Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Phys Med ; 121: 103365, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663347

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To establish size-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) based on patient CT examinations performed on 74 CT devices. To assess task-based image quality (IQ) for each device and to investigate the variability of dose and IQ across different CTs. To propose a dose/IQ optimization. METHODS: 1051 CT pulmonary angiography dose data were collected. DRLs were calculated as the 75th percentile of CT dose index (CTDI) for two patient categories based on the thoracic perimeters. IQ was assessed with two thoracic phantom sizes using local acquisition parameters and three other dose levels. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a 2 mm low perfused vessel was assessed with a non-prewhitening with eye-filter model observer. The optimal IQ-dose point was mathematically assessed from the relationship between IQ and dose. RESULTS: The DRLs of CTDIvol were 6.4 mGy and 10 mGy for the two patient categories. 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol were 6.3 mGy and 10 mGy for the two phantom sizes with inter-quartile AUC values of 0.047 and 0.066, respectively. After the optimization, 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol decreased to 5.9 mGy and 7.55 mGy and the interquartile AUC values were reduced to 0.025 and 0.057 for the two phantom sizes. CONCLUSION: DRLs for PE were proposed as a function of patient thoracic perimeters. This study highlights the variability in terms of dose and IQ. An optimization process can be started individually and lead to a harmonization of practice throughout multiple CT sites.


Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Phantoms, Imaging , Pulmonary Embolism , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Diagnostic Reference Levels , Male , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Female , Quality Control , Aged , Middle Aged
2.
Invest Radiol ; 2024 Jan 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal energy level of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) from photon-counting detector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of liver lesions as a function of phantom size and radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with liver parenchyma and lesions was imaged on a dual-source photon-counting detector CT at 120 kVp. Five hypoattenuating lesions with a lesion-to-background contrast difference of -30 HU and -45 HU and 3 hyperattenuating lesions with +30 HU and +90 HU were used. The lesion diameter was 5-10 mm. Rings of fat-equivalent material were added to emulate medium- or large-sized patients. The medium size was imaged at a volume CT dose index of 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mGy and the large size at 5 and 2.5 mGy, respectively. Each setup was imaged 10 times. For each setup, VMIs from 40 to 80 keV at 5 keV increments were reconstructed with quantum iterative reconstruction at a strength level of 4 (QIR-4). Lesion detectability was measured as area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) using a channelized Hotelling model observer with 10 dense differences of Gaussian channels. RESULTS: Overall, highest detectability was found at 65 and 70 keV for both hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating lesions in the medium and large phantom independent of radiation dose (AUC range, 0.91-1.0 for the medium and 0.94-0.99 for the large phantom, respectively). The lowest detectability was found at 40 keV irrespective of the radiation dose and phantom size (AUC range, 0.78-0.99). A more pronounced reduction in detectability was apparent at 40-50 keV as compared with 65-75 keV when radiation dose was decreased. At equal radiation dose, detection as a function of VMI energy differed stronger for the large size as compared with the medium-sized phantom (12% vs 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Detectability of hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating liver lesions differed between VMI energies for different phantom sizes and radiation doses. Virtual monoenergetic images at 65 and 70 keV yielded highest detectability independent of phantom size and radiation dose.

3.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 10(10)2023 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37887871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used as a non-invasive tool to assess coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CCTA is subject to motion artifacts, potentially limiting its clinical utility. Despite faster (0.35 and 0.28 s/rot) gantry rotation times, low (60-65 bpm) heartbeat is recommended, and the use of ß-blockers is often needed. Technological advancements have resulted in the development of faster rotation speeds (0.23 s/rot). However, their added value in patients not premedicated with ß-blockers remains unclear. This prospective single-center, two-arm, randomized, controlled trial aims to assess the influence of fast rotation on coronary motion artifacts, diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for CAD, and patient safety. METHODS: We will randomize a total of 142 patients aged ≥ 50 scheduled for an aortic stenosis work-up to receive CCTA with either a fast (0.23) or standard (0.28 s/rot) gantry speed. PRIMARY OUTCOME: rate of CCTAs with coronary motion artifacts hindering interpretation. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: assessable coronary segments rate, diagnostic accuracy against invasive coronary angiography (ICA), motion artifact magnitude per segment, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and patient ionizing radiation dose. The local ethics committee has approved the protocol. Potential significance: FAST-CCT may improve motion artifact reduction and diagnosis quality, thus eliminating the need for rate control and ß-blocker administration. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT05709652.

