External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device : cross-over simulation study.

BACKGROUND: External chest compressions (ECC) are essential components of resuscitation and are usually performed without any adjuncts in professional healthcare. Even for healthcare professionals during in-hospital and out-of-hospital resuscitation poor performance in ECC has been reported in recent years. Although several stand-alone devices have been developed none has been implemented as a standard in patient care. The aim of this study was to examine if the use of a mechanical device providing visual feedback and audible assistance during ECC improves performance of healthcare professionals following minimal and simplified instructions. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized cross-over study 81 healthcare professionals performed ECC for 3 min (in the assumed setting of a secured airway) twice on a manikin (Skillreporter ResusciAnne®, with PC-Skillreporting System Version 1.3.0, Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) in a mock cardiac arrest scenario. Group 1 (n=40) performed ECC with the device first followed by classic ECC and group 2 (n=41) in the opposite order. Minimal instructions were standardized and provided by video instruction (1 min 38 s). Endpoints were achievement of a mean compression rate between 90 and 110/min and a mean compression depth of 40-50 mm. In addition participants had to answer questionnaires about demographic data, professional experience and recent recommendations for ECC as well as their impression of the device concerning the ease of use and their personal level of confidence. Data were analyzed for group-related and inter-group differences using SAS (Version 9.1.3, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: A total of 81 healthcare professionals regularly involved in resuscitation attempts in pre-hospital or in-hospital settings took part in the study with no differences between the groups: females 35.8% (n=52), emergency medical technicians 32.1% (n=26), anesthesia nurses 32.1% (n=26), physicians (anesthesiology) 45% (n=29). In group 1 33 out of 40 (82.5%; 99.7±4.82/min; 95% confidence interval 95% CI: 98.1-101.2/min) reached the correct range for compression rate and 29/40 (72.5%; 44.0±4.95 mm; 95% CI: 42.4-45.6 mm) the correct compression depth using the assisting device. Afterwards they conducted classic ECC without the device and deteriorated significantly: correct compression rate was achieved by 12/40 (30%, p≤0.0001; 110.6±11.0/min (95% CI: 107.1-114.1/min), while 25/40 (62.5%; 44.5±5.63 mm; 95% CI: 42.6-46.3 mm) met the correct compression depth. Group 2 performed poorer in ECC without assistance and 5/41 (12.2%; 104.5±21.35/min; 95% CI: 97.8-111.3/min) reached the correct rate whereas 21/41 (51.2%; 39.6±7.61 mm; 95% CI: 37.2-42.0 mm) compressed to the appropriate depth. Using the device there was a significant improvement in the second evaluation with 34/41 (82.9%, p≤0.0001; 101.7±4.68/min; 95% CI: 100.2-103.2/min) reaching the correct rate and 36/41 (87.8%, p≤0.0001; 43.9±4.16 mm; 95% CI: 42.6-45.2 mm) the correct depth. CONCLUSIONS: The tested device is easy to use after instruction of less than 3 min and improves ECC performance of healthcare professionals in simulated cardiac arrest with respect to compression depth as well as compression rate.

