened, as their quality of life (QoL) is affected by SdF.

Mammographic features of benign breast lesions and risk of subsequent breast cancer in women attending breast cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mammographic features in women with benign breast disease (BBD) and the risk of subsequent breast cancer according to their mammographic findings. METHODS: We analyzed data from a Spanish cohort of women screened from 1995 to 2015 and followed up until December 2017 (median follow-up, 5.9 years). We included 10,650 women who had both histologically confirmed BBD and mammographic findings. We evaluated proliferative and nonproliferative BBD subtypes, and their mammographic features: architectural distortion, asymmetries, calcifications, masses, and multiple findings. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for breast cancer were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. We plotted the adjusted cumulative incidence curves. RESULTS: Calcifications were more frequent in proliferative disease with atypia (43.9%) than without atypia (36.8%) or nonproliferative disease (22.2%; p value < 0.05). Masses were more frequent in nonproliferative lesions (59.1%) than in proliferative lesions without atypia (35.1%) or with atypia (30.0%; p value < 0.05). Multiple findings and architectural distortion were more likely in proliferative disease (16.1% and 4.7%) than in nonproliferative disease (12.8% and 1.9%). Subsequent breast cancer occurred in 268 (2.5%) women. Compared with women who had masses, the highest risk of subsequent breast cancer was found in those with architectural distortions (aHR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.16-4.22), followed by those with multiple findings (aHR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.34-2.66), asymmetries (aHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.84-3.28), and calcifications (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.21-2.12). CONCLUSION: BBD subtypes showed distinct mammographic findings. The risk of subsequent breast cancer was high in those who have shown architectural distortion, multiple findings, asymmetries, and calcifications than in women with masses. KEY POINTS: • The presence of mammographic findings in women attending breast cancer screening helps clinicians to assess women with benign breast disease (BBD). • Calcifications were frequent in BBDs with atypia, which are the ones with a high breast cancer risk, while masses were common in low-risk BBDs. • The excess risk of subsequent breast cancer in women with BBD was higher in those who showed architectural distortion compared to those with masses.

Appropriateness of surgery performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm at tertiary hospitals in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the appropriateness of the type of repair (open or endovascular) performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in five university hospitals in Spain, according to evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with AAA who underwent elective open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Data were collected on demographic and clinical variables and type of surgical repair. A pair of vascular surgeons from each participating hospital performed a blinded assessment based on GRADE recommendations. The concordance between the two evaluators and the agreement between their evidence-based recommendation and the procedure performed were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were selected; 179 were included. Mean age was 72.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.4), mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.04 (SD, 1.9). OSR was performed in 53.2% (N.=99) and EVAR in 46.8% (N.=87) of cases. Overall, 65.9% (118/179) of interventions performed were considered appropriate: 50% (47/94) of OSRs and 83.5% (71/85) of EVARs. The patient characteristics were similar for all the hospitals, but the chosen surgical technique did show significant differences among these centers. There were no significant differences among the hospitals in the proportion of cases judged as appropriate, either overall (P=0.346) or for each type of procedure (P=0.531 and P=0.538 for OSR and EVAR, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most of the AAA repairs performed were appropriate according to GRADE recommendations. A higher proportion of EVARs were considered appropriate than OSRs. Choice of AAA repair should be standardized using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, while incorporating patient preferences, to reduce the existing variability and ensure appropriate selection of AAA repair technique.

Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.

Risk of breast cancer two years after a benign biopsy depends on the mammographic feature prompting recall.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore whether the type of mammographic feature prompting a false-positive recall (FPR) during mammography screening influences the risk and timing of breast cancer diagnosis, particularly if assessed with invasive procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We included information on women screened and recalled for further assessment in Spain between 1994 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017, categorizing FPRs by the assessment (noninvasive or invasive) and mammographic feature prompting the recall. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer rates in the first two years after FPR (first period) and after two years (second period). RESULTS: The study included 99,825 women with FPRs. In both periods, the breast cancer rate was higher in the invasive assessment group than in the noninvasive group (first period 12 ‰ vs 1.9 ‰, p < 0.001; second period 4.4‰ vs 3.1‰, p < 0.001). During the first period, the invasive assessment group showed diverse breast cancer rates for each type of mammographic feature, with a higher rate for asymmetric density (31.9‰). When the second period was compared with the first, the breast cancer rate decreased in the invasive assessment group (from 12‰ to 4.4‰, p < 0.001) and increased in the noninvasive assessment group (from 1.9‰ to 3.1‰, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the context of mammography screening, the risk of breast cancer diagnosis during the first two years after FPR was particularly high for women undergoing invasive assessment; importantly, the risk was modified by type of mammographic feature prompting the recall. This information could help to individualize follow-up after exclusion of malignancy.

