Is there any truth in the myth that IVF treatments involve weight gain?

Purpose: To examine body weight change in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) using antagonist protocol after up to three treatment cycles. Methods: A prospective cohort study among IVF patients treated between 2018 and 2019. Each patient underwent weight measurement three times during the treatment cycle: before treatment, at the beginning of the hormonal stimulation, and at the completion of the cycle, on the day of the pregnancy test. Data were also analyzed according to the body mass index (BMI) groups for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients. Finally, weight changes were recorded following altogether 519 treatment cycles, 240, 131, and 148 cycles, for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively. Results: The change in the patient's weight was clinically non-significant either during the waiting period or during gonadotropin administration, and overall, during the first, second, or third treatment cycles. The recorded mean total weight change of 0.26 ± 1.85, 0.4 ± 1.81, and 0.17 ± 1.7, after the first, second, or third treatment cycles, represent a change of 0.36%, 0.56%, and 0.23% of their initial weights, respectively. This change of less than 1% of the body weight falls short of the clinically significant weight gain of 5%-7%. Analyzing the data for the various BMI groups, the changes observed in body weight were under 1%, hence with no clinical significance. Conclusion: The findings of the study reject the myth that hormone therapy involves clinically significant weight gain, and this can lower the concerns of many patients who are candidates for treatment of assisted reproductive technology.

Does day-3 LH/FSH ratio influence in vitro fertilization outcome in PCOS patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with different GnRH-analogue?

In an attempt to evaluate whether high basal day-3 luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone (LH/FSH) ratio affects IVF cycle outcome in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with either GnRH-agonist (n = 47) or antagonist (n = 104), we studied 151 IVF cycles: 119 in patients with basal LH/FSH <2 and 32 in patients with LH/FSH ≥ 2. The PCOS with high LH/FSH ratio achieved a non-significantly higher pregnancy rate using the GnRH-agonist (50% vs 17.9%, p = 0.2; respectively), as compared to the GnRH-antagonist protocols, probably due to the ability of the long GnRH-agonist protocol to induce a prolong and sustained reduction of the high basal LH milieu and avert its detrimental effect on oocyte quality and implantation potential.

Human menopausal gonadotropin versus highly purified-hMG in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in-vitro fertilisation: does purity improve outcome?

OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the effect of the two commercially available menotropins (highly purified-human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) and the traditional human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)) on ovarian stimulation characteristics and in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle outcome. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 36 patients undergoing at least two controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles for IVF, with the same GnRH-analogue protocols, where one included HP-hMG and the other included hMG. Ovarian stimulation characteristics and outcome were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the HP-hMG group achieved significantly higher implantation (20.0% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.03; respectively) and pregnancy rates (47.2% vs. 19.4%, p < 0.009; respectively) compared to the hMG group. Although no in-between group difference was observed in the number of top-quality embryos per patient, the proportion of the total number of top-quality embryos per total number of generated embryos was significantly higher in the HP-hMG group (88/196 vs. 72/204, p < 0.049; respectively) as compared to the hMG group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF that includes HP-hMG preparations produce significantly higher implantation and pregnancy rates, as compared to the traditional hMG.

A combined approach to patients with repeated IVF failures.

In an attempt to evaluate the appropriate approach in patients with repeated IVF failures, we compared the stimulation characteristics of 19 cycles. This includes the combination of diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling during oral contraceptive pill treatment, which precedes the ultrashort GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant protocol to the patients' previous failed IVF attempt. Patients undergoing the combined approach achieved an improved outcome with reasonable implantation and clinical pregnancy rates (25 and 42%, respectively).

Ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: the role of body mass index.

