ABSTRACT
This article is a first assessment of the Italian Code of deontology for nurses (revised in 1999) on the basis of data collected from focus groups with nurses taking part in the Ethical Codes in Nursing (ECN) project. We illustrate the professional context in which the Code was introduced and explain why the 1999 revision was necessary in the light of changes affecting the Italian nursing profession. The most remarkable findings concern professional autonomy and responsibility, and how the Code is thought of as a set of guidelines for nursing practice. We discuss these issues, underlining that the 1999 Code represents a valuable instrument for ethical reflection and examination, a stimulus for putting the moral sense of the nursing profession into action, and that it represents a new era for professional nursing practice in Italy. The results of the analysis also deserve further qualitative study and future consideration.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Codes of Ethics , Ethical Theory , Ethics, Nursing , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Professional Autonomy , Conflict, Psychological , Decision Making , Focus Groups , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Italy , Job Description , Nursing Methodology Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/ethics , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Organizational Innovation , Patient Advocacy/ethics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Professional Competence , Qualitative Research , Social ResponsibilityABSTRACT
AIM: This paper is a report of a study exploring the use of ethical codes and obstacles to their use in nursing practice as perceived by Finnish, Greek and Italian nurses. BACKGROUND: In all European countries nurses are responsible for the well-being of patients, for their own technical and ethical competence and, for their own part, for the high standard of health care in society. These points illustrate the central content areas of nursing codes of ethics. Recent advances in medical technology have added to the complexity of nursing. Nurses today are increasingly confronted with ethical dilemmas, underlining the role and meaning of ethical codes in their decision-making. However, there is only very limited research literature on codes of ethics, their use in nursing practice and obstacles to their use. METHODS: Twenty-three focus group interviews were conducted in 2003 with a total of 138 Registered Nurses: 35 in Finland, 54 in Greece and 49 in Italy. The data were content analysed. FINDINGS: Two main categories emerged from our analysis of the use of ethical codes: (1) conscious and (2) unconscious use. Seven main categories described the obstacles to the use of ethical codes: (1) the codes themselves, (2) nurses themselves, (3) multiprofessional teamwork, (4) patients' family members, (5) the organization, (6) the nursing profession and (7) society/healthcare policy. Participants in all three countries were firmly committed to the values expressed in ethical nursing codes. Nonetheless, continued efforts are needed in all these countries to remove the remaining obstacles so that nursing care can be provided in keeping with the requirements of ethical codes. CONCLUSION: The use of codes is connected with the changes in nursing profession and in society at large. The core of nursing, however, has remained stable. Future studies should be conducted in order to generalize the findings to a broader population.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Codes of Ethics , Ethics, Nursing , Nurses/psychology , Nursing Process/ethics , Adult , Clinical Nursing Research , Female , Finland , Focus Groups , Greece , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Nurses are responsible for the well-being and quality of life of many people, and therefore must meet high standards of technical and ethical competence. The most common form of ethical guidance is a code of ethics/professional practice; however, little research on how codes are viewed or used in practice has been undertaken. This study, carried out in six European countries, explored nurses' opinions of the content and function of codes and their use in nursing practice. A total of 49 focus groups involving 311 nurses were held. Purposive sampling ensured a mix of participants from a range of specialisms. Qualitative analysis enabled emerging themes to be identified on both national and comparative bases. Most participants had a poor understanding of their codes. They were unfamiliar with the content and believed they have little practical value because of extensive barriers to their effective use. In many countries nursing codes appear to be 'paper tigers' with little or no impact; changes are needed in the way they are developed and written, introduced in nurse education, and reinforced/implemented in clinical practice.