Differences in breast cancer risk after benign breast disease by type of screening diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess differences in breast cancer risk across benign breast disease diagnosed at prevalent or incident screens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data from 629,087 women participating in a long-standing population-based breast cancer screening program in Spain. Each benign breast disease was classified as non-proliferative, proliferative without atypia, or proliferative with atypia, and whether it was diagnosed in a prevalent or incident screen. We used partly conditional Cox hazard regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of the risk of breast cancer. RESULTS: Compared with women without benign breast disease, the risk of breast cancer was significantly higher (p-value = 0.005) in women with benign breast disease diagnosed in an incident screen (aHR, 2.67; 95%CI: 2.24-3.19) than in those with benign breast disease diagnosed in a prevalent screen (aHR, 1.87; 95%CI: 1.57-2.24). The highest risk was found in women with a proliferative benign breast disease with atypia (aHR, 4.35; 95%CI: 2.09-9.08, and 3.35; 95%CI: 1.51-7.40 for those diagnosed at incident and prevalent screens, respectively), while the lowest was found in women with non-proliferative benign breast disease (aHR, 2.39; 95%CI: 1.95-2.93, and 1.63; 95%CI: 1.32-2.02 for those diagnosed at incident and prevalent screens, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the risk of breast cancer conferred by a benign breast disease differed according to type of screen (prevalent or incident). To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of the screening type on benign breast disease prognosis.

A survey to assess awareness and opinion of initiatives and recommendations on low-value diagnostic practices.

BACKGROUND: The need to reduce healthcare practices that provide no value has led to the development of initiatives that generate and publish recommendations to improve the appropriateness of clinical practice by identifying potentially inappropriate services, making recommendations, and proposing improvements. DianaHealth (www.dianahealth.com) identifies, classifies, and publishes recommendations from numerous scientific societies. The purpose of this study was to determine the awareness and perceived usefulness and applicability of published recommendations on low-value diagnostic measures, as judged by physicians who are recognised clinical leaders in their respective centres. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire on the diagnostic recommendations considered relevant for each medical specialty and made it available, until September 2016, on DianaHealth. The survey was administered online to clinical leaders from 25 Spanish healthcare centres (hospitals and primary care centres). RESULTS: A total of 413 (40.0%) physicians from 34 different specialties participated. The participation rate varied between centres (range 21.1%-100.0%) and specialties (range 12.5%-78.9%). Do Not Do (57.1%) was the most widely-known initiative. Most participants (82.6%; IQR 77.9%-94.9%) stated that they knew at least one of the 12 initiatives that identify non-recommended practices, and on average they were aware of four initiatives (range 1-12). The initiatives were perceived useful by 82.4% (IQR 73.3%-90.4%), and perceived applicable by 75.6% (IQR 67.4%-86.8%). A total of 531 recommendations were assessed. Sixty-three percent (IQR 53.6%-77.5%) of participants reported they were aware of the recommendations for their corresponding specialty. A total of 84.5% (IQR 75.0%-90.0%) stated they agreed with the recommendations and 84.5% (IQR 75.0%-90.0%) considered them useful. Among those who agreed with their respective recommendations, a median of 51.5% (IQR 41.4%-60.9%) perceived the guidelines as being fully implemented, 40.1% (IQR 31.9%-46.8%) considered them partially implemented, and 7.1% (IQR 3.7%-12.9%), not implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical leaders' awareness of initiatives that generate and publish recommendations to improve clinical appropriateness remains low, although they did consider them useful. In general, participants were familiar with their speciality-specific diagnostic recommendations, agreed with them, and perceived them as useful and implemented in their centres. More needs to be done to raise awareness among professionals who do not know of or apply these recommendations.