4.
Phys Med ; 108: 102558, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36905775

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare quantitatively and qualitatively brain image quality acquired in helical and axial modes on two wide collimation CT systems according to the dose level and algorithm used. METHODS: Acquisitions were performed on an image quality and an anthropomorphic phantoms at three dose levels (CTDIvol: 45/35/25 mGy) on two wide collimation CT systems (GE Healthcare and Canon Medical Systems) in axial and helical modes. Raw data were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR) and deep-learning image reconstruction (DLR) algorithms. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was computed on both phantoms and the task-based transfer function (TTF) on the image quality phantom. The subjective quality of images from an anthropomorphic brain phantom was evaluated by two radiologists including overall image quality. RESULTS: For the GE system, noise magnitude and noise texture (average NPS spatial frequency) were lower with DLR than with IR. For the Canon system, noise magnitude values were lower with DLR than with IR for similar noise texture but the opposite was true for spatial resolution. For both CT systems, noise magnitude was lower with the axial mode than with the helical mode for similar noise texture and spatial resolution. Radiologists rated the overall quality of all brain images as "satisfactory for clinical use", whatever the dose level, algorithm or acquisition mode. CONCLUSIONS: Using 16-cm axial acquisition reduces image noise without changing the spatial resolution and image texture compared to helical acquisitions. Axial acquisition can be used in clinical routine for brain CT examinations with an explored length of less than 16 cm.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Algorithms , Phantoms, Imaging , Brain , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
5.
Invest Radiol ; 58(4): 245-252, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess image noise, diagnostic performance, and potential for radiation dose reduction of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) with quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) in the detection of hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating focal liver lesions compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A medium-sized anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with liver parenchyma and lesions (diameter, 5-10 mm; hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating from -30 HU to +90 HU at 120 kVp) was used. The phantom was imaged on ( a ) a third-generation dual-source EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) in the dual-energy mode at 100 and 150 kVp with tin filtration and ( b ) a clinical dual-source PCD-CT at 120 kVp (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens). Scans were repeated 10 times for each of 3 different radiation doses of 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mGy. Datasets were reconstructed as virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 60 keV for both scanners and as linear-blended images (LBIs) for EID-CT. For PCD-CT, VMIs were reconstructed with different strength levels of QIR (QIR 1-4) and without QIR (QIR-off). For EID-CT, VMIs and LBIs were reconstructed using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction at a strength level of 3. Noise power spectrum was measured to compare image noise magnitude and texture. A channelized Hotelling model observer was used to assess diagnostic accuracy for lesion detection. The potential for radiation dose reduction using PCD-CT was estimated for the QIR strength level with the highest area under the curve compared with EID-CT for each radiation dose. RESULTS: Image noise decreased with increasing QIR level at all radiation doses. Using QIR-4, noise reduction was 41%, 45%, and 59% compared with EID-CT VMIs and 12%, 18%, and 33% compared with EID-CT LBIs at 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. The peak spatial frequency shifted slightly to lower frequencies at higher QIR levels. Lesion detection accuracy increased at higher QIR levels and was higher for PCD-CT compared with EID-CT VMIs. The improvement in detection with PCD-CT was strongest at the lowest radiation dose, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.917 for QIR-4 versus 0.677 for EID-CT VMIs for hyperattenuating lesions, and 0.900 for QIR-4 versus 0.726 for EID-CT VMIs for hypoattenuating lesions. Compared with EID-CT LBIs, detection was higher for QIR 1-4 at 2.5 mGy and for QIR 2-4 at 1.25 mGy (eg, 0.900 for QIR-4 compared with 0.854 for EID-CT LBIs at 1.25 mGy). Radiation dose reduction potential of PCD-CT with QIR-4 was 54% at 5 mGy compared with VMIs and 39% at 2.5 mGy compared with LBIs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EID-CT, PCD-CT with QIR substantially improved focal liver lesion detection, especially at low radiation dose. This enables substantial radiation dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.


