The impact of laparoscopic gynecological surgery training on the technicity index of a developing country center.

PURPOSE: To compare laparoscopic gynecological surgery training between a developed country's reference center (host center) and a public reference service in a developing country (home center), and use the technicity index (TI) to compare outcomes and to determine the impact of laparoscopic gynecological surgery fellowship training on the home center's TI. METHODS: The impact of training on the home center was assessed by comparing surgical performance before and after training. TI was assessed in 2017 in the host center, and before and after training in the home center. Epidemiological and clinical data, and information on reason for surgery, preoperative images, estimated intraoperative bleeding, operative time, surgical specimen weight, hospital stay length, complication and reintervention rates were collected from both institutions. Home center pre-training data were retrospectively collected between 2010 and 2013, while post-training data were prospectively collected between 2015 and 2017. A two-tail Z-score was used for TI comparison. RESULTS: The analysis included 366 hysterectomies performed at the host center in 2017, and 663 hysterectomies performed at the home center between 2015 and 2017. TI in the host center was 82.5%, while in the home center it was 6% before training and 22% after training. There were no statistical differences in length of hospital stay, preoperative uterine volume, surgical specimen weight and complication rate between centers. However, significantly shorter mean operative time and lower blood loss during surgery were observed in the host center. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality laparoscopic training in a world-renowned specialized center allowed standardizing laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures and helped to significantly improve TI in the recipient's center with comparable surgical outcomes.

Performance Assessment for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the Operating Room: Validity Evidence of a Procedure-specific Rating Scale.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The technical conduct of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is critical to surgical outcomes. This study explored the validity evidence of an objective scale specific to the assessment of technical skills (H-OSATS) for 7 tasks of an LH with salpingo-oophorectomy procedure performed in the operating room. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in Marseille and Montpellier, France. PATIENTS: Three groups of operators (novice, intermediate, and experienced surgeons) were video recorded during their live performances of LH on a simple case. For each group, a dozen unedited videos were obtained for the following tasks: division of the round ligament, division of the infundibulopelvic ligament, creation of the bladder flap, opening of the posterior peritoneum, division of the uterine vessels, colpotomy, and closure of the vault. INTERVENTIONS: Two qualified raters blindly assessed each video using the H-OSATS rating scale. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were calculated as measures of internal structure. In a separate round of evaluations, the raters provided a global competent/noncompetent decision for each performance. As a measure of consequential validity, a pass/fail score was set for each task using the contrasting group method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three tasks (creation of the bladder flap, colpotomy, and closure of the vault) displayed sound validity evidence: a meaningful total score difference among the 3 groups of experience as well as between the intermediate and experienced surgeons, reliability outcomes of >0.7, and a pass/fail score with a theoretical false-positive rate of <10%. CONCLUSION: The validity evidence of the H-OSATS rating scale differed for separate evaluations of the 7 tasks. Three tasks (i.e., creation of the bladder flap, colpotomy, and closure of the vault) revealed sound validity evidence, including at the level of the attending surgeon, whereas other tasks were more consistent with low-stakes formative evaluation standards.

Laparoscopic TOT-like Burch Colposuspension: Back to the Future?