In an attempt to examine whether body mass index (BMI) may influence IVF outcome in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with either gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist (agonist group) or antagonist (antagonist group), 100 IVF cycles were studied: 35 in the agonist and 65 in the antagonist groups. In both agonist and antagonist groups, patients with BMI < or = 25 kg/m(2) had a significantly higher fertilization rate compared with patients with BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). Lean patients (BMI < or = 25) undergoing ovarian stimulation using the GnRH-agonist, demonstrated the highest pregnancy rate. In conclusion, in this series of PCOS patients undergoing IVFembryo transfer cycles, ovarian stimulation utilizing the midluteal long GnRH-agonist suppressive protocol yielded a higher pregnancy rate in lean patients, probably due to its ability to lower the high basal LH milieu and its detrimental effect on oocyte quality and implantation potential.

HMG improves IVF outcome in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio: a preliminary study.

In an attempt to examine the role of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) administration in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio, patients undergoing at least two IVF cycles, where one included HMG (HMG group) and the other included recombinant FSH (rFSH) only (FSH group), were studied. The use of HMG, in this specific group of patients, produced significantly higher number of top-quality embryos (3.9 +/- 3.1 versus 2.5 +/- 1.7, respectively; P < 0.05), higher implantation (27.9% versus 5.3%, respectively; P +/- 0.003) and clinical pregnancy rates (44.4% versus 11.1%, respectively; P < 0.02), as compared with rFSH. Moreover, while the HMG group achieved a significantly higher peak oestradiol concentration (P = 0.04), no differences were observed between the groups in the other ovarian stimulation variables. In conclusion, the use of HMG in patients with high basal FSH/LH ratio, produced significantly higher number of top-quality embryos, and higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, compared with rFSH.

The influence of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether body mass index (BMI) influences the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We studied 516 IVF cycles, 438 undergone by nonobese (BMI < or = 30) and 78 by obese (BMI > 30) women who all had an a priori favorable prognosis (age < 40 years and first, second, or third IVF cycle). RESULTS: Pregnancy was achieved in 122 (27.9%) nonobese and 12 (15.4%) obese women. The obese women required significantly longer stimulation and more gonadotropin ampoules, and had lower peak estradiol levels and a significantly lower fertilization rate; obese poor responders had a significantly lower pregnancy rate than nonobese poor responders; and the prevalence of poor responders was significantly higher among obese than nonobese women (28.2% vs 16.9%, P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: While the likelihood of poor responders was increased among obese women, reasonable conception rates were achieved in nonobese poor responders, and were comparable to the rates in nonobese and obese normal responders.

What is the preferred GnRH analogue for polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization?

In an attempt to evaluate the influence of the GnRH analogue used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on the outcome of IVF cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, we studied 152 IVF cycles. The PCOS patients undergoing COH using the GnRH agonist protocol (n = 50) showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate (36% vs. 19.6%, respectively), compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 102).

Repeated in vitro fertilization cycle attempts in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists.

To examine pregnancy rate in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with use of multidose GnRH antagonists in multiple repeated IVF cycle attempts, we conducted a survey in 785 consecutive IVF cycles in our unit. Although pregnancy rate significantly decreased beyond the second IVF cycle attempt, no significant decrease was noted between cycle attempts 3 and 4 and 5 to 8.

Follitropin-alpha (Gonal-F) versus follitropin-beta (Puregon) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization: is there any difference?

In an attempt to examine and compare the effect of the two commercially available recombinant FSH on ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF cycle outcome, we studied 264 IVF cycles in patients with a favorable prognosis a priori, 198 in patients using follitropin-alpha, and 68 in patients using follitropin-beta. Although both groups achieved a comparable number of retrieved oocytes, the use of follitropin-beta was associated with a tendency toward a lower clinical pregnancy rate (PR), and with significantly higher E(2) levels despite the use of significantly lower total gonadotropin dose.

Do stimulation characteristics of the first in vitro fertilization cycle predict pregnancy in women of 40 years old and over?

The failure of tests of ovarian reserve to predict clinical pregnancy in women 40 years old and older prompted this study of the predictive value of information obtained during the first cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Stimulation characteristics during the first IVF cycle attempt were unhelpful in predicting the possibility of clinical pregnancy within the first three consecutive IVF cycles.

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: their role in patients with an unfavorable prognosis a priori.

