ABSTRACT
O presente estudo tem por objetivo realizar um relato de experiência demonstrando a percepção de discentes do curso de odontologia na sua participação na prática da atenção primária à saúde (APS), vivenciadas em um cenário pandêmico e com base no combate a enfrentamentos e desafios impostos no processo de trabalho das equipes de saúde da família. Este estudo trata - se de relato de experiência, de caráter descritivo e retrospectivo, associado à uma pesquisa bibliográfica para que trousse o embasamento teórico necessário para a descrição do relato de experiência vivenciado. No decorrer da pandemia, a Equipe de saúde da família exerceu importante papel e atuou na linha de prevenção e controle desta, sendo uma das maiores ferramentas de apoio. Na odontologia, a atuação da equipe de saúde bucal devido a fatores de risco inerentes à esta modalidade de ocupação, ficou limitada em seu exercício. O conhecimento de muitos dos profissionais da rede pública foi colocado em questão, assim como sua vivência, limitações e o medo de contrair a doença. Os profissionais da equipe de saúde, mostraram que o trabalho interprofissional e um bom relacionamento aumentou o incentivo e a responsabilidade de equipe.
This study aims to carry out an experience report demonstrating the perception of students of the dentistry course in their participation in the practice of primary health care (PHC), experienced in a pandemic scenario and based on the fight against confrontations and challenges imposed on the work process of family health teams. This study is an experience report, descriptive and retrospective, associated with bibliographical research to bring the necessary theoretical basis for the description of the lived experience report. During the pandemic, the Family Health Team played an important role and acted in the line of prevention and control of this, being one of the greatest support tools. In dentistry, the performance of the oral health team, due to risk factors inherent to this type of occupation, was limited in its exercise. The knowledge of many public health professionals was questioned, as well as their experience, limitations and fear of contracting the disease. Health team professionals showed that interprofessional work and a good relationship increased team incentive and responsibility.
Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Health Care , Students, Dental , Pandemics , COVID-19 , Working ConditionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic characteristics of decrementally conducting accessory pathways (APs) are well described; however, little is known about decrementally conducting APs caused by the radiofrequency ablation of a rapidly conducting AP. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiologic characteristics of 6 patients who developed a decremental AP after an attempt at ablation. METHODS: We compared the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of 295 consecutive patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who underwent radiofrequency ablation of 311 manifest APs (group A) with those of 6 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in whom a decrementally conducting AP was detected after an attempt at ablation. RESULTS: The AP ablation site in group B patients was at the coronary sinus ostium region in 3 patients, middle cardiac vein in 2 patients, and left posteroseptal region in 1 patient. Sixty-two bypass tracts in group A patients and all 6 in group B patients were ablated at these locations, while 249 bypass tracts in group A patients and none in group B patients were ablated elsewhere (P = .0001). Five of the 6 patients (83%) with acquired Mahaim physiology had an AP located in the venous system. The odds for developing an acquired decremental antegrade atrioventricular AP when it was located inside the venous system were 1 in 6. All group B decremental APs were sensitive to adenosine, but none in 85 group A patients (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for developing decremental conduction after the ablation of a rapidly conducting AP is greater for APs inside the coronary venous system. Acquired decremental antegrade atrioventricular APs are electrophysiologically similar to de novo ones. They are capable of being part of an arrhythmia circuit and, therefore, should be targeted for ablation.
Subject(s)
Accessory Atrioventricular Bundle/physiopathology , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Electrocardiography/methods , Electrophysiological Phenomena/physiology , Pre-Excitation, Mahaim-Type/etiology , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Pre-Excitation, Mahaim-Type/diagnosis , Pre-Excitation, Mahaim-Type/physiopathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ECG, clinical, and electrophysiologic profiles of patients with a fasciculoventricular pathway are well described. Fasciculoventricular pathways occurring in the setting of glycogen storage cardiomyopathy possess unique features. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, ECG, and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients with a fasciculoventricular pathway, with or without glycogen storage cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Two groups of patients with a fasciculoventricular pathway were compared: group A consisted of 10 patients with the PRKAG2 mutation (Arg302gln), and group B consisted of 9 patients without the mutation. RESULTS: Thirty percent of group A patients had left ventricular hypertrophy, and none had an additional accessory pathway. Group B patients had no structural heart disease, and 33% had an additional accessory pathway. Group A patients had a slower resting heart rate (56 ± 7 vs 75 ± 10 bpm, P <0.0001), a wider QRS complex (0.15 ± 0.01 vs 0.11 ± 0.02 ms, P = .0004), and a longer HV interval (34 ± 1 vs 25 ± 3 ms, P = .0003). During long-term follow-up, 50% of group A patients developed complete AV block versus none in group B. Eighty percent of group A patients developed atrial flutter and/or atrial fibrillation. No Group B patient had any arrhythmia during follow-up after successful ablation of additional arrhythmia circuits. No sustained ventricular arrhythmia was induced in any patient from either group. CONCLUSION: Patients with a fasciculoventricular pathway associated with the PRKAG2 mutation have distinct clinical, ECG, and electrophysiologic profiles and should be correctly identified because of their ominous long-term prognosis. Patients without the mutation have an excellent arrhythmia-free prognosis after treatment of additional circuits.