ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess Hyoid bone position and retrolingual airway space after Modified Genioglossus Advancement Surgery by cephalometry in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Zagazig University Hospital. METHODS: Eighteen patients with moderate to severe OSA having multilevel airway obstruction confirmed by fiberoptic endoscopy during Muller's maneuver and DISE. All patients underwent modified genioglossus advancement surgery associated with antrolateral advancement pharyngoplasty. Beside Polysomnography and Drug induced sleep endoscopy, Cephalometry was done preoperatively and 6 months postoperative. RESULTS: Improved Polysomnography parameters as Postoperative mean ± SD apnea hypopnea index decreased from 52 ± 17.1 to 17 ± 3 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 27.71 to 42.41). LOS increased from 79.89 ± 4.43% to 83 ± 4.05% (P 0.07, 95% confidence interval -0.31 to 6.97). Cephalometry analysis showed a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative findings, including: Retrolingual airway space at three levels significantly increased; Level 1 from 6.1 ± 1.6 to 8.5 ± 1.7, Level 2 from 10.5 ± 2.4 to 13.9 ± 2.1, Level 3 from 15.7 ± 3.1 to 21 ± 4, H-GN decreased from 51 ± 7 to 39 ± 8, H-MP decreased from 31.6 ± 7.7 to 24.9 ± 7.3, HS decreased from 121 ± 15 to 102 ± 12, H-PH increased from 29 ± 8 to 43 ± 9. With a success rate defined as AHI <20 and a 50% decrease in AHI of the preoperative value, the surgical success rate was 83.33%. CONCLUSION: This study showed that Modified genioglossus advancement procedures done for OSA patients significantly changed the position of hyoid bone into a more anterior and superior position and this was reflected in the postoperative Polysomnography.
Subject(s)
Hyoid Bone , Cephalometry , Humans , Hyoid Bone/surgery , Polysomnography , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare submental intubation with tracheostomy in patients with maxillofacial fractures who were operated under general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation was contraindicated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective comparative study was conducted on 32 patients undergoing maxillofacial operations. All patients had a panfacial trauma (including naso-ethmoid orbital fracture combined with mandibular fracture). Patients who had unstable cervical vertebra, laryngeal trauma, urgent tracheostomy, and patients with expected prolonged postoperative ventilation were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly assigned to elective tracheostomy and submental intubation groups. The patients were evaluated according to the time required to do elective tracheostomy or submental intubation, the operation comorbidity and complications, and the postoperative scar. RESULTS: The average time required to do submental intubation was 8.35 min versus 30.75 min required to do elective tracheostomy with significant difference (p < 0.0001). No complication was reported with submental intubation while in elective tracheostomy group, surgical emphysema was registered in two patients. The submental scar was acceptable in all patients while the tracheostomy scar needs scar revision in four cases (p = 0.0325). CONCLUSION: Submental endotracheal intubation appeared to be a simple, safe, and significantly faster reliable alternative to tracheostomy during surgical reconstruction of selected cases of maxillofacial fractures without indication for prolonged postoperative ventilation support with significantly lower morbidity.