In an attempt to examine the influence of the type of GnRH analogue used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on IVF outcome in patients with an unfavorable outcome a priori, we studied 728 consecutive cycles in patients with repeated IVF failure. In patients with repeated failure, the GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate compared with the GnRH antagonist group (20.8% vs 14.5%).

Ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist for patients with repeated IVF failures and poor embryo quality.

To evaluate the appropriate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol in patients with repeated IVF failures and poor embryo quality we compared the stimulation characteristics of ten cycles which included ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist with the patients' earlier failed IVF attempts. The use of ultrashort GnRH agonist/GnRH antagonist COH protocol resulted in a significantly higher number and proportion of top-quality embryos, with a consequent improvement in clinical pregnancy rate (50%).

Is there a limit for the number of in vitro fertilization cycles for an individual patient?

To examine whether and when conception may be achieved in multiple repeated in vitro fertilization cycles, we surveyed the outcome of 2760 consecutive cycles in our unit. The pregnancy rate statistically significantly decreased after the third cycle attempt, but no statistically significant decrease was observed between cycles 4 and 20; an acceptable clinical pregnancy rate/cycle of 15% was achieved between cycles 7 and 20.

Does day 3 luteinizing-hormone level predict IVF success in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues?

To examine whether day 3 LH level or FSH-LH ratio predict IVF outcome, we studied patients with a favorable prognosis a priori undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH agonist (agonist group; n = 131) or antagonist (antagonist group; n = 137). Although LH level could not predict IVF outcome, patients undergoing COH using the GnRH antagonist or agonist protocols with FSH-LH ratios >2 or >3, respectively, achieved significantly lower pregnancy rates (11.1% vs. 27.7% and 8.3% vs. 31.9%, respectively).

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity.

To examine whether the choice of the GnRH analogues used during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), may influence endometrial receptivity, we studied 712 IVF cycles, in patients undergoing COH with GnRH agonist or antagonist and with the transfer of at least one top-quality embryo. The GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher endometrial thickness and higher pregnancy rate, suggestive of a higher endometrial receptivity, compared with the GnRH antagonist group.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: are we monitoring the appropriate sex-steroid hormones?

We prospectively evaluated the behavior of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), sex-steroid hormones, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in 27 patients during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). While routine measurement of COH via serum 17-OHP may replace estradiol (E(2)) and progesterone levels, additional studies are needed to elucidate the ceiling level of serum 17-OHP beyond which intervention is required to prevent severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the influence of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcome.

In an attempt to examine whether body mass index (BMI) may influence IVF outcome in patients undergoing COH with either GnRH-agonist (agonist group) or GnRH-antagonist (antagonist group), we studied 799 IVF cycles: 481 in the agonist group and 318 in the antagonist group. In patients with BMI >25 kg/m(2), COH with either GnRH-agonist or GnRH-antagonist achieved a comparable outcome; whereas in patients with BMI <25 kg/m(2), the use of GnRH-agonist suppressive protocol revealed significantly higher pregnancy rates.

Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs.

To evaluate the appropriate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol in poor responders, we compared the stimulation characteristics of 21 cycles, which included the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist combined with the flexible multidose GnRH antagonist, to the patients' previous failed in vitro fertilization attempts. The use of an ultrashort GnRH-agonist/GnRH-antagonist COH protocol resulted in a statistically significantly greater number of follicles larger than 14 mm on the day of hCG administration, a higher number of oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred, and a reasonable clinical pregnancy rate (14.3%).

Does physicians' experience influence in vitro fertilization success in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists?

In an attempt to examine whether physicians' experience may influence IVF outcome in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist (GnRH-a) controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols, we studied 273 consecutive patients, with a favorable prognosis a priori, admitted to our IVF unit, of whom 88 conceived. The highest pregnancy rate (PR) (46.5%) was observed in patients achieving, on day of hCG administration, an E(2)-to-follicle ratio <100 pg/mL. The timing of hCG administration is crucial in patients undergoing the GnRH-a COH for IVF to optimize success rate.