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a modification of the classic Burch procedure, called "laparoscopic transobturator tape (TOT)-like Burch colposuspension." The technique does not involve any type of prosthesis placement, and it is an alternative for patients with stress urinary incontinence in a future without meshes. Describing and standardizing the procedure in different steps makes the surgery reproducible for gynecologists and safe for the patients. DESIGN: Step-by-step educational video, underlining and focusing on the main anatomical landmarks. SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital. INTERVENTIONS: The patient is set under general anesthesia and in lithotomy position. The distinct steps of the procedure are performed as followed: Step 1: Installation. Two 10-mm trocars are positioned in the midline and 2 5-mm trocars in the suprapubic region. The recommended intra-abdominal pressure is 6 to 8 mm Hg, and excessive Trendelenburg is not needed. Step 2: Entry in the Retzius space. The median umbilical ligament and the vesicoumbilical fascia are transected. Step 3: Exposure of the Retzius space and the anatomical structures. The dissection is continued consecutively toward the pubic bone and the Cooper's ligament, laterally toward the external iliac vessels and the corona mortis and medially toward the bladder neck. Step 4: Vaginal dissection. The pubocervical is dissected at the level of the pubourethral ligaments. Step 5: Suspension of the vagina to the Cooper's ligament. In contrast to the standard technique, with the TOT-like Burch, the sutures on the pubocervical fascia are placed at the level of the attachment of the arcus tendinous fascia pelvis and the pubourethral ligament. This way of suspension ensures a lateral traction on the bladder neck, resembling the effect of the TOT, which leads to lower incidence of dysuric symptoms. Step 6: Peritoneal closure. CONCLUSION: The classic colposuspension was created in 1961 for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence prolapse [1]. In the following years, vaginal meshes gained popularity as a treatment option for prolapse and for incontinence owing to their ease of use and satisfying results, which led to a decreased use of the Burch procedure [2,3]. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration forbid the production of the transvaginal meshes for prolapse [4], an interdiction that could influence the use of synthetic meshes for incontinence in the future [5]. Owing to these recent events, searching for an effective way of management for patients with stress urinary incontinence without any synthetic prostheses, gynecologists have turned back to the 60-year-old Burch colposuspension. One of the drawbacks of the original technique is the high incidence of voiding difficulties-up to 22% [6]. Owing to the knowledge of the exact course of traction with the TOT, in our modified technique, the lateral direction of the suspension provides a tension-free support on the urethra and the bladder neck. The laparoscopic TOT-like Burch colposuspension is a safe and effective treatment for patients with stress urinary incontinence with low rates of dysuric symptoms and represents a valuable alternative for gynecologists in a future without meshes.

Botulinum toxin infiltrations versus local anaesthetic infiltrations in pelvic floor myofascial pain: Multicentre, randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have demonstrated a link between pelvic floor myofascial syndromes and chronic pelvic pain. Botulinum toxin has been extensively used for several years in the field of pain, especially due to its action on muscle spasm. However, the efficacy of botulinum toxin in the context of chronic pelvic pain remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: This multicentre, randomized, controlled, double-blind study was designed to compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin and local anaesthetic (LA) injection versus LA injection alone for pelvic floor myofascial syndrome and chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: According to the number of painful trigger points detected on physical examination, patients received from 1 to 4 injections of botulinum toxin with LA (BTX) or LA alone. The primary endpoint was Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score on day 60 after infiltration. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, number of painful trigger points on palpation, analgesic drug consumption and quality of life. RESULTS: We included 80 patients, 40 in each group. This study failed to demonstrate a significant difference between the 2 groups on day 60 in the primary endpoint or secondary endpoints (PGI-I score≤2=20% [LA] versus 27.5% [BTX], P=0.43). However, both groups showed significant alleviation of global pain. CONCLUSION: This study does not justify the use of botulinum toxin in the context of chronic pelvic pain with myofascial syndrome but does justify muscle injections with LA alone. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01967524.

What Is a Good Teaching Video? Results of an Online International Survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To analyze surgeon views on criteria for a good teaching video with the aim of determining guidelines. DESIGN: An online international survey using a self-developed questionnaire. SETTING: A French university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred eighty-eight participants answered an online questionnaire (154 women [40.53%] and 226 men [59.47%]). INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire on the criteria for a good quality teaching surgery video was developed by our team and communicated via an online link. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The responses of 388 respondents were analyzed and highlighted the pedagogical benefits of teaching videos. The video duration may vary according to the type of media or surgical procedure but should not exceed 10 to 15 minutes for complex procedures. Providing information on the surgical setup (body mass index of the patient, Trendelenburg position degree, pressure of pneumoperitoneum, etc.) is essential. Surgical videos should be reviewed and divided into clearly defined steps with continued access to the entire nonmodified video for reviewers and be accessible on both educational and open platforms. Patient consent and relevant information should be made available. Reviews should include "bad procedure" videos, which are highly appreciated, especially by young surgeons. CONCLUSION: The many advantages of the video format, including availability and rising popularity, provide an opportunity to reinforce and complement current surgical teaching. To optimize use of this surgical teaching tool, standardization, updating, and ease of access of surgical videos should be promoted.

Minilaparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Current Practice Feasibility and Benefits: A Unicentric, Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether mini-instrumentation may be used for hysterectomy (HT) by all surgeons (assistants and seniors) without increasing the operative time or altering surgeon working conditions. DESIGN: A unicenter, randomized controlled, single blind, parallel, noninferiority trial comparing 2 surgical techniques. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-two patients undergoing HT for a benign gynecologic disease were enrolled in this study in our center between April 2, 2015, and June 1, 2018. Sixteen patients were randomized in group A and 16 patients in group B. INTERVENTIONS: HT with bilateral annexectomy or ovarian conservation using 3-mm instruments (group A) or conventional 5-mm instruments (group B). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Concerning the primary outcome, the operative time for the HT 3-mm group was 128 minutes (range, 122-150 minutes) versus 111 minutes (range, 92-143 minutes) for the HT 5-mm group (i.e., δ = 17 [90% confidence interval, -6 to 39]), with rejection of the noninferiority threshold at 35 minutes. Thirty-one percent of HTs initially performed using 3-mm instruments were completed with conventional instruments. HTs performed with mini-instruments required more concentration (p = .02) with surgeons reporting higher levels of frustration (p = .009) and sense of failure (p = .006). Patients tend to experience greater satisfaction regarding scars with a significant difference noted during the postoperative visit both for scar pain (1 vs 4 patients with moderate pain [30-50 mm on the Patient Scar Assessment Scale) in the HT 3-mm group and the HT 5-mm group, respectively) and scar firmness (p = .021; 3 vs 7 patients with moderate firmness [30-50 mm on the Patient Scar Assessment Scale] in the HT 3-mm group and the HT 5-mm group, respectively). CONCLUSION: Total minilaparoscopic HT appears inferior to standard laparoscopy in terms of operative time and surgeon working conditions; only the short-term cosmetic appearance was in favor of the 3-mm approach.

Patient Quality of Life and Symptoms after Surgical Treatment for Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of surgical treatment of endometriosis on quality of life and pain over a 3-year period of postoperative follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective and multicenter cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Five districts including a tertiary referral center and private and general public hospitals. PATIENT: Patients (n = 981), aged 15 to 50years, underwent laparoscopic treatment (preferred approach) for endometriosis between January 2004 and December 2012. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis. All revised American Fertility Society stages were included. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean visual analog scale score for dysmenorrhea fell from 5.3 ± 3.7 (time 0) to 2.6 ± 3.3 at 6 months, and 2.3 ± 3.3 at 36 months of follow-up (p <.001). Mean visual analog scale scores for chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia fell from 2.6 ± 3.5 and 2.7 ± 3.2, respectively, before surgery to 1.4 ± 2.5 and 1.1 ± 2.2 at 6 months and then 1.3 ± 2.5 and 1.2 ± 2.3 at 36 months of follow-up. The Short Form 36-Item survey analysis revealed the greatest increases linked to physical domains (i.e., bodily pain and role limitations) from 54.6 ± .9 and 63.3 ± 1.3, respectively, at time 0 to 74.4 ± .9 and 81.9 ± 1.1 at 6 months of follow-up (p <.001), with scores subsequently remaining stable. Among mental domains the most favorable results involved social functioning and role limitations due to emotional problems, which increased from 66 ± .8 and 65.7 ± 1.3 at time 0 to 75.6 ± .9 and 77.4 ± 1.3 at 6 months of follow-up, respectively (p <.001), with scores remaining stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of endometriosis improves pelvic and sexual pain postoperatively in many women with endometriosis. Improvement later plateaus and remains stable, allowing patients to experience the beneficial effects over a period of years.

Laparoscopic Promontofixation in 10 Steps.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic promontofixation has all the advantages of a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of urogenital prolapse. The standardization and description of the technique was the main objective of this video. We describe the complete procedure in 10 steps, which could help to understand and perform this procedure simply, easily, and safely. DESIGN: Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique. SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with indication for the laparoscopic treatment of urogenital prolapse. The local institutional review board ruled that approval was not required for this video article. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ten main steps were identified and described in detail during laparoscopic promontofixation: step 1, exposition of the operating field; step 2, dissection of the promontory; step 3, pararectal dissection; step 4, rectovaginal dissection; step 5, vesicovaginal dissection; step 6, supracervical hysterectomy; step 7, fixation of the prosthesis; step 8, peritonization; step 9, fixing the prosthesis to the promontory; and step 10, uterine morcellation. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic promontofixation is an effective technique for prolapse surgery. The 10 steps help to perform each part of the surgery in logical sequences, making the procedure faster to adopt and easy to learn. Standardization of laparoscopic techniques could help to reduce learning curve.

