ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Pararectus approach has been introduced as an alternative anterior approach to the Stoppa approach in acetabular surgery. There is no evidence which approach should be preferred, especially regarding approach-related complications. Therefore, aim of this registry study was to compare the Pararectus approach to the Stoppa approach regarding complications and quality of reduction. METHODS: Patients from the German Pelvic Registry with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, either through the Pararectus approach or the Stoppa approach, were analyzed or compared regarding demographic, clinical and operative parameters. RESULTS: In total, 384 patients with an acetabular fracture received a surgical procedure with either the Pararectus approach (n=120) or the Stoppa approach (n=264). There were no differences between the two groups regarding demographic parameters and fracture pattern. The overall complication rate (35.0% vs. 31.4%), the mortality rate (5.0% vs. 3.0%) and the osteosynthesis-associated complication rate (5.8% vs. 4.2%) tended to be higher in the Pararectus group with no statistical significance. There were significantly more anatomical reductions in the Pararectus group (56% vs. 43%; p=0.01). However, operation time was significantly longer in the Pararectus group (255±125 vs. 205±103 minutes; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite a longer operation time, the Pararectus approach and the Stoppa approach are equivalently applicable for the treatment of acetabular fractures regarding complication rates and quality of reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.