Descriptive and follow-up study of patients treated surgically for abdominal aortic aneurysm at tertiary hospitals in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess potential variability in the clinical characteristics and treatment of patients undergoing elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) across five hospitals in Spain. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with AAA and treated with open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We evaluated clinical and demographic variables, including comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]); anatomic characteristics; surgical risk (ASA Score); aneurysm characteristics; and in-hospital and overall mortality. All patients were followed for three years. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were included, mean age 72.5 (standard deviation [SD], 8.4), mean CCI 2.04 (SD, 1.9). The surgical technique was EVAR in 46.8% of cases (N.=87) and OSR in 53.2% (N.=99). The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.2%, with no differences between groups. The overall mortality rate during follow-up (mean, 2.9 years) was 24.1% for EVAR versus 8.1% for the OSR group (odds ratio [OR], 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.60-3.64; P=0.004). EVAR was the only independent risk factor for mortality (OR, 3.89; 95% CI: 3.87-3.92; P=0.004). Inter-center variability in the type of surgery was high, with EVAR accounting for 19.4% to 75% of the surgical procedures, depending on the treating center (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study the in-hospital mortality rates for elective EVAR and OSR were similar. However, after the follow-up, patients who underwent EVAR had a three-fold greater mortality rate than those treated with OSR. There was substantial inter-hospital variability, underscoring the need to standardize treatment selection in patients who undergo elective surgery for AAA repair.

Variation in the choice of elective surgical procedure for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: The two main surgical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to analyze variation among Spanish hospitals in the use of OSR or EVAR for AAA. A secondary aim was to assess changes in preferences for these two procedures over time. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study based on discharge data from public hospitals in Spain during 2002-2012. Patient inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, elective admission, primary diagnosis of unruptured AAA, and surgical treatment with OSR or EVAR. The characteristics of the treating center, patients, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. RESULTS: We included 16,737 patients from 114 hospitals; 6,809 (40.7%) underwent EVAR and 9,928 (59.3%) underwent OSR. The total volume of surgeries increased throughout the period, and the probability that any given procedure was EVAR increased by 20% per year (OR 1.20, P<0.001). The volume and distribution of the two procedures varied highly across the participating hospitals. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 3.6% and it decreased during the study period (5.3% in 2002 and 3.2% in 2012), mainly due to a decrease in OSR-related mortality, despite a slight increase in EVAR-related mortality. Hospitals with higher surgical volumes were more likely to use EVAR and have lower in-hospital mortality rates. CONCLUSION: This study reveals high variability in the surgical treatment of unruptured AAA across Spanish hospitals. The number of interventions has increased in recent years, with EVAR accounting for a growing percentage of these surgical procedures. Overall in-hospital mortality rates decreased significantly during this period, mainly due to lower mortality among patients undergoing OSR. In-hospital mortality rates were lower in higher-volume centers, regardless of the surgical approach used. Further research on variability and appropriateness of surgical management of AAA is required to assess the suitability of concentrating elective AAA repair in more experienced centers to potentially achieve better outcomes.

GRADE-Based Recommendations for Surgical Repair of Nonruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for patients with a nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement and adhered to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Both low- and high surgical risk patients treated with EVAR showed decreased 30-day mortality, but the low-risk group had no differences in 4-year mortality. Compared with friendly anatomy, patients with hostile anatomy had an increased risk of type I endoleak. Young patients may prefer OSR. Endovascular aneurysm repair was not cost-effective in Europe. Four conditional recommendations were formulated: (1) OSR for low-risk patients up to 80 years old, (2) EVAR for low-risk patients older than 80 years, (3) EVAR for high-risk patients as long as is anatomically feasible, and (4) OSR in patients in whom it is not anatomically feasible to perform EVAR. Based on GRADE criteria, either OSR or EVAR can be suggested to patients with nonruptured AAA taking into account their surgical risk, hostile anatomy, and age. Given the weakness of the recommendations, personal preferences are determinant.