Transrectal Mesh Erosion Requiring Bowel Resection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a transrectal mesh erosion as complication of laparoscopic promontofixation with mesh repair, necessitating bowel resection and subsequent surgical interventions. INTRODUCTION: Sacrocolpopexy has become a standard procedure for vaginal vault prolapse [1], and the laparoscopic approach has gained popularity owing to more rapid recovery and less morbidity [2,3]. Mesh erosion is a well-known complication of surgical treatment for prolapse as reported in several negative evaluations, including a report from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011 [4]. Mesh complications are more common after surgeries via the vaginal approach [5]; nonetheless, the incidence of vaginal mesh erosion after laparoscopic procedures is as high as 9% [6]. The incidence of transrectal mesh exposure after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is roughly 1% [7]. The diagnosis may be delayed because of its rarity and variable presentation. In addition, polyester meshes, such as the mesh used in this case, carry a higher risk of exposure [8]. CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman experiencing genital prolapse, with the cervix classified as +3 according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, underwent laparoscopic standard sacrocolpopexy using polyester mesh. Subtotal hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy were performed concomitantly. A 3-year follow-up consultation demonstrated no signs or symptoms of erosion of any type. At 7 years after the surgery, however, the patient presented with rectal discharge, diagnosed as infectious rectocolitis with the isolation of Clostridium difficile. She underwent a total of 5 repair surgeries in a period of 4 months, including transrectal resection of exposed mesh, laparoscopic ablation of mesh with digestive resection, exploratory laparoscopy with abscess drainage, and exploratory laparoscopy with ablation of residual mesh and transverse colostomy. She recovered well after the last intervention, exhibiting no signs of vaginal or rectal fistula and no recurrence of pelvic floor descent. Her intestinal transit was reestablished, and she was satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSION: None of the studies that represent the specific female population submitted to laparoscopic promontofixation with transrectal mesh erosion describe the need for more than one intervention or digestive resection [9-12]. Physicians dealing with patients submitted to pelvic reconstructive surgeries with mesh placement should be aware of transrectal and other nonvaginal erosions of mesh, even being rare events. Moreover, they should perform an active search for unusual gynecologic and anorectal signs and symptoms. Most importantly, patients undergoing mesh repair procedures must be warned of the risks of the surgery, including the possibility of several subsequent interventions.

Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.

In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologist who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills, are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Although the apprentice-tutor model has long been a successful approach for training of surgeons, recently, clinicians have recognised that endoscopic surgery requires an important training phase outside the operating theatre. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA) recognises the necessity of this structured approach and implements two separated stages in its learning strategy. In the first stage, a skill certificate on theoretical knowledge and specific practical psychomotor skills is acquired through a high-stake exam; in the second stage, a clinical programme is completed to achieve surgical competence and receive the corresponding diploma. Three diplomas can be awarded: (a) the Bachelor in Endoscopy, (b) the Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS) and (c) the Master level. The Master level is sub-divided into two separate diplomas: the Master in Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery and the Master in Hysteroscopy. The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control. This programme is based on the best available scientific evidence, and it counteracts the problem of the traditional surgical apprentice-tutor model. It is seen as a major step toward standardisation of endoscopic surgical training in general.

Does experience in hysteroscopy improve accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding?

BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic reliability may be influenced by the experience of the operator and by a lack of morphological diagnostic criteria for endometrial malignant pathologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the inter-observer agreement (IOA) in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) among different experienced gynecologists. METHODS: Each gynecologist, without any other clinical information, was asked to evaluate the anonymous video recordings of 51 consecutive patients who underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial resection for AUB. Experts (>500 hysteroscopies), seniors (20-499 procedures) and junior (≤19 procedures) gynecologists were asked to judge endometrial macroscopic appearance (benign, suspicious or frankly malignant). They also had to propose the histological diagnosis (atrophic or proliferative endometrium; simple, glandulocystic or atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma). Observers were free to indicate whether the quality of recordings were not good enough for adequate assessment. IOA (k coefficient), sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and the likelihood ratio were calculated. RESULTS: Five expert, five senior and six junior gynecologists were involved in the study. Considering endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 55.5 % and 84.5 % for juniors, 66.6 % and 81.2 % for seniors and 86.6 % and 87.3 % for experts. Concerning endometrial macroscopic appearance, IOA was poor for juniors (k = 0.10) and fair for seniors and experts (k = 0.23 and 0.22, respectively). IOA was poor for juniors and experts (k = 0.18 and 0.20, respectively) and fair for seniors (k = 0.30) in predicting the histological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity improves with the observer's experience, but inter-observer agreement and reproducibility of hysteroscopy for endometrial malignancies are not satisfying no matter the level of expertise. Therefore, an accurate and complete endometrial sampling is still needed.

