ABSTRACT
Background Acne vulgaris (AV) is a common multifactorial disorder affecting the pilosebaceous units. Research has shown that inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AV, including both inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne. Several studies have linked proinflammatory cytokines to AV; however, only a few have explored the correlation between interleukin-19 (IL-19) and AV. Our aim is to estimate the level of IL-19 in patients with AV compared to matched controls and to investigate the role of IL-19 in the pathogenesis of acne. Materials and methods This prospective cross-sectional case and control study includes 80 patients and 40 matched controls. Patients were divided into mild (20), moderate (40), and severe (20) groups based on their global acne score severity index. Detailed history and complete general and dermatological examinations were taken from each patient. Furthermore, 5 ml of blood was taken from all participants to assess the level of IL-19. Results IL-19 levels were significantly higher in patients with AV compared to matched controls. Furthermore, IL-19 concentrations were found to be proportional to the severity of acne, with the highest levels detected in patients with severe AV (p-value <0.005). Conclusion IL-19 levels in AV were significantly higher than in matched control. The difference was proportional to its severity. This might indicate IL-19 as an inflammatory marker and could potentially be related to AV.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the outbreak of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq that started in 2015, the course of the disease and the treatment were not consistent with the available literature. Physicians, particularly dermatologists, faced challenges with treating the cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions with high rates of treatment failure and resistance to treatment. We used Q-methodology to understand the range and diversities of opinions and the practical experiences of dermatologists about the treatment difficulties of cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS: This Q-methodology study was carried out in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, and involved 37 dermatologists. A set of 40 statements related to different aspects of difficulties and uncertainties of treating cutaneous leishmaniasis was prepared. The dermatologists were requested to distribute the 40 statements into a scaled grid of nine piles from least agree to most agree. We applied by-person factor analysis using PQMethod 2.35 for the data analysis. RESULTS: The analysis revealed two different viewpoints about the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis and a consensus viewpoint. The first viewpoint emphasized the use of sodium stibogluconate-based combination therapy, concerns with treatment failure, and lack of compliance with the treatment. The second viewpoint emphasized the lack of standard treatment and advances in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. There was a consensus between both groups of respondents about many aspects of the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, including considering sodium stibogluconate the first drug of choice for cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a diversity of viewpoints and uncertainties about the effectiveness of the available treatment modalities and treatment difficulties and failure. Interrupted supply and poor quality of the available drugs and lack of a standard and advanced treatment are the main problems facing the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. More research is required to determine the best treatment modalities for the different types of cutaneous leishmaniasis. There is a need for the development of treatment guidelines specific to the Iraqi context with a particular focus on the treatment of the resistant and atypical cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