[Emergency mission documentation in simulated care. Video-based error analysis]. / Notärztliche Einsatzdokumentation in der Simulation. Videobasierte Fehleranalyse.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine documentation quality in physician staffed emergency medical services (EMS). This study compared simulated on-site care with the associated patient records written by EMS physicians. METHODS: For this study two standardized simulated case scenarios, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and major trauma with traumatic brain injury were designed by an expert committee. Overall 29 EMS teams each consisting of 1 EMS physician and 2 paramedics ran through the scenarios on high fidelity patient simulators and each scenario was videotaped. The scenarios were stopped after 12 min for STEMI and after 14 min for major trauma independent of the actions carried out and each EMS physician then had 10 min to document this initial phase on standardized protocol sheets. The videotaped scenarios were analyzed by two independent investigators. Documentation of predefined contents and all drug dosages were checked against the simulated on-site care. The data were evaluated and classified as correct, incorrect or missing documentation although action performed. RESULTS: Written consent for data analysis was provided by 28 teams. Overall 20 parameters and actions in the STEMI scenario and 16 in the major trauma scenario as well as all drug dosages were evaluated. For the scenario STEMI 469 actions were analyzed of which 271 (58%) were correct, 94 (20%) incorrect and 104 (22%) had missing documentation. A total of 140 medications were administered of which 31 (22%) were documented incorrectly and 14 (10%) were not documented. For major trauma 401 actions were analyzed of which 244 (61%) were correct, 101 (25%) incorrect and 56 (14%) had missing documentation. In this scenario the teams administered 138 medications of which 31 (22%) were documented incorrectly and 16 (12%) were not documented. Infused amounts of crystalloids and colloids were mostly documented correctly in this case (35 correct /6 incorrect/8 not documented). Documentation of several clinical parameters was carried out predominantly correctly, e.g. initial blood pressure (STEMI: 25/2/1, major trauma: 21/4/2) and initial ECG rhythm (STEMI: 27/0/1, major trauma: 26/0/1). Documentation of other clinically relevant parameters was often performed incorrectly: 12-lead ECG in STEMI (5/9/12) and capnometry in major trauma (9/4/7). No team used a pain scale to assess the level of pain in the STEMI scenario but 12 EMS physicians documented an accordant value (numerical rating scale) on the patient records. Furthermore some parameters could be identified where documentation was mostly missing although they were measured, e.g. onset of symptoms in STEMI (5/4/15) and reduced level of consciousness and bradypnea in major trauma (9/2/17). CONCLUSION: Patient safety can be reduced if relevant preclinical data are not transmitted correctly to the admitting hospital. Therefore there is a need to improve documentation quality in EMS. Electronic documentation, training of EMS staff and quality management programs might offer solutions. Because of the small sample size further studies are needed to evaluate the validity of these results.

[Stocked medications in emergency physician-based medical services in Germany. Reality and requirements according to guidelines]. / Vorgehaltene Medikamente auf notarztbesetzten Rettungsmitteln in Deutschland. Realität und Erfordernis nach Leitlinien.

BACKGROUND: The emergency medical service (EMS) should work according to criteria of evidence-based medicine. In Germany the EMS of each state is under the control of at least one medical supervisor known as emergency medical directors (EMD) and most states have several different EMDs responsible for one or more provinces of the state. The German Medical Association advises these supervisors to specify the pharmacological resources in store for use in physician powered EMSs. This study examines the pharmacological resources in EMSs which is provided by the EMDs in Germany. Furthermore, a comparison of the inventory analysis of stored drugs was carried out with the requirements according to guidelines for selected tracer diagnoses. METHOD: In the period of May 2008 to January 2009 a total of 148 EMDs were contacted and asked to supply drug storage lists for emergency physician-staffed rescue vehicles in their respective jurisdiction. The addresses of all EMDs who could be identified by the federal office of the National Association of Emergency Medical Director, Germany were used over the period. The evaluation was conducted anonymously. The tracer diagnoses "cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "acute coronary syndrome", "status generalized tonic-clonic seizure," "severe asthma attack", "acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", "supraventricular tachycardia", "severe brain trauma" and "acute heart failure with signs of hypoperfusion" were selected. Current and established guidelines have been identified with the homepage of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany and supported by the leading European and International guidelines. RESULTS: The corresponding lists were returned by 95 different emergency service areas (response rate 64.2%). With a total of 39 groups of substances 142 different drugs could be identified, an average of 54±9.6 and median 55 (range 31-77). Listed are agents giving the provision in percent, for which the comparison with guidelines for tracer diagnoses could show deficits: sodium bicarbonate 75.8%, calcium 50.5%, magnesium 45.3%, noradrenaline 65.3%, adenosine 58.9%, dobutamine 57.9%, lorazepam iv 13.7%, salbutamol 41.1%, ipratropium bromide 13.7% (the last two as liquid preparations for inhalation). With a frequency of about 30-80%, depending on the respective tracer diagnosis, no medical emergency treatment according to the highest level of evidence is possible. CONCLUSION: Due to recent treatment recommendations provision with sodium bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, noradrenaline, adenosine, lorazepam iv, dobutamine and as well with ipratropium bromide and salbutamol (both as liquid preparations for inhalation) should be improved. For the future, a federal uniform minimum standard due to evidence-based principles is desirable.

