Traditional care of the perineum during birth. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 1,076 women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the traditional hands-on versus the innovative hands-poised method on the risk of perineal trauma during vaginal delivery and on neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized, multicenter study, 1,161 of 1,505 women giving birth at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital of Vienna and Semmelweis Women's Hospital, Vienna, between February and September 1999, were randomized into the trial. In the hands-on method, the left hand of the midwife puts pressure on the infant's head, and the right hand is placed against the perineum. In the hands-poised method, the midwife guides the parturient through the birth without touching the perineum, prepared to apply light pressure on the infant's head. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven of 574 women (32.5%) in the hands-on group and 180 of 502 women (35.8%) in the hands-poised group experienced perineal tears (P = .5). Sixteen women (2.7%) treated with the hands-on method developed third-degree perineal tears as compared with five women (0.9%) treated with the hands-poised method (P < .05). In the hands-on group, 103 women (17.9%) underwent episiotomy as compared with 51 cases (10.1%) in the hands-poised group (P < .01). No significant differences in neonatal outcomes were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a policy of hands-poised care is more suitable for preserving the perineum during birth and is a safe and effective birthing alternative for women.

A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor. Insert vs. tablet.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) vaginal insert with PGE2 administered as a vaginal tablet. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, observational study was performed. Women requiring induction of labor were randomly assigned to receive either a 10-mg PGE2 vaginal insert (group 1, n = 100) or 3-mg PGE2 tablets twice at six-hour intervals (group 2, n = 100). The primary efficacy outcome variable was vaginal delivery within 24 hours of insertion. The criteria for safety were the occurrence of uterine hyperstimulation, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, use of beta 2-sympathomimetic drugs and fetal outcome. RESULTS: No differences in terms of vaginal delivery or cesarean section within 24 hours of induction were found. The cesarean section rate was 21% in group 1 and 22% in group 2. The interval from insertion of the induction agent to the onset of regular uterine contractions and the insertion-to-delivery interval were not different between the two cohorts. No difference in the frequency of uterine hyperstimulation, use of beta 2-sympathomimetic drugs, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, fetal outcome, or oxytocin and analgesic requirements were found. In seven of eight patients in group 1 who experienced uterine hyperstimulation, removal of the insert was sufficient to stop it, whereas in group 2, of nine cases, eight needed medical interventions to end hyperstimulation (P = .003). CONCLUSION: The continuous release of PGE2 from the vaginal insert permits controlled induction of labor, and easy removal of the drug in cases of uterine hyperstimulation is possible.