Subject(s)
Drug Tapering , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Photons , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
6.
Radiology ; 305(1): 107-115, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670712

ABSTRACT

Background Accurate CT attenuation and diagnostic quality of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images acquired with photon-counting detector (PCD) CT are needed to replace true noncontrast (TNC) scans. Purpose To assess the attenuation errors and image quality of VNC images from abdominal PCD CT compared with TNC images. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, consecutive adult patients who underwent a triphasic examination with PCD CT from July 2021 to October 2021 were included. VNC images were reconstructed from arterial and portal venous phase CT. The absolute attenuation error of VNC compared with TNC images was measured in multiple structures by two readers. Then, two readers blinded to image reconstruction assessed the overall image quality, image noise, noise texture, and delineation of small structures using five-point discrete visual scales (5 = excellent, 1 = nondiagnostic). Overall image quality greater than or equal to 3 was deemed diagnostic. In a phantom, noise texture, spatial resolution, and detectability index were assessed. A detectability index greater than or equal to 5 indicated high diagnostic accuracy. Interreader agreement was evaluated using the Krippendorff α coefficient. The paired t test and Friedman test were applied to compare objective and subjective results. Results Overall, 100 patients (mean age, 72 years ± 10 [SD]; 81 men) were included. In patients, VNC image attenuation values were consistent between readers (α = .60), with errors less than 5 HU in 76% and less than 10 HU in 95% of measurements. There was no evidence of a difference in error of VNC images from arterial or portal venous phase CT (3.3 HU vs 3.5 HU, P = .16). Subjective image quality was rated lower in VNC images for all categories (all, P < .001). Diagnostic quality of VNC images was reached in 99% and 100% of patients for readers 1 and 2, respectively. In the phantom, VNC images exhibited 33% higher noise, blotchier noise texture, similar spatial resolution, and inferior but overall good image quality (detectability index >20) compared with TNC images. Conclusion Abdominal virtual noncontrast images from the arterial and portal venous phase of photon-counting detector CT yielded accurate CT attenuation and good image quality compared with true noncontrast images. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Sosna in this issue.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
7.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(2)2022 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35204611

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to characterize image quality and to determine the optimal strength levels of a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm (quantum iterative reconstruction, QIR) for low-dose, ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) of the lung. Images were acquired on a clinical dual-source PCD-CT in the UHR mode and reconstructed with a sharp lung reconstruction kernel at different strength levels of QIR (QIR-1 to QIR-4) and without QIR (QIR-off). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and target transfer function (TTF) were analyzed in a cylindrical phantom. 52 consecutive patients referred for low-dose UHR chest PCD-CT were included (CTDIvol: 1 ± 0.6 mGy). Quantitative image quality analysis was performed computationally which included the calculation of the global noise index (GNI) and the global signal-to-noise ratio index (GSNRI). The mean attenuation of the lung parenchyma was measured. Two readers graded images qualitatively in terms of overall image quality, image sharpness, and subjective image noise using 5-point Likert scales. In the phantom, an increase in the QIR level slightly decreased spatial resolution and considerably decreased noise amplitude without affecting the frequency content. In patients, GNI decreased from QIR-off (202 ± 34 HU) to QIR-4 (106 ± 18 HU) (p < 0.001) by 48%. GSNRI increased from QIR-off (4.4 ± 0.8) to QIR-4 (8.2 ± 1.6) (p < 0.001) by 87%. Attenuation of lung parenchyma was highly comparable among reconstructions (QIR-off: -849 ± 53 HU to QIR-4: -853 ± 52 HU, p < 0.001). Subjective noise was best in QIR-4 (p < 0.001), while QIR-3 was best for sharpness and overall image quality (p < 0.001). Thus, our phantom and patient study indicates that QIR-3 provides the optimal iterative reconstruction level for low-dose, UHR PCD-CT of the lungs.

