Radiation therapy of optico-hypothalamic gliomas (OHG)--radiographic response, vision and late toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Management strategies for optic pathway gliomas include observation, surgery, irradiation, chemotherapy and a combination of these modalities. It has been the policy of our University Hospital to consider radiation as the standard treatment for progressive optic pathway gliomas. This report describes the clinical presentation, treatment patterns and outcome with special emphasis on the long term functional status of patients with optico-hypothalamic gliomas (OHG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1975 and 1997, 25 patients with OHG were treated by radiation therapy (RT) following surgery or biopsy. All patients received a local RT with a 0.5-1 cm margin around the lesions as depicted on CT or MRI scans. Age adjusted radiation doses ranged from 45 to 60 Gy with a single fraction size of 1.6-2 Gy. Endpoints of the study were: radiographic response, survival, progression-free survival and time to endocrinologic toxicity as well as the visual function during follow-up. The median follow-up time was 9 years (range, 1.5-23 years). RESULTS: A partial response was noted in six (24%) of the patients, 13 (52%) patients had a stable tumour throughout the observation period and six (24%) patients had a tumour progression. Overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 94 and 69% at 10 years, respectively. A significant influence on progression-free survival was noted for age at diagnosis (P=0.04) and total dose (P=0.05). Nine out of 13 (69%) patients aged below 10 years compared with 3/12 (25%) patients aged above 10 years experienced hypothalamic-pituitary deficiency (P=0.008) during follow-up. As for visual acuity, nine patients had an improvement, another 13 patients a stable situation and three patients a measurable deterioration. Visual field deficits improved in three, remained unchanged in 16 patients and worsened in only one patient. CONCLUSION: Postoperative RT with a total dose above 45 Gy should be considered as standard treatment in OHG with documented progression. Close radiographic monitoring and lifelong yearly evaluation for the need of possible hormone replacement are strongly recommended.

Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized multicenter study.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneously administered chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III/IV head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer were treated either with RT alone (arm A) or simultaneous RT plus CT (RCT; arm B). RT was identical in both arms and administered in three courses with 13 fractions of 1.8 Gy each twice daily. During one course, from day 3 to 11, 23.4 Gy was delivered. In arm B, cisplatin (CDDP) 60 mg/m2, fluorouracil (5-FU) 350 mg/m2 by intravenous (i.v.) bolus, and leucovorin (LV) 50 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus were given on day 2, and 5-FU 350 mg/m2/24 hour by continuous infusion and LV 100 mg/m2/24 hours by continuous infusion were given from day 2 to 5. Treatment was repeated on days 22 and 44; a total RT dose of 70.2 Gy was administered. Treatment breaks were scheduled from days 12 to 21 and days 34 to 43. RESULTS: From 1989 to 1993, 298 patients were enrolled and 270 patients were assessable. Acute mucositis grade 3 or 4 was more frequent in arm B (38%) than in arm A (16%) (P < .001). Total treatment time was significantly longer in arm B than in arm A (P < .001) due to prolonged breaks. According to hematologic toxicity, scheduled drug doses were given in 74% of patients for the second course and 46% for the third course. The 3-year overall survival rate was 24% in arm A and 48% in arm B (P < .0003). The 3-year locoregional control rate was 17% in arm A and 36% in arm B (P < .004). Both arms showed similar distant failure patterns (arm A, 13 of 140; arm B, 12 of 130). Serious late side effects were not significantly different between treatment arms (arm A, 6.4%; arm B, 10%; not significant). CONCLUSION: Concomitant CT offered improved disease control and survival in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Due to increased acute toxicity, more supportive care is demanded when CT is given simultaneously. Increased total treatment time does not exert a negative impact on outcome in this combined modality regimen.