Cáncer de mama y reconstrucción en hospital de tercer nivel de Castilla y León, España / Breast cancer and reconstruction in Castilla & León third level hospital, Spain

Introducción y Objetivo: Los estudios sobre cáncer y reconstrucción mamaria con datos referentes a técnicas quirúrgicas, complicaciones y resultados, ayudan a los profesionales a realizar la mejor indicación terapéutica según las características y expectativas de las pacientes y con el menor número posible de complicaciones. Nuestro objetivo es valorar dichos datos en el Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, centro integrado en el Sistema Público Español de Salud. Material y Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de 254 pacientes sometidas a cirugía oncológica mamaria y reconstrucción entre 2005 y 2012 en el Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León. Estudio de 30 variables relacionadas con la paciente, el tumor, la reconstrucción y el seguimiento. Análisis estadístico de variables cualitativas, cuantitativas y aplicación de metodología de Kaplan-Meier y Curvas de Supervivencia. Resultados: Nuestros datos muestran que en las pacientes sometidas a reconstrucción mamaria, el tratamiento oncológico previo más frecuente es la mastectomía radical modificada combinada con quimioterapia (71%) y con radioterapia (45%). La reconstrucción habitual es diferida mediante expansión-implante y si asocia radioterapia, mediante colgajo de dorsal ancho. Las complicaciones más frecuentes son contractura capsular, seroma en espalda y necrosis grasa, con un 40% de reintervenciones por complicaciones y un 18.5% fallo de la técnica con nueva reconstrucción. Conclusiones: El análisis de los datos relativos a reconstrucción mamaria permite conocer los resultados y complicaciones y establecer la evolución de la actividad en el Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León a lo largo de los años. Dichos resultados, en ocasiones subóptimos, han llevado a introducir cambios en los protocolos de selección de las pacientes para cada técnica, al abandono de las técnicas exclusivas con implantes en pacientes sometidas a radioterapia, y a la introducción de técnicas microquirúrgicas y de lipoinjerto

Background and Objective: Studies on cancer and breast reconstruction based on data related to surgical techniques, complications and outcomes, help professionals to make the best therapeutic indication according to the characteristics and expectations of patients, with the least possible number of complications. Our objective is the valuation of the data in the León Universitary Sanitary Complex wich is an institution integrated in the Spanish Public Health System. Methods: Observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 254 patients having oncological surgery and breast reconstruction in the period 2005-2012 in the León Universitary Complex. Study of 30 variables related to the patient, tumor, reconstruction and corresponding follow-up. Statistical analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables, and application of Kaplan-Meier methodology and Survival Curves methodology. Results: Our data show that in patients having a reconstruction due to breast cancer, the usual oncological treatment is modified radical mastectomy combined with chemotherapy (71%) and with radiotherapy treatment (45%). The usual reconstruction is deferred with the expansion-implant technique and, in case of radiotherapy, using the latissimus dorsi muscle flap. The most frequent complications are: capsular contracture, back seroma and fat necrosis. There are 40% re-interventions due to complications and 18.5% failures of the technique with a new reconstruction. Conclusions: The analysis of the data related to breast reconstruction allows evaluating the outcomes and complications as well as the evolution of the activity over the years in the León Universitary Sanitary Complex. These results, sometimes suboptimal, have triggered the introduction of changes in the protocols used to assign a treatment technique to a patient, the abandonment of exclusive techniques with implants in patients having received radiotherapy, and the introduction of microsurgical and lipograft techniques