8.
Eur Radiol ; 32(2): 1227-1237, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327581

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess task-based image quality for two abdominal protocols on various CT scanners. To establish a relationship between diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and task-based image quality. METHODS: A protocol for the detection of focal liver lesions was used to scan an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom containing 8- and 5-mm low-contrast (20 HU) spheres at five CTDIvol levels (4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 mGy) on 12 CTs. Another phantom with high-contrast calcium targets (200 HU) was scanned at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15 mGy using a renal stones protocol on the same CTs. To assess the detectability, a channelized Hotelling observer was used for low-contrast targets and a non-prewhitening observer with an eye filter was used for high contrast targets. The area under the ROC curve and signal to noise ratio were used as figures of merit. RESULTS: For the detection of 8-mm spheres, the image quality reached a high level (mean AUC over all CTs higher than 0.95) at 11 mGy. For the detection of 5-mm spheres, the AUC never reached a high level of image quality. Variability between CTs was found, especially at low dose levels. For the search of renal stones, the AUC was nearly maximal even for the lowest dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable task-based image quality cannot be reached at the same dose level on all CT scanners. This variability implies the need for scanner-specific dose optimization. KEY POINTS: • There is an image quality variability for subtle low-contrast lesion detection in the clinically used dose range. • Diagnostic reference levels were linked with task-based image quality metrics. • There is a need for specific dose optimization for each CT scanner and clinical protocol.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Reference Levels , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Algorithms , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
9.
Eur Radiol ; 32(1): 524-532, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185147

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality (IQ) of a spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) using filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms (iDose4), in comparison with a dual-layer CT (DLCT) system, and to choose the best image quality according to the IR level for SPCCT. METHODS: Two phantoms were scanned using a standard lung protocol (120 kVp, 40 mAs) with SPCCT and DLCT systems. Raw data were reconstructed using FBP and 9 iDose4 levels (i1/i2/i3/i4/i5/i6/i7/i9/i11) for SPCCT and 7 for DLCT (i1/i2/i3/i4/i5/i6/i7). Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index (d') was computed for detection of 4 mm ground-glass nodule (GGN) and solid nodule. Two chest radiologists performed an IQ evaluation (noise/nodule sharpness/nodule conspicuity/overall IQ) in consensus, and chose the best image for SPCCT. RESULTS: Noise magnitude was -47% ± 2% lower on average with SPCCT than with DLCT for iDose4 range from i1 to i6. Average NPS spatial frequencies increased for SPCCT in comparison with DLCT. TTF also increased, except for the air insert with FBP, and i1/i2/i3. Higher detectability was found for SPCCT for both GGN and solid nodules. IQ for both types of nodule was rated consistently higher with SPCCT than with DLCT for the same iDose4 level. For SPCCT and both nodules, the scores for noise and conspicuity improved with increasing iDose4 level. iDose4 level 6 provided the best subjective IQ for both types of nodule. CONCLUSIONS: Higher IQ for GGN and solid nodules was demonstrated with SPCCT compared with DLCT with better detectability using iDose4. KEY POINTS: Using spectral photon-counting CT compared with dual-layer CT, noise magnitude was reduced with improvements in spatial resolution and detectability of ground-glass nodules and solid lung nodules. As the iDose4 level increased, noise magnitude was reduced and detectability of ground-glass and solid lung nodules was better for both CT systems. For spectral photon-counting CT imaging, two chest radiologists determined iDose4 level 6 as the best image quality for detecting ground-glass nodules and solid lung nodules.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Algorithms , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage
10.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(12)2021 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34943611

