Micro-Mechanical Investigation of Interfacial Debonding in Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composites Using Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) Approach.

The interface debonding in carbon fiber-reinforced polymers is analyzed and evaluated using the extended finite element method (XFEM). In order to accurately evaluate the bonding properties between fibers and matrix, different tests were carried out, including the multiple tests for different orientations to study longitudinal, transversal, and shear properties of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Extensive experimentation has been performed in all the different groups and categories with different dimensions and parameters in order to ascertain the values of strength and the prediction of the damage to the structure. The experimental and numerical comparison provided significant trends and data to evaluate the mechanical properties of the interface. The values of stiffness and strength are compared and validated. Development of Representative Volume Element (RVE) for progressive damage model to these damage phenomena has already been performed as a feasibility study for the model, though it is not included in this particular paper. The results of this research for all the experimental and numerical sets can serve as reliable data in the microsimulation of devices and sensitive parameters that include carbon fiber-reinforced light metal matrix composites and makes a better investigative model that contributes to various conditions. It further offers an investigation of the microscopic deformation mechanisms in the composites.

Reviving a ghost in the history of technology: the social construction of the recumbent bicycle.

Recumbent bicycles have never truly been associated with international cycling. Conventional safety (upright) bicycles have long been at the center of the cycling world, for both sport and transportation. This is despite the fact that recumbent bicycles are faster, more comfortable, and more efficient than the upright bicycles. The aim of this article is to explain the historical and social perspectives that led to the rejection of the recumbent bicycle by utilizing the theory of Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Bijker's two power theory, providing a contrast with the adoption of the safety bicycle.