Usefulness of endoluminal catheter colonization surveillance cultures to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections in hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the use of surveillance cultures (SCs) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in asymptomatic hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: In 2011-2012, we conducted a prospective study of HD patients with tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (TCCs). Colonization of the catheter lumen was assessed every 15 days by inoculating ~5 mL endoluminal blood into aerobic culture bottles. Individual patients were triaged based on SC results: group 1 (negative); group 2 (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus [CoNS] with time-to-positivity (TTP) >14 hours); group 3 (CoNS with TTP ≤14 hours); and group 4 (any microorganism other than CoNS and any TTP). RESULTS: We studied 104 patients (129 TCCs). Median follow-up was 262.5 days (interquartile range [IR], 135.0-365.0). A total of 1,734 SCs were collected (median, 18 per patient; IR, 10.0-24.0), of which 1,634 (94.2%) were negative (group 1) and 100 (5.8%) were positive (group 2: 79; group 3: 12, group 4: 9). In groups 2 and 3, 19 TCCs required antibiotic lock therapy (ALT). In group 4, all patients received intravenous therapy and ALT. Under this protocol, there were 0.27 episodes of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days compared with 1.65 (P < .001) prior to its implementation. CONCLUSION: SCs based on easily accessible samples proved useful in triaging HD patients at a high risk of infection.

Effect of acetate-free biofiltration with a potassium-profiled dialysate on the control of cardiac arrhythmias in patients at risk: a pilot study.

Cardiac arrhythmias are a frequent event in chronic hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acetate-free hemofiltration with potassium-profiled dialysate (AFB-K) dialysis compared with constant potassium acetate-free biofiltration (AFB). Twelve patients (mean age 79 years) affected by cardiac arrhythmias or at a high risk for arrhythmia (advanced age, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, heart valve disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) participated in a single-center, sequential cohort study. All were treated with hemodialysis 3 times per week, using constant potassium AFB for the first 3 weeks, followed by an AFB-K dialysate for the subsequent 3 weeks. The hemofilter, duration of dialysis, and electrolyte concentration were the same in both treatments. Both AFB-K and constant potassium AFB dialytic techniques were safe and well tolerated. The results of biochemical tests were similar, except for serum potassium levels after 2 hr of dialysis, which were significantly higher in the AFB-K group (4.0 mmol/L) than in the constant potassium AFB group (3.6 mmol/L) (p<0.001). All cardiac variables improved during AFB-K dialysis. There was a significant reduction of postdialysis QT intervals corrected for heart rate in the AFB-K group (448.8 ms) compared with the constant potassium AFB group (456.8 ms) (p=0.039). The severity and mean number of ventricular extasystoles also decreased (163.5 vs. 444.5/24 hr). Potassium profiling during hemodialysis treatment may be beneficial for patients with arrhythmias or at those risk of arrhythmias, particularly those with predialysis hyperkalemia.

Use of pure bicarbonate-buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid reduces the incidence of CAPD peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: Advances in bag connection technology have reduced the incidence of peritonitis in CAPD patients but there is little information on the effect of the new peritoneal dialysis fluids. METHODS: We studied the incidence of CAPD peritonitis for about 3 years in 100 incident patients--50 patients dialysed with lactate-buffered solution, pH 5.5 and containing glucose degradation products (GDP) (lactate group), and 50 patients with pure bicarbonate-buffered solution, pH 7.4 and low GDP (bicarbonate group). Patients in both groups were similar in age, sex, length of time on CAPD, connection technology and handling of dialysis. RESULTS: In the lactate group, 74 episodes of peritonitis were recorded compared with 43 in the bicarbonate group, i.e. one episode per 21 patient-months with the lactate dialysis fluid and one episode per 36 patient-months with the bicarbonate dialysis fluid (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91, P = 0.017). A total of 3369 exchanges per episode of peritonitis were recorded for bicarbonate compared with 2004 exchanges per episode of peritonitis in the lactate group. The majority of organisms isolated in both groups were Gram-positive bacteria, with a predominance of the oropharyngeal and cutaneous endogenous flora. Three episodes of fungal peritonitis occurred in the lactate group and none in the bicarbonate group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the pure bicarbonate-buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid appears to reduce the frequency of peritonitis in CAPD patients possibly in relation to greater biocompatibility and maintenance of peritoneal membrane structural integrity. Similar results can probably relate to all low-GDP solutions.

Role of prostacyclin (epoprostenol) as anticoagulant in continuous renal replacement therapies: efficacy, security and cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heparin remains the drug most commonly used for anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs). However, in patients with hypercoagulability, heparin is insufficient or, in cases with an increased risk of bleeding or thrombocytopenia, it may be contraindicated. Epoprostenol, a potent vasodilator, antithrombotic and antiplatelet agent, could be an alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the records of patients treated under continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in an academic tertiary hospital of 900 beds, between January 2000 and June 2003. Epoprostenol was prescribed to patients with (i) filter hypercoagulability, defined as consumption of 2 or more filters in the last 24 hours; (ii) low platelet count; or (iii) recent severe hemorrhage. RESULTS: Thirty-eight out of 248 (15%) patients who were under CRRT received epoprostenol for more than 72 hours. Epoprostenol was indicated due to filter hypercoagulability in 48%, thrombocytopenia in 68% (7 patients both) and hemorrhage in 3% of cases. The overall time for epoprostenol therapy was 9,749 hours. The mean filter duration previous to epoprostenol was 23 +/- 12 hours and after administering this drug 38.2 +/- 11.9 hours (p = 0.0001). In 6 patients, heparin and epoprostenol were simultaneously administered. The adverse effects were hemorrhage, which presented in 7 patients (18%) and a fall in blood pressure in another 7 (18%), which recovered in the next 24 hour after starting treatment. Cost analysis demonstrates some advantage with epoprostenol in patients with increased tendency to clotting. CONCLUSIONS: Epoprostenol may be safely used to prevent clotting of the extracorporeal circuits, either alone in patients with thrombocytopenia and/or increased risk of bleeding, or in combination with heparin in states of hypercoagulability.