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate spectral photon-counting CT's (SPCCT) objective image quality characteristics in vitro, compared with standard-of-care energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT. METHODS: We scanned a thorax phantom with a coronary artery module at 10 mGy on a prototype SPCCT and a clinical dual-layer EID-CT under various conditions of simulated patient size (small, medium, and large). We used filtered back-projection with a soft-tissue kernel. We assessed noise and contrast-dependent spatial resolution with noise power spectra (NPS) and target transfer functions (TTF), respectively. Detectability indices (d') of simulated non-calcified and lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques were computed using the non-pre-whitening with eye filter model observer. RESULTS: SPCCT provided lower noise magnitude (9-38% lower NPS amplitude) and higher noise frequency peaks (sharper noise texture). Furthermore, SPCCT provided consistently higher spatial resolution (30-33% better TTF10). In the detectability analysis, SPCCT outperformed EID-CT in all investigated conditions, providing superior d'. SPCCT reached almost perfect detectability (AUC ≈ 95%) for simulated 0.5-mm-thick non-calcified plaques (for large-sized patients), whereas EID-CT had lower d' (AUC ≈ 75%). For lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques, SPCCT achieved 85% AUC vs. 77.5% with EID-CT. CONCLUSIONS: SPCCT outperformed EID-CT in detecting simulated coronary atherosclerosis and might enhance diagnostic accuracy by providing lower noise magnitude, markedly improved spatial resolution, and superior lipid core detectability.

11.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 195(3-4): 289-295, 2021 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647105

ABSTRACT

Nationwide surveys on radiation dose to the population from medical imaging are recommended in order to follow trends in population exposure. The goal of the 2018 survey was to investigate the current exposure. The invoice coding information was collected in five university hospitals and large clinics. To improve the estimation of the effective dose delivered in computed tomography (CT), we collected dose data from different Dose Archiving Communication Systems. On average, we found that 1.2 radiological examinations per year and per inhabitant were performed. Dental radiography was the most frequent examination (48% of all the X-ray examinations), followed by conventional radiography (36%) and CT (11%). The average annual effective dose was estimated to be 1.48 mSv per inhabitant, with CT representing 64% of that dose. Our results show that the exposure of the Swiss population from medical imaging has remained stable since 2013, despite a 15% increase in the number of CT examinations.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , X-Rays
12.
Radiol Med ; 126(1): 55-62, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495272

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify the maintenance of low-contrast detectability at different CT dose reduction levels, in patients of different sizes, as a consequence of the application of iterative reconstruction at different strengths combined with tube current modulation. METHODS: Anthropomorphic abdominal phantoms of two sizes (small and large) were imaged at a fixed noise with iterative algorithm ASIR-V percentages in the range between 0 and 70% and corresponding dose reductions in the range of 0-83%. A total of 1400 images with and without liver low-contrast simulated lesions were evaluated by five radiologists, using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) paradigm and evaluating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The human observer results were then compared with AUC obtained with a channelized Hotelling observer (CHO). CNR values were also calculated. RESULTS: For the small phantom, the AUC values lie between 0.90 and 0.93 for human evaluations of images acquired without iterative reconstruction, with 30% ASIR-V and with 50% ASIR-V. The AUC decreased significantly to 0.81 (p = 0.0001) at 70% ASIR-V. The CHO results were in coherence with human observer scores. Also, similar results were observed for the large size phantom. CNR values were stable for the different ASIR-V percentages. CONCLUSIONS: The iterative algorithm maintained the low-contrast detectability up to a dose reduction of about 70%, following application of a 50% ASIR-V combined with automatic tube current modulation, regardless of the phantom size. At further dose reductions using greater iterative percentages, a significant decrease in detectability was observed.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Body Size , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Algorithms , Anthropometry , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage
13.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(10): 170-178, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996669