Influence of Social Determinants, Lifestyle, Emotional Well-Being and the Use of Unconventional Therapies in Breast Cancer Progression in a Cohort of Women in Barcelona: Protocol for the DAMA Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer continues to be the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. Breast cancer survivors face numerous problems, especially after completing the first year of intense treatment. We present the protocol for an ongoing study to analyze the impact of a series of factors on breast cancer survival related to lifestyle, emotional well-being, and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). OBJECTIVE: We aim to analyze the influence of social determinants, lifestyle changes, emotional well-being, and use of CAM in the progression of breast cancer in women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2003 and 2013 in Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: We will perform a mixed cohort study (prospective and retrospective) of women diagnosed with breast cancer, created using a convenience sample in which we study the evolution of the disease (relapse, death, or remaining disease-free). Once identified, we sent the women information about the study and an informed consent form that they are required to sign in order to participate; a total of 2235 women were recruited. We obtained the following information from all participants: sociodemographic profile via a phone interview, and a self-administered survey of information about the study's objectives (lifestyles, emotional well-being, health care services, and the use of CAM). Lastly, we examined clinical records to obtain data on the tumor at the time of diagnosis, the treatment received, the occurrence of relapses (if any), and the tumor typology. We present data on the women's social profile based on descriptive data obtained from the telephone interview (welcome survey). RESULTS: Based on the welcome survey, which was completed by 2712 women, 14.42% (391/2712) of respondents were <50 years of age, 45.50% (1234/2712) were between 50 and 65 years of age, and 40.08% (1087/2712) were >65 years of age. A total of 43.69% (1185/2712) belonged to the highest social classes (I and II), 31.27% (848/2712) to the middle class (III), and 23.49% (637/2712) to the working classes (IV and V). Approximately 22.71% (616/2712) lived alone, 38.31% (1039/2712) lived with one person, and 38.97% (1057/2712) lived with two or more people. CONCLUSIONS: We obtained information from a large cohort of women, but this study has limitations related to the convenience sampling strategy, one of which is reduced representativeness. Conversely, being a self-administered survey, the study introduces biases, especially from respondents that answered on paper. However, the information that the study provides will serve as the basis for designing future interventions aimed at improving the knowledge gaps indicated for women with breast cancer.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection in pregnant women and mother-to-child transmission of genital HPV genotypes: a prospective study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Studies on HPV infection in pregnant women and HPV transmission to the child have yielded inconsistent results. METHODS: To estimate mother-to-child HPV transmission we carried out a prospective cohort study that included 66 HPV-positive and 77 HPV-negative pregnant women and their offspring attending a maternity hospital in Barcelona. To estimate HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in pregnancy we also carried out a related screening survey of cervical HPV-DNA detection among 828 pregnant women. Cervical cells from the mother were collected at pregnancy (mean of 31 weeks) and at the 6-week post-partum visit. Exfoliated cells from the mouth and external genitalia of the infants were collected around birth, at the 6-week post-partum visit, and around 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of age. All samples were tested for HPV using PCR. Associations between potential determinants of HPV infection in pregnant women and of HPV positivity in infants were also explored by logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: Overall cervical HPV-DNA detection in pregnant women recruited in the HPV screening survey was 6.5% (54/828). Sexual behavior-related variables, previous histories of genital warts or sexually transmitted infections, and presence of cytological abnormalities were statistically significantly and positively associated with HPV DNA detection in pregnant women recruited in the cohort. At 418 infant visits and a mean follow-up time of 14 months, 19.7% of infants born to HPV-positive mothers and 16.9% of those born to HPV-negative mothers tested HPV positive at some point during infants' follow-up. The most frequently detected genotype both in infants and mothers was HPV-16, after excluding untyped HPV infections. We found a strong and statistically significant association between mother's and child's HPV status at the 6-week post-partum visit. Thus, children of mothers' who were HPV-positive at the post-partum visit were about 5 times more likely to test HPV-positive than children of corresponding HPV-negative mothers (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the risk of vertical transmission of HPV genotypes is relatively low. HPV persistence in infants is a rare event. These data also indicate that vertical transmission may not be the sole source of HPV infections in infants and provides partial evidence for horizontal mother-to-child HPV transmission.

[Lung cancer in Spain: the current situation. 2008 SESPAS Report]. / El control del cáncer de pulmón en España: un análisis de la situación actual. Informe SESPAS 2008.