Comparison of early cognitive function and recovery after desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia in the elderly: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is being recognized as a complication contributing to perioperative morbidity and mortality of the elderly. We hypothesized that the use of the shorter-acting volatile anaesthetic desflurane would be associated with less incidence of POCD when compared with sevoflurane. METHODS: Approved by the local ethical committee, 80 patients (aged 65-75 yr) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were allocated to either the desflurane (n=40) or the sevoflurane (n=40) group. The primary outcome was the cognitive Test for Attentional Performance with its subtests Alertness, Divided Attention, Visual Scanning, Working Memory, and Reaction Change. In addition, Paper-Pencil Tests [Well-being Test BF-S, Recall of Digit Span (DST), Digit-Symbol-Substitution Test, Trail Making Tests A and B, and Spielberg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory] were measured. After baseline assessment 12-24 h before operation, patients were followed up 6-8 and 66-72 h after operation. Among other outcome parameters, emergence times from anaesthesia and modified Aldrete scores were recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of POCD. However, according to the Paper-Pencil Tests, significant improvements for the desflurane group could be detected (Well-being Test at 6-8 h, DST at 6-8 h, and Trail Making Test at 66-72 h). Emergence was significantly faster in the desflurane group for 'time to open eyes' and 'time to extubation'. CONCLUSIONS: The total incidence of POCD showed no differences between the desflurane and the sevoflurane groups. However, the tests Well-being scale, DST, and Trail Making Test, emergence times, and patients' satisfaction were in favour of desflurane.

[E-health in emergency medicine - the research project Med-on-@ix]. / "E-Health" in der Notfallmedizin - das Forschungsprojekt Med-on-@ix.

There is a need for new strategies to face current and future problems in German Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Lack of quality management and increasing costs in the presence of a deficit of EMS physicians are typical challenges, resulting in an increasing deficit in medical care. In addition, information and communication technology used in German EMS is out of date. The physician-powered EMS has to be modernized to increase quality and show measurable evidence of its effectiveness. Otherwise its future existence is at serious risk. Therefore, the project Med-on-@ix was created by the Department of Anaesthesiology at the University Hospital Aachen, Germany. The aim was to develop a new emergency telemedicine service system and to implement it clinically in order to advance medical care and effectiveness in the EMS by process optimization of each scene call. This system offers EMS physicians and paramedics an additional consultation by a specialised centre of competence, thus assuring medical therapy according to evidence-based guidelines. Several prospective studies are conducted to analyse this system in comparison to the conventional EMS.

[Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation under special circumstances: part 2]. / Erweiterte kardiopulmonale Reanimation in besonderen Situationen: Teil 2.

Based on the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), guidelines were published for managing basic and advanced life-saving procedures in the event of cardiac arrest. The fact that special circumstances for cardiac arrest must be considered resulted in a separate chapter. This two-part article reviews essential information as well as necessary modifications of the standard advanced life support algorithm in cases of electrolyte disorders, hyperthermia and hypothermia, cardiac arrest in pregnancy, trauma, electrical emergencies and cardiac surgery. Part 1 has already dealt with life-threatening drowning, asthma, anaphylaxis and poisoning.

[Advanced life support under special circumstances: part 1]. / Erweiterte kardiopulmonale Reanimation in besonderen Situationen: Teil 1.

Based on the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), guidelines were published for managing basic and advanced life-saving procedures in the event of cardiac arrest. The fact that special circumstances sometimes must be considered in patient treatment resulted in a separate chapter. This first part of a two-part article reviews essential information as well as necessary modifications of the standard advanced life support algorithm in cases of life-threatening drowning, asthma, anaphylaxis, and poisoning. The second part will deal with electrolyte disorders, hypothermia, electrical emergencies, trauma, cardiac arrest during pregnancy, and cardiac surgery.