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of respiratory motion in the treatment margins for lung SBRT frameless treatments and to validate our treatment margins using 4D CBCT data analysis. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty nine fractions with early stage NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated in frameless and free breathing conditions. The treatment margins were calculated according to van Herk equation in Mid-Ventilation. For each fraction, three 4D CBCT scans, pre- and postcorrection, and posttreatment, were acquired to assess target baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra-fraction motion errors. A bootstrap analysis was performed to assess the minimum number of patients required to define treatment margins. RESULTS: The retrospectively calculated target-baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra-fraction motion errors agreed with the literature. The best tailored margins to our cohort of patients were retrospectively computed and resulted in agreement with already published data. The bootstrap analysis showed that fifteen patients were enough to assess treatment margins. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment margins applied to our patient's cohort resulted in good agreement with the retrospectively calculated margins based on 4D CBCT data. Moreover, the bootstrap analysis revealed to be a promising method to verify the reliability of the applied treatment margins for safe lung SBRT delivery.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Movement , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Respiration , Retrospective Studies
14.
Phys Med ; 76: 28-37, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32574999

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to thoroughly characterize image quality of a novel deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), and investigate its potential for dose reduction in abdominal CT in comparison with filtered back-projection (FBP) and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V). METHODS: We scanned a phantom at three dose levels: regular (7 mGy), low (3 mGy) and ultra-low (1 mGy). Images were reconstructed using DLIR (low, medium and high levels) and ASiR-V (0% = FBP, 50% and 100%). Noise and contrast-dependent spatial resolution were characterized by computing noise power spectra and target transfer functions, respectively. Detectability indexes of simulated acute appendicitis or colonic diverticulitis (low contrast), and calcium-containing urinary stones (high contrast) (|ΔHU| = 50 and 500, respectively) were calculated using the nonprewhitening with eye filter model observer. RESULTS: At all dose levels, increasing DLIR and ASiR-V levels both markedly decreased noise magnitude compared with FBP, with DLIR low and medium maintaining noise texture overall. For both low- and high-contrast spatial resolution, DLIR not only maintained, but even slightly enhanced spatial resolution in comparison with FBP across all dose levels. Conversely, increasing ASiR-V impaired low-contrast spatial resolution compared with FBP. Overall, DLIR outperformed ASiR-V in all simulated clinical scenarios. For both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks, increasing DLIR substantially enhanced detectability at any dose and contrast levels for any simulated lesion size. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike ASiR-V, DLIR substantially reduces noise while maintaining noise texture and slightly enhancing spatial resolution overall. DLIR outperforms ASiR-V by enabling higher detectability of both low- and high-contrast simulated abdominal lesions across all investigated dose levels.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Algorithms , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
15.
Eur Radiol ; 29(12): 6794-6804, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31144074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare institutional dose levels based on clinical indication and BMI class to anatomy-based national DRLs (NDRLs) in chest and abdomen CT examinations and to assess local clinical diagnostic reference levels (LCDRLs). METHODS: From February 2017 to June 2018, after protocol optimization according to clinical indication and body mass index (BMI) class (< 25; ≥ 25), 5310 abdomen and 1058 chest CT series were collected from 5 CT scanners in a Swiss multicenter group. Clinical indication-based institutional dose levels were compared to the Swiss anatomy-based NDRLs. Statistical significance was assessed (p < 0.05). LCDRLs were calculated as the third quartile of the median dose values for each CT scanner. RESULTS: For chest examinations, dose metrics based on clinical indication were always below P75 NDRL for CTDIvol (range 3.9-6.4 vs. 7.0 mGy) and DLP (164.0-211.2 vs. 250 mGycm) in all BMI classes except for DLP in BMI ≥ 25 (248.8-255.4 vs. 250.0 mGycm). For abdomen examinations, they were significantly lower or not different than P50 NDRLs for all BMI classes (3.8-9.0 vs. 10.0 mGy and 192.9-446.8 vs. 470mGycm). The estimated LCDRLs show a drop in CTDIvol (21% for chest and 32% for abdomen, on average) with respect to current DRLs. When considering BMI stratification, the largest LCDRL difference within the same clinical indication is for renal tumor (4.6 mGy for BMI < 25 vs. 10.0 mGy for BMI ≥ 25; - 117%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest the necessity of estimating clinical indication-based DRLs, especially for abdomen examinations. Stratifying per BMI class allows further optimization of the CT doses. KEY POINTS: • Our data show that clinical indication-based DRLs might be more appropriate than anatomy-based DRLs and might help in reducing large variations in dose levels for the same type of examinations. • Stratifying the data per patient-size subgroups (non-overweight, overweight) allows a better optimization of CT doses and therefore the possibility to set LCDRLs based on BMI class. • Institutions who are fostering continuous dose optimization and LDRLs should consider defining protocols based on clinical indication and BMI group, to achieve ALARA.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Examination , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
16.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 6(2): 025501, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131292