Lung cancer is currently the most frequent cause of death from cancer worldwide, warranting periodic analysis of the development and results of strategies aimed at reducing the incidence, mortality and morbidity related to this disease in Spain. PREVENTIVE ASPECTS: Mortality reduction among men contrasts with the increase observed in women, reflecting changes in tobacco exposure in the last few decades. Prevention programs aimed specifically at women and youngsters should be developed. In addition, the current law of smoking prevention should be amplified and vigorously applied. ASPECTS RELATED TO EARLY DIAGNOSIS: So far, there is insufficient scientific evidence to initiate a population-based lung cancer screening program. Preferential health care circuits are required to guarantee coordination among centres and levels of care and to substantially reduce current delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lung cancer. TREATMENT-RELATED ASPECTS: Therapeutic decisions in all lung cancer patients should be based on teamwork and scientific evidence. Palliative care deserves the same priority as oncological treatments. Lung cancer patients should participate more fully in therapeutic decisions. Better information systems are required for clinical assessment and research on this disease.

El control del cáncer de pulmón en España: un análisis de la situación actual. Informe SESPAS 2008 / Lung cancer in Spain: the current situation. 2008 SESPAS Report

El cáncer de pulmón es actualmente la causa más frecuentede muerte por cáncer en el mundo. Por ello, es pertinente analizarperiódicamente el desarrollo y los resultados de las estrategiasdirigidas a reducir su incidencia, mortalidad y morbilidaden España.Aspectos preventivos: La reducción de la mortalidad por cáncerde pulmón entre los hombres contrasta con el incrementoobservado entre las mujeres, lo cual plasma los cambiosexperimentados en la exposición al tabaco durante las últimasdécadas. Es necesario desarrollar programas de prevencióndirigidos específicamente a las mujeres y a los jóvenesy, asimismo, ampliar y aplicar en toda su extensión la vigenteLey de Prevención del Tabaquismo.Aspectos relacionados con el diagnóstico precoz: De momentono hay suficiente evidencia científica para iniciar ningúncribado poblacional del cáncer de pulmón. Son necesariosunos circuitos asistenciales preferentes que aseguren lacoordinación entre centros y niveles asistenciales y reduzcansustancialmente las demoras actuales en el diagnóstico y eltratamiento del cáncer de pulmón.Aspectos relacionados con el tratamiento: Todos los pacientescon cáncer de pulmón deberían tratarse sobre la base dedecisiones colegiadas y la evidencia científica. La atención paliativaha de recibir la misma prioridad que los tratamientos oncológicos.Hay que incrementar la participación de los pacientescon cáncer de pulmón en las decisiones terapéuticas queles atañen. Se requieren mejores sistemas de información parala evaluación y la investigación clínica de esta enfermedad(AU)

Lung cancer is currently the most frequent cause of deathfrom cancer worldwide, warranting periodic analysis of thedevelopment and results of strategies aimed at reducing theincidence, mortality and morbidity related to this disease inSpain.Preventive aspects: Mortality reduction among men contrastswith the increase observed in women, reflecting changes intobacco exposure in the last few decades. Prevention programsaimed specifically at women and youngsters should be developed.In addition, the current law of smoking preventionshould be amplified and vigorously applied.Aspects related to early diagnosis: So far, there is insufficientscientific evidence to initiate a population-based lung cancerscreening program. Preferential health care circuits are requiredto guarantee coordination among centres and levels ofcare and to substantially reduce current delays in the diagnosisand treatment of patients with lung cancer.Treatment-related aspects: Therapeutic decisions in alllung cancer patients should be based on teamwork and scientificevidence. Palliative care deserves the same priority as oncologicaltreatments. Lung cancer patients should participatemore fully in therapeutic decisions. Better information systemsare required for clinical assessment and research on this disease(AU)

El control del cáncer de pulmón en España: un análisis de la situación actual. Informe SESPAS 2008 / Lung cancer in Spain: the current situation. 2008 SESPAS Report

