ABSTRACT
Objective The endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (EEO) is emerging as a feasible surgical alternative to conventional microscopic transoral approach. In this article, we show EEO in the basilar invagination (BI) and describe in detail the technical aspects, advantages, and disadvantages of this approach ( Fig. 1 ). Methods We describe EEO using audiovisual material from the neurosurgical department of Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia database. Results We present the case of a 61-year-old male patient with BI. Initially, we performed suboccipital decompression and occipitocervical fusion. Subsequently, after a no significant neurological improvement and persistent anterior compression, EEO was performed. The postoperative evolution was uneventful and the preoperative neurological deficits were recovered rapidly after surgery Discussion EEO technique enables complete odontoid resection, preventing invasion of aggressive oral bacterial flora, and it is not limited by the mouth opening. As well, it avoids manipulation of the soft palate, therefore evades the risk of velopalatal insufficiency, facilitates immediate oral tolerance, and early extubation. The rostral position of C1-C2 complex in BI could suppose a great advantage in favor the endonasal approaches. Mucoperichondrial vascularized flaps could be obtained to avoid a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and facilitate the reepithelization process of the surgical bed. Conclusion EEO may provide a significant anatomic and technical advantage over the trans-oral approach. The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/Td6MDcjCNKk .
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to study the outcome of patients who underwent cranioplasty with cryopreserved autologous bone after decompressive craniectomy. METHODS: Data from 74 patients were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into groups according to the storage time and the age at cranioplasty. To assess the predictive potential for complication, factors were related to successive stages (preoperative, craniectomy, tissue processing, cranioplasty, and postoperative). Cooling and warming rates applied on bone flap were calculated. The ability to inhibit microbial growth was determined exposing bone fragments to a panel of microorganisms. The concentration of antibiotics eluted from the bone was also determined. A bone explant culture method was used to detect living cells in the thawed cranial bone. RESULTS: Hydrocephalus was significantly more frequent in pediatric patients (26.7%) than in adults (5.1%). The overall rate of bone flap resorption was 21.6% (43.7% of which required reoperation). Surgical site infection after cranioplasty was detected in 6.8% of patients. There was no correlation between infection as a postoperative complication and previous microbiological-positive culture during processing. The cause of craniectomy did not influence the risk of bone flap contamination. Vancomycin was the only antibiotic detected in the supernatant where the bone was incubated. Outgrowth from bone explants was observed in 36.8% of thawed skulls. An early start of bone flap processing at the tissue bank had a positive effect on cell viability. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome after autologous cranioplasty is a multifactorial process, which is modulated by patient-related, surgery-related, and bone-related factors.