ABSTRACT

Task-based image quality procedures in CT that substitute a human observer with a model observer usually use single-slice images with uniform backgrounds from homogeneous phantoms. However, anatomical structures and inhomogeneities in organs generate noise that can affect the detection performance of human observers. The purpose of this work was to assess the impact of background type, uniform or liver, and the viewing modality, single- or multislice, on the detection performance of human and model observers. We collected abdominal CT scans from patients and homogeneous phantom scans in which we digitally inserted low-contrast signals that mimicked a liver lesion. We ran a rating experiment with the two background conditions with three signal sizes and three human observers presenting images in two reading modalities: single- and multislice. In addition, channelized Hotelling observers (CHO) for single- and multislice detection were implemented and evaluated according to their degree of correlation with the human observer performance. For human observers, there was a small but significant improvement in performance with multislice compared to the single-slice viewing mode. Our data did not reveal a significant difference between uniform and anatomical backgrounds. Model observers demonstrated a good correlation with human observers for both viewing modalities. Human observers have very similar performances in both multi- and single-slice viewing mode. It is therefore preferable to use single-slice CHO as this model is computationally more tractable than multislice CHO. However, using images from a homogeneous phantom can result in overestimating image quality as CHO performance tends to be higher in uniform than anatomical backgrounds, while human observers have similar detection performances.

17.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 17734, 2018 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531988

ABSTRACT

To investigate the impact of a partial model-based iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) on image quality in thoracic oncologic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), using human and mathematical model observers. Twenty cancer patients examined with regular-dose thoracic-abdominal-pelvic MDCT were retrospectively included. Thoracic images reconstructed using a sharp kernel and filtered back-projection (reference) or ASiR-V (0-100%, 20% increments; follow-up) were analysed by three thoracic radiologists. Advanced quantitative physical metrics, including detectability indexes of simulated 4-mm-diameter solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities, were computed at regular and reduced doses using a custom-designed phantom. All three radiologists preferred higher ASiR-V levels (best = 80%). Increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased noise magnitude, with slight changes in noise texture. For high-contrast objects, changing the ASiR-V level had no major effect on spatial resolution; whereas for lower-contrast objects, increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose. For both high- and lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, detectability remained excellent, regardless of ASiR-V and dose levels, and increased significantly with increasing ASiR-V levels (all p < 0.001). While high ASiR-V levels (80%) are recommended to detect solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities in regular-dose thoracic oncologic MDCT, care must be taken because, for lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, high ASiR-V levels slightly change noise texture and substantially decrease spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose.


Subject(s)
Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Artifacts , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvis/pathology , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radionuclide Imaging/methods , Retrospective Studies , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
18.
Eur Radiol ; 28(12): 5203-5210, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29858638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the variability in diagnostic information inherent in computed tomography (CT) images acquired at 68 different CT units, with the selected acquisition protocols aiming to answer the same clinical question. METHODS: An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional rings was scanned on 68 CT systems from 62 centres using the local clinical acquisition parameters of the portal venous phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. Low-contrast detectability (LCD) was assessed objectively with channelised Hotelling observer (CHO) using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) paradigm. For each lesion size, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and considered as a figure of merit. The volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) was used to indicate radiation dose exposure. RESULTS: The median CTDIvol used was 5.8 mGy, 10.5 mGy and 16.3 mGy for the small, medium and large phantoms, respectively. The median AUC obtained from clinical CT protocols was 0.96, 0.90 and 0.83 for the small, medium and large phantoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study used a model observer to highlight the difference in image quality levels when dealing with the same clinical question. This difference was important and increased with growing phantom size, which generated large variations in patient exposure. In the end, a standardisation initiative may be launched to ensure comparable diagnostic information for well-defined clinical questions. The image quality requirements, related to the clinical question to be answered, should be the starting point of patient dose optimisation. KEY POINTS: • Model observers enable to assess image quality objectively based on clinical tasks. • Objective image quality assessment should always include several patient sizes. • Clinical diagnostic image quality should be the starting point for patient dose optimisation. • Dose optimisation by applying DRLs only is insufficient for ensuring clinical requirements.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , ROC Curve , Radiation Dosage
19.
J Radiol Prot ; 38(3): 1013-1036, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29786616

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Definition of new national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) for neuro-paediatric CT examinations depending on the medical indication. METHODS: Paediatric cranial CT data sets acquired between January 2013 and December 2016 were retrospectively collected between July 2016 and March 2017 from eight of the largest university and cantonal hospitals that perform most of the neuro-paediatric CTs in Switzerland. A consensus review of CTDIvol and DLP was undertaken for three defined anatomical regions: brain, facial bone, and petrous bone, each with and without contrast medium application. All indications for cranial CT imaging in paediatrics were assigned to one of these three regions. Descriptive statistical analysis of the distribution of the median values for CTDIvol and DLP yielded values in the minimum, maximum, 25th percentile (1st quartile), median (2nd quartile), and 75th percentile (3rd quartile). New DRLs for neuro-paediatric CT examinations in Switzerland were based on the 75th percentiles of the distributions of the median values of all eight centres. Where appropriate, values were rounded such that the DRLs increase or at least remain constant as the age of the patient increases. RESULTS: Our results revealed DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP up to 20% lower than the DRLs used so far in Switzerland and elsewhere in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Swiss neuro-paediatric CT DRL values to establish optimum conditions for paediatric cranial CT examinations. Periodic national updates of DRLs, following international comparisons, are essential.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies
20.
Phys Med ; 48: 111-118, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728223

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate how various generations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms impact low-contrast detectability (LCD) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) for different patient effective diameters, using a quantitative task-based approach. METHODS: Investigations were performed using an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional additional rings to simulate varying patient effective diameters (25, 30, and 35 cm), and containing multiple spherical targets (5, 6, and 8 mm in diameter) with a 20-HU contrast difference. The phantom was scanned using routine abdominal protocols (CTDIvol, 5.9-16 mGy) on four CT systems from two manufacturers. Images were reconstructed using both filtered back-projection (FBP) and various IR algorithms: ASiR 50%, SAFIRE 3 (both statistical IRs), ASiR-V 50%, ADMIRE 3 (both partial model-based IRs), or Veo (full model-based IR). Section thickness/interval was 2/1 mm or 2.5/1.25 mm, except 0.625/0.625 mm for Veo. We assessed LCD using a channelized Hotelling observer with 10 dense differences of Gaussian channels, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a figure of merit. RESULTS: For the smallest phantom (25-cm diameter) and smallest lesion size (5-mm diameter), AUC for FBP and the various IR algorithms did not significantly differ for any of the tested CT systems. For the largest phantom (35-cm diameter), Veo yielded the highest AUC improvement (8.5%). Statistical and partial model-based IR algorithms did not significantly improve LCD. CONCLUSION: In abdominal CT, switching from FBP to IR algorithms offers limited possibilities for achieving significant dose reductions while ensuring a constant objective LCD.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/anatomy & histology , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Algorithms , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...