El cáncer de pulmón es actualmente la causa más frecuente de muerte por cáncer en el mundo. Por ello, es pertinente analizar periódicamente el desarrollo y los resultados de las estrategias dirigidas a reducir su incidencia, mortalidad y morbilidad en España. Aspectos preventivos: La reducción de la mortalidad por cáncer de pulmón entre los hombres contrasta con el incremento observado entre las mujeres, lo cual plasma los cambios experimentados en la exposición al tabaco durante las últimas décadas. Es necesario desarrollar programas de prevención dirigidos específicamente a las mujeres y a los jóvenes y, asimismo, ampliar y aplicar en toda su extensión la vigente Ley de Prevención del Tabaquismo. Aspectos relacionados con el diagnóstico precoz: De momento no hay suficiente evidencia científica para iniciar ningún cribado poblacional del cáncer de pulmón. Son necesarios unos circuitos asistenciales preferentes que aseguren la coordinación entre centros y niveles asistenciales y reduzcan sustancialmente las demoras actuales en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento del cáncer de pulmón. Aspectos relacionados con el tratamiento: Todos los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón deberían tratarse sobre la base de decisiones colegiadas y la evidencia científica. La atención paliativa ha de recibir la misma prioridad que los tratamientos oncológicos. Hay que incrementar la participación de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón en las decisiones terapéuticas que les atañen. Se requieren mejores sistemas de información para la evaluación y la investigación clínica de esta enfermedad

Lung cancer is currently the most frequent cause of death from cancer worldwide, warranting periodic analysis of the development and results of strategies aimed at reducing the incidence, mortality and morbidity related to this disease in Spain. Preventive aspects: Mortality reduction among men contrasts with the increase observed in women, reflecting changes in tobacco exposure in the last few decades. Prevention programs aimed specifically at women and youngsters should be developed. In addition, the current law of smoking prevention should be amplified and vigorously applied. Aspects related to early diagnosis: So far, there is insufficient scientific evidence to initiate a population-based lung cancer screening program. Preferential health care circuits are required to guarantee coordination among centres and levels of care and to substantially reduce current delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lung cancer. Treatment-related aspects: Therapeutic decisions in all lung cancer patients should be based on teamwork and scientific evidence. Palliative care deserves the same priority as oncological treatments. Lung cancer patients should participate more fully in therapeutic decisions. Better information systems are required for clinical assessment and research on this disease

Infección por los virus del papiloma humano y de la inmunodeficiencia humana como factores de riesgo para el cáncer de cuello uterino en mujeres reclusas / Human papillomavirus and human immunodeficiency virus as risk factors for cervical cancer among imprisoned women

Fundamento: La identificación de grupos de alto riesgo para infección genital por el virus del papiloma humano puede contribuir a la prevención precoz del carcinoma de cuello uterino. El estudio fue diseñado para estimar la prevalencia y factores determinantes de infección por el virus del papiloma humano cervical y el riesgo de cáncer de cuello uterino en reclusas en régimen preventivo. Pacientes y métodos: Se estudiaron 157 mujeres a su ingreso en el Centro Penitenciario de Mujeres de Barcelona. Se les realizaron visita ginecológica, entrevista estructurada, exfoliado cervical y muestra de sangre para la detección del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y virus de la hepatitis B y C. La infección por el virus del papiloma humano se determinó mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa. Resultados: La prevalencia de ADN del virus del papiloma humano fue del 46 por ciento. El 38,2 por ciento de las mujeres afirmaron haber practicado la prostitución y el 64,3 por ciento ser usuarias de drogas por vía parenteral (UDVP). El 56,1 por ciento fueron seropositivas para el VIH. La citología cervical reveló que 19 mujeres (12,1 por ciento) presentaban alteraciones escamosas de significado desconocido y 28 (17,7 por ciento), lesiones escamosas intraepiteliales (todos los grados). La infección del virus del papiloma humano se asoció a UDVP durante más de 10 años (odds ratio de la prevalencia [POR] = 2,9) y a seropositividad por VIH (POR = 4,7). El aumento de riesgo para lesiones escamosas intraepiteliales asociado a VIH se explica por la presencia de virus del papiloma humano. Las mujeres positivas para el VIH con recuento bajo de CD4 podrían tener mayor riesgo de presentar lesiones escamosas intraepiteliales. Conclusión: Las mujeres con VIH constituyen un grupo de alto riesgo para el virus del papiloma humano y, consecuentemente, para el desarrollo de lesiones preneoplásicas del cérvix. Se recomienda un control ginecológico frecuente en las mujeres positivas para el VIH y el virus del papiloma humano (AU)