Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 185(5): 607-615, 2021 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34379604

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral NT formulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A lipid-based formulation of native testosterone filled into soft-gelatin capsules at 40 mg per capsule was designed with 2 years of stability at ambient temperature. Pharmacokinetic comparison studies of this oral lipidic NT formulation to oral TU were conducted in dogs and hypogonadal men. RESULTS: In dogs, 40 mg NT was well absorbed under fasted conditions whereas 40 mg TU required a high-fat meal: for NT, the mean fed/fasted AUC ratio was 1.63 and for TU 7.05. In hypogonadal men, fed and fasted NT had similar pharmacokinetics: Cmax mean 26.5 vs 30.4 nmol/L (769 vs 882 ng/dL), AUC0-10 h 87 vs 88.6 h nmol/L. NT (fed state) showed a testosterone AUC increase of 45% between 120 and 200 mg, and NT 200 mg gave a similar mean AUC0-10 h to TU 80 mg: 87 vs 64.8 h nmol/L. Serum TU levels were variable and on a molar basis were ~ten-fold higher than serum testosterone levels after TU 80 mg fed. The DHT: testosterone AUC0-10 h ratio was more physiological for NT than TU being 0.19 vs 0.36. There were no emerging safety concerns with NT. CONCLUSION: This novel oral lipidic native testosterone formulation has potential advantages over oral TU of dosing independently of food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. Significance statement There is no licensed oral testosterone because of challenges in formulation, and the oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate, require a fatty meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone levels. We have overcome the design challenges and formulated an oral native testosterone that can be taken with or without food and provides physiological levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in hypogonadal men. This formulation, DITEST, has the potential advantage of being oral for patients who do not tolerate injections and less risk of adverse events that might theoretically be associated with elevated dihydrotestosterone levels. Future studies will need to define the dosing regimen for replacement in hypogonadal men.


Subject(s)
Food-Drug Interactions , Lipids/chemistry , Testosterone/administration & dosage , Testosterone/chemistry , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Area Under Curve , Dietary Fats , Dogs , Drug Compounding , Female , Food , Humans , Hypogonadism/drug therapy , Hypogonadism/metabolism , Intestinal Absorption , Male , Middle Aged , Testosterone/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
2.
J Endocr Soc ; 3(5): 847-856, 2019 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30993254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immediate-release hydrocortisone granules in capsules for opening in pediatric-appropriate doses have recently been licensed for children with adrenal insufficiency. This study evaluated the bioavailability of hydrocortisone granules administered as sprinkles onto soft food and yogurt compared with direct administration to the back of the tongue. METHODS: Randomized, 3-period crossover study in 18 dexamethasone-suppressed healthy men. In each period, the fasted participants received 5 mg hydrocortisone granules either directly to the back of the tongue or sprinkled onto soft food (applesauce), or yogurt, followed by 240 mL of water. Serum cortisol was measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectometry. RESULTS: The cortisol geometric mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) for direct administration, sprinkles onto yogurt, and sprinkles onto soft food were: Cmax 428, 426, 427 nmol/L and AUC0-inf 859, 886, 844 h × nmol/L, and AUC0-t 853, 882, 838 h × nmol/L respectively. The 90% CI for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-inf and AUC0-t for administration with soft food or yogurt to direct administration were well within the bioequivalent range, 80% to 125%. Median time to Cmax (Tmax) was similar between methods of administration: 0.63 hours administered directly, 0.75 hours on soft food and 0.75 hours on yogurt. No adverse events occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocortisone granules administered as sprinkles onto soft food or yogurt but not mixed with these foods are bioequivalent to those administered directly to the back of the tongue. Carers, parents, or patients may choose to administer hydrocortisone granules either directly or sprinkled onto soft food or yogurt.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...