Laparoscopic-assisted Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement: A Technique to Avoid Major Complications.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for the safe placement of retropubic midurethral slings in patients undergoing concomitant laparoscopic surgery in order to avoid major complications associated with this procedure such as bladder perforation and retropubic hematomas. DESIGN: Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique. SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with an indication for retropubic midurethral sling placement because of recurrent stress urinary incontinence, intrinsic sphincter deficiency, or severe pelvic organ prolapse in whom a concomitant laparoscopic surgery has to be performed for other medical conditions. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic opening and dissection of the Retzius space and insertion of the sling under a laparoscopic view of this space. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This technique has been mainly used in patients undergoing laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse repair. No complications have been identified so far, even in high-risk patients such as those with previous Burch colposuspension. CONCLUSION: This is a simple and reproducible technique for preventing major complications associated with retropubic sling placement in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for other reasons. It also permits the immediate detection and even resolution of complications in case any arise. Even high-risk patients may be safely approached.

Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.

In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologist who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Although the apprentice-tutor model has long been a successful approach for training of surgeons, recently, clinicians have recognised that endoscopic surgery requires an important training phase outside the operating theatre. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA), recognises the necessity of this structured approach and implements two separated stages in its learning strategy. In the first stage, a skill certificate on theoretical knowledge and specific practical psychomotor skills is acquired through a high stake exam; in the second stage, a clinical programme is completed to achieve surgical competence and receive the corresponding diploma. Three diplomas can be awarded: (a) the Bachelor in Endoscopy; (b) the Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS); and (c) the Master level. The Master level is sub-divided into two separate diplomas: the Master in Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery and the Master in Hysteroscopy. The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control. This programme is based on the best available scientific evidence and it counteracts the problem of the traditional surgical apprentice tutor model. It is seen as a major step toward standardization of endoscopic surgical training in general.

Are gynecologists sufficiently trained and educated on electro surgery and basic laparoscopic setting?

BACKGROUND: Basic knowledge of electrosurgery and patient's safety during laparoscopic setup are fundamental, as laparoscopic surgical skills do. The aim of this prospective case-control study was to assess the improvement of such knowledge and skills among gynecologists. METHODS: Gynecologists attending a training course on laparoscopy at the Centre International de Chirurgie Endoscopique (CICE), Clermont Ferrand (France) (December 2013-March 2014) were asked to answer a questionnaire about their own clinical activity and basic surgical knowledge and skills at the beginning and end of the course. The questionnaire included multiple choice questions about technical (four questions) and safety (five questions) aspects of laparoscopic set up and electrosurgery (five questions). RESULTS: Sixty-two residents and 68 graduated gynecologists completed pre- and post-course questionnaires (PrQ and PoQ, respectively). Considering 9 as an arbitrary cut-off score indicating an adequate theoretical knowledge, a total of 70 (51.8 %) and 128 (94.8 %) participants had a sufficient score at the PrQ and PoQ, respectively. Only 9.6 % of participants were able to complete PoQ without making any mistakes, with a mean PrQ score of 9.5. At the beginning, the most difficult steps in laparoscopy in participants' opinion were intra-corporeal suture and insufflation of pneumoperitoneum (both 36.1 %). After the course and the practical training, only 20 % of participants still indicated intra-corporeal suture as the most difficult. CONCLUSION: Education on electro surgery and basic laparoscopic setting and laparoscopic practical training are necessary to improve and maintain laparoscopic surgical skills. The assessment of that knowledge is mandatory to define surgical competence.

What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show that in selected cases laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be used for the treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal mesh surgery. METHODS: Step-by-step examination of the technique using an educative video. Institutional review board approval was obtained. SETTING: The authors describe two clinical cases of treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse, after a vaginal mesh surgery, using laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. PATIENTS: A 56-year old patient (para 3, gravida 2) presented with the sentation of bulging in the vagina. On physical examination, the patient had a grade 2-3 vaginal apical prolapse and a stage 4 rectocele. She had a slight mesh contraction but no vaginal extrusion and no pain were reported. Eleven years before, she had a vaginal total hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse correction and one year before she had a vaginal prolapse repair using a synthetic mesh. A laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with bilateral ooforectomy was performed. The second case is of a 54-year old patient (para 2, gravida 2) that presented stress urinary incontinence. On physical examination, the patient had a grade 3 uterine prolapse and grade 2 cystocele. Eleven years before she had a vaginal prolapse repair using a synthetic mesh and a miduretral sling for stress urinary incontinence. Two years before, she had the miduretal sling removed for recurrent urinary infections and dysuria. A laparoscopic sub-total hysterectomy with salpingectomy and ovarian conservation, sacrocolpopexy and a Burch colposuspension was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The procedures and postoperative recovery were uneventful. No minor or major complications occurred. The patients were discharged three days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a promising approach for the treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal mesh surgery. It appears to be feasible, safe, and effective.

[Morbidity of pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer]. / Les lymphadénectomies dans le cancer de l'endomètre, bilan après 4ans de pratique, doit-on poursuivre?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of endometrial cancer following the changes to the recommendations of INCa 2010. This is a retrospective study of 208 patients operated for endometrial cancer between July 2010 and March 2014 in two referral centers. Eighty lymphadenectomy were performed, 65 with hysterectomy and bilateral annexectomy and 18 lymphadenectomy were performed for restaging. Complications assessment is based on the Dindo Clavien classification. We report 17 severe complications (grade 3a and over) (P<0.001), including 14 among patients receiving lymphadenectomy. Morbidity increases with the number of lymphnodes removed and their positivity (P<0.001). The para-aortic lymphadenectomy is primarily responsible for complications (P <0.001). We describe 7 lower limbs lymphedema, 12 nerve injuries, 8 ileus, 5 venous or arterial thromboembolism, 17 blood transfusions, 13 lymphoceles including 9 infected. The rate of intraoperative complications on a first lymphadenectomy is 8% while it reached 22% for restaging. Restaging is significantly more at risk of serious complications (P=0.03) with two deaths. Twenty-four chronic disorders with impaired quality of life (2 without lymphadenectomy) are reported. They are present in 50% of restaging (P=0.033 compared to first lymphadenectomy). Lymphadenectomy is a source of severe morbidity (17.5%) with 2.5% mortality. The benefit of this surgery should probably be discussed again.

Laparoscopic Ureteroneocystostomy: Be Prepared!

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ureteroneocystotomy in gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy between April 2008 and May 2012. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Retrospective case series study. SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Nine patients underwent ureteroneocystostomy: 3 patients had ureteral endometriosis stenoses; and 6 patients had iatrogenic ureter injuries. INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The ureterovesical re-implantation was unilateral in 8 cases and bilateral for 1 patient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean operating time was 226.7 min (range, 120-480). Average blood loss was 114.4 mL (range, 30-400). The mean duration of the in-dwelling catheter was 10.4 days (range, 7-21); the average hospital stay was 12.6 days (range, 6-26). The mean duration of the ureteral double J stent was 7.8 weeks (range, 6-16). One patient was re-operated for vaginal and laparoscopic drainage of a pelvic abscess on the sixth postoperative day. The median follow-up time was 20.8 months (range, 9-36), No patient had stenosis or breakdown of a suture line. CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms the feasibility and the effectiveness of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. This minimally invasive approach, which avoids laparotomy, requires a multidisciplinary team.

Laparoscopy-like operative vaginoscopy: a new approach to manage mesh erosions.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Mesh erosion through the vagina is the most common complication of synthetic mesh used for pelvic organ prolapse repair. However, conventional transvaginal mesh excision has many technical limitations. We aimed at creating and describing a new surgical technique for transvaginal removal of exposed mesh that would enable better exposition and access, thus facilitating optimal treatment. DESIGN: A step-by-step video showing the technique. SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Five patients previously submitted to pelvic organ prolapse repair using synthetic mesh, presenting mesh erosion through the vagina. INTERVENTIONS: Mesh excision using a laparoscopy-like operative vaginoscopy in which standard laparoscopic instruments are used through a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port device placed in the vagina. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In all cases, a very good exposure of the mesh was achieved, a minimal tissue traction was required, and the procedures were performed in a very ergonomic way. All the patients were discharged on the same day of the surgery and had a painless postoperative course. So far, there have been no cases of relapse. CONCLUSION: This seems to be a simple, cheap, and valuable minimally invasive technique with many advantages in comparison with the conventional approach. More cases and time are necessary to access its long-term efficacy. It may possibly be used for the management of other conditions.