Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33746555

ABSTRACT

The use of air sensor technology is increasing worldwide for a variety of applications, however, with significant variability in data quality. The United States Environmental Protection Agency held a workshop in July 2019 to deliberate possible performance targets for air sensors measuring particles with aerodynamic diameters of 10 µm or less (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). These performance targets were discussed from the perspective of non-regulatory applications and with the sensors operating primarily in a stationary mode in outdoor environments. Attendees included representatives from multiple levels of government organizations, sensor developers, environmental nonprofits, international organizations, and academia. The workshop addressed the current lack of sensor technology requirements, discussed fit-for-purpose data quality needs, and debated transparency issues. This paper highlights the purpose and key outcomes of the workshop. While more information on performance and applications of sensors is available than in past years, the performance metrics, or parameters used to describe data quality, vary among the studies reports and there is a need for more clear and consistent approaches for evaluating sensor performance. Organizations worldwide are increasingly considering, or are in the process of developing, sensor performance targets and testing protocols. Workshop participants suggested that these new guidelines are highly desirable, would help improve data quality, and would give users more confidence in their data. Given the wide variety of uses for sensors and user backgrounds, as well as varied sensor design features (e.g., communication approaches, data tools, processing/adjustment algorithms and calibration procedures), the need for transparency was a key workshop theme. Suggestions for increasing transparency included documenting and sharing testing and performance data, detailing best practices, and sharing data processing and correction approaches.

2.
Biomarkers ; 11(6): 507-23, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17056471

ABSTRACT

The utility of urinary trans-3'-hydroxy cotinine (3HC) as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure was investigated in comparison with urinary cotinine (COT), the sum (3HC + COT), and ratio of the two nicotine metabolites (3HC/COT). Participants were 150 ETS exposed children (aged 1-44 months) and their parents. Child urine samples were collected during 3weekly baseline assessments and at interviews administered 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after baseline. Findings indicate that 3HC and COT can be measured reliably (rho = 0.96, 0.88) and show equivalent levels of repeated measures stability (rho = 0.71, 0.75). COT, 3HC, and 3HC + COT showed equally strong associations with air nicotine levels, reported ETS contamination, and reported ETS exposure (r=0.60-0.70). The intraclass correlations of 3HC/COT were lower than those for COT or 3HC. Older children had a higher 3HC/COT ratio than younger children (3.5 versus 2.2), and non-Hispanic White children had a higher ratio than African-American children (3.2 versus 1.9). These findings suggest that COT, 3HC, and 3HC + COT are approximately equivalent and equally strong biomarkers of ETS exposure in children. Moreover, 3HC/COT may provide a useful indicator to investigate age- and race-related differences in the metabolism of COT and 3HC.


Subject(s)
Cotinine/analogs & derivatives , Cotinine/urine , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis , Age Factors , Air Pollutants , Biomarkers/urine , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Nicotine/analysis , Nicotine/metabolism , Racial Groups
3.
Cancer Lett ; 222(1): 119-24, 2005 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15837549

ABSTRACT

Human mammary carcinoma MCF-7 cell line responsiveness to the pteridines xanthopterin and isoxanthopterin was studied using the MTS assay for measurement of cell viability. The pteridines were tested at concentrations ranging from 7.8 to 500 microM singly and in 11 isoxanthopterin:xanthopterin ratios. IC50s of xanthopterin and isoxanthopterin were 109+/-13 microM (mean+/-SEM of y estimate) and 103+/-9 microM, respectively. The IC50 values for pteridine mixtures were similar although 3:1 and 4:1 isoxanthopterin:xanthopterin ratios seemed slightly more cytotoxic than other mixtures. However, ANOVA revealed no statistical differences in the cytotoxicity of mixtures.


Subject(s)
Cell Survival/drug effects , Xanthopterin/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Humans , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Xanthopterin/toxicity
4.
Tob Control ; 13(1): 29-37, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14985592

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) whether dust and surfaces in households of smokers are contaminated with environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); (2) whether smoking parents can protect their infants by smoking outside and away from the infant; and (3) whether contaminated dust, surfaces, and air contribute to ETS exposure in infants. DESIGN: Quasi-experiment comparing three types of households with infants: (1) non-smokers who believe they have protected their children from ETS; (2) smokers who believe they have protected their children from ETS; (3) smokers who expose their children to ETS. SETTING: Homes of smokers and non-smokers. PARTICIPANTS: Smoking and non-smoking mothers and their infants < or = 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ETS contamination as measured by nicotine in household dust, indoor air, and household surfaces. ETS exposure as measured by cotinine levels in infant urine. RESULTS: ETS contamination and ETS exposure were 5-7 times higher in households of smokers trying to protect their infants by smoking outdoors than in households of non-smokers. ETS contamination and exposure were 3-8 times higher in households of smokers who exposed their infants to ETS by smoking indoors than in households of smokers trying to protect their children by smoking outdoors. CONCLUSIONS: Dust and surfaces in homes of smokers are contaminated with ETS. Infants of smokers are at risk of ETS exposure in their homes through dust, surfaces, and air. Smoking outside the home and away from the infant reduces but does not completely protect a smoker's home from ETS contamination and a smoker's infant from ETS exposure.


Subject(s)
Dust , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis , Child, Preschool , Cotinine/analysis , Cotinine/urine , Female , Hair/chemistry , Humans , Infant , Male , Nicotine